Korean-speaking L2 Learners’ Comprehension of Sentences Containing Numerically Quantified NPs and Negation in English
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study investigates Korean-speaking second language learners’ comprehension of scopally ambiguous sentences in English that contain numerically quantified object NPs and negation (e.g., Tom didn’t cut down two apple trees). Using a written Truth Value Judgment Task, the study examines how the learners’ interpretive preferences in English compare to those of their native language and whether there are any differences in interpretive preferences across proficiency levels. Seventy native Korean-speaking learners of English, divided into low and high proficiency groups, and twelve English native speakers participated in the study. The participants’ responses in the Truth Value Judgment Task were analyzed in terms of the acceptance of specific or non-specific interpretations of the target sentences. The learners tended to prefer the specific interpretation to the non-specific interpretation, in contrast to the English native speakers, who did not show a clear preference. The learners’ preference in English was similar to their preference in Korean. The low and high proficiency learner groups showed no difference in their interpretive preferences. The learners’ interpretive preferences in English are discussed in the framework of the processor-based approach to scope interpretation proposed by O’Grady (2005, 2008, 2013) and O’Grady, M. Lee and H. Y. Kwak (2009), which highlights the importance of processing considerations in scope interpretation.
Abstract
This study investigates Korean-speaking second language learners’ comprehension of scopally ambiguous sentences in English that contain numerically quantified object NPs and negation (e.g., Tom didn’t cut down two apple trees). Using a written Truth Value Judgment Task, the study examines how the learners’ interpretive preferences in English compare to those of their native language and whether there are any differences in interpretive preferences across proficiency levels. Seventy native Korean-speaking learners of English, divided into low and high proficiency groups, and twelve English native speakers participated in the study. The participants’ responses in the Truth Value Judgment Task were analyzed in terms of the acceptance of specific or non-specific interpretations of the target sentences. The learners tended to prefer the specific interpretation to the non-specific interpretation, in contrast to the English native speakers, who did not show a clear preference. The learners’ preference in English was similar to their preference in Korean. The low and high proficiency learner groups showed no difference in their interpretive preferences. The learners’ interpretive preferences in English are discussed in the framework of the processor-based approach to scope interpretation proposed by O’Grady (2005, 2008, 2013) and O’Grady, M. Lee and H. Y. Kwak (2009), which highlights the importance of processing considerations in scope interpretation.
참고문헌 (18)
- Brown, J. D., "Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests", Modern Language Journal, 64(3), pp.311~317 (1980)
- Choo, Miho, "Using Korean : A guide to contemporary usage" (2008), Cambridge University Press
- Crain, S., "Investigations in Universal Grammar" (1998), MIT Press
- Gennari, S., "Acquisition of negation and quantification : Insights from adult production and comprehension", Language Acquisition, 13(2), pp.125~168 (2006)
- Grodner, D., "Consequences of the serial nature of linguistic input for sentential complexity", Cognitive Science, 29, pp.261~290 (2005)
- Hornstein, N., "Logic as grammar" (1984), MIT Press
- Kang, Beom-Mo., "Plurality and other semantic aspects of common nouns in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 3, pp.1~24 (1994)
- Kang, Beom-Mo., "Categories and meanings of Korean floating quantifiers —with some reference to Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, pp.375~398 (2002)
- 김미숙, "Korean EFL Learners' Interpretation of Quantifier-Negation Scope Interaction in English", 영어학연구, 16(1), pp.164~183 (2010), 한국영어학학회
- 곽혜영, "Korean-speaking Children’s Acquisition of Interpretations of Scopally Ambiguous Sentences: Numeral Quantifiers and Negation", 응용언어학, 28(1), pp.261~295 (2012), 한국응용언어학회
- Lee, Sunyoung., "Interpreting scope ambiguity in first and second language processing: Universal quantifiers and negation", 박사, pp.2009
- Lidz, J., "Children’s command of quantification", Cognition, 84, pp.113~154 (2002)
- Musolino, J., "The scope of isomorphism : Turning adults into children", Language Acquisition, 11(4), pp.277~291 (2003)
- O’Grady, W., "Syntactic carpentry : An emergentist approach to syntax" (2005), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
- O’Grady, W., "Does Emergentism have a chance?", Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp.16~35 (2008)
- O’Grady, W., "The illusion of language acquisition", Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, pp.253~285 (2013)
- O’Grady, W., "The new handbook of second language acquisition", pp.69~88 (2009), Emerald Press
- Özçelik, Ö., "L2 acquisition of scope: Testing the full transfer full access hypothesis", Proceedings of the 10th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition Conference, pp.168~179 (2009)