본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Gender Effect on the Use of Communication Strategies in Case of Korean College Students

송민종
현대영어교육학회 (The Modern English Education Society)|2014.08|현대영어교육 (Modern English Education)|제15권 제3호|pp. 43-63

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

communication strategiesgender effect성별 효과의사소통전략types and frequencies유형과 빈도수

초록

To investigate differences in the use of communication strategies (CSs) betweendifferent genders, this study explored the CSs used by Korean college students wheninteracting with their peers. The 40 students who participated in the study were dividedinto 20 same-gender pairs, with each pair consisting of 2 females or 2 males. For datacollection, a questionnaire, a speaking task (an interview), and tape recordings wereemployed. Those 10 female-female and 10 male-male pairs had 2 interviews, each, andthe 40 interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. For statistical analysis, afrequency analysis and a t-test were administered. As a result, it was shown that ingeneral, the students used a limited variety of types, adopting direct strategies the mostand interactional strategies the least, and, between the two genders, both female andmale students appeared to use the same types and frequencies. Accordingly, it wasconcluded that no gender-related significant effect was identified on the use of CSswith Korean college students. Suggestions were made about increasing opportunitiesfor interaction between the students themselves and training them in the use of CSs,especially focused on the interactional strategies and the other infrequently used onesin this study.

Abstract

To investigate differences in the use of communication strategies (CSs) betweendifferent genders, this study explored the CSs used by Korean college students wheninteracting with their peers. The 40 students who participated in the study were dividedinto 20 same-gender pairs, with each pair consisting of 2 females or 2 males. For datacollection, a questionnaire, a speaking task (an interview), and tape recordings wereemployed. Those 10 female-female and 10 male-male pairs had 2 interviews, each, andthe 40 interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. For statistical analysis, afrequency analysis and a t-test were administered. As a result, it was shown that ingeneral, the students used a limited variety of types, adopting direct strategies the mostand interactional strategies the least, and, between the two genders, both female andmale students appeared to use the same types and frequencies. Accordingly, it wasconcluded that no gender-related significant effect was identified on the use of CSswith Korean college students. Suggestions were made about increasing opportunitiesfor interaction between the students themselves and training them in the use of CSs,especially focused on the interactional strategies and the other infrequently used onesin this study.

참고문헌 (45)

  1. Bialystok, E., "Communication strategies : A psychological analysis of secondlanguage use" (1990), Basil Blackwell
  2. 차미양, "Korean college students’ use of communication strategies in two different sets of interactions", 현대영어교육, 12(3), pp.1~22 (2011), 현대영어교육학회
  3. Chang, Bok-Myung., "A critical analysis of communicative strategies among nonnative English speakers", Modern English Education, 5(2), pp.173~195 (2004)
  4. Chen, Si-Qing., "A study of communication strategies in interlanguage production by Chinese EFL learners", Language Learning, 40(2), pp.155~187 (1990)
  5. Colley, A., "Gender linked differences in the style and content of Emails to friends", Language in Society, 32(5), pp.381~391 (2003)
  6. Conrad, C., "Communication in conflict : Style-strategy relationships", Communication Monographs, 58(2), pp.135~155 (1991)
  7. Corder, S. P., "Error analysis and interlanguage" (1981), Oxford University Press
  8. Dornyei, Z., "On the teachability of communication strategies", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.55~85 (1995)
  9. Dornyei, Z., "Communication strategies in a second language : Definitions and taxonomies", Language Learning, 47(1), pp.173~210 (1997)
  10. Edelsky, C., "Who's got the floor?", Language in Society, 10(3), pp.383~421 (1981)
  11. Erickson, B., "Speech style and impression formation in a court setting : The effects of"powerful"and"powerless"speech", Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14(3), pp.266~279 (1978)
  12. Faerch, C., "Processes and strategies in foreign language learning and communication", Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 5(1), pp.47~118 (1980)
  13. Fishman, P., "Language, gender and society", pp.89~110 (1983), Newbury House
  14. Foster, P., "Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language classrooms", Applied Linguistics, 26(3), pp.402~430 (2005)
  15. Freed, A. F., "The handbook of language and gender", pp.699~721 (2003), Blackwell
  16. Gass, S. M., "Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition", pp.327~351 (1986), Newbury House
  17. Henley, N., "The women and language debate: A sourcebook", pp.383~406 (1994), Rutgers University Press
  18. Hongling, L., "Gender effect on the use of communication strategies", English Language Teaching, 3(4), pp.28~32 (2010)
  19. Hou, Song-Shan., "The effect of task and sex on the use of communication strategies", The Journal of PLA of Foreign Language, 6, pp.20~25 (1998)
  20. Jespersen, O., "Mankind, nation and individual : From a linguistic point of view" (1925), Routledge
  21. Jin, Jae-Hee., "A study of communication strategies for learners of Korean as a foreign language", 석사, pp.2000
  22. Kelley, R. H., "Communication between men and women in the context of the Christian community", Faith & Mission, pp.1~7 (1996)
  23. 김익환, "성 차이가 언어 변이에 미치는 영향", 현대영어교육, 8(1), pp.56~72 (2007), 현대영어교육학회
  24. The role of gender on communication strategy use, "Kocoglu, Z.", Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, ~, pp.ERIC documentation No. 409 725 (1997)
  25. Korabik, K., "Managers’ conflict management style and leadership effectiveness : The moderating effects of gender", Sex Roles, 29(5), pp.405~418 (1993)
  26. Lakoff, R., "Language and woman’s place" (1975), Harper and Row
  27. Lakoff, R., "Talking power : The politics of language" (1990), Basics Books
  28. Mayo, M. P., "Interaction among proficient learners: Are input, feedback and output needs addressed in a foreign language context?", Studia Linguistica, 54(2), pp.272~279 (2000)
  29. Mulac, A., "Men’s and women’s talk in same-gender and mixed-gender dyads: Power or polemics?", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 8(3), pp.249~270 (1989)
  30. Paribakht, T., "Strategic competence and language proficiency", Applied Linguistics, 6(2), pp.132~146 (1985)
  31. 박경자, "와세다대학교-강원대학교 원격수업을 위한 의사소통 중심의 영어수업 모형 개발", 영어어문교육, 9(1), pp.83~129 (2003), 한국영어어문교육학회
  32. Pica, T., "Language learning through interaction: What role does gender play?", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13(3), pp.343~376 (1991)
  33. Pica, T., "Language learners’ interaction: How does it address the input, output, and feedback needs of L2 learners?", TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), pp.59~84 (1996)
  34. "Gender differences in E-mail communication" (2005)[URL]
  35. Samar, R. G., "The gender-linked differences in the use of linguistic strategies in face-to-face communication", Linguistics Journal, 3(3), pp.59~71 (2007)
  36. Selinker, L., "Interlanguage", International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, pp.209~230 (1972)
  37. Stern, H. H., "Fundamental concepts of language teaching" (1983), Oxford University Press
  38. Tannen, D., "You just do not understand : Women and men in conversation" (1990), Ballantine
  39. Tannen, D., "Gender and conversational interaction" (1993), Oxford University Press
  40. Tarone, E., "On TESOL ’77", pp.194~203 (1977), TESOL
  41. Tarone, E., "Communication strategies, foreigner talk, and repair in interlanguage", Language Learning, 30(2), pp.417~431 (1980)
  42. Tarone, E., "Teaching strategic competence in the foreign language classroom", Studies in Language Learning, 4(2), pp.121~130 (1983)
  43. Trudgill, P., "Sex, covert prestige, and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich", Language in Society, 1(2), pp.179~195 (1972)
  44. Wang, H. S., "The role of gender in interactional learner communication strategies", 박사, pp.1993
  45. Wang, Li-Mei., "The gender differences in the acquisition of communication strategies", Foreign Language and Their Teaching, 8, pp.37~41 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

Korean college students’ use of communication strategies in two different sets of interactions송민종, 차미양현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2011 · 제12권 제3호Factors Affecting the Choice of Communication Strategies in Interaction of EFL College Learners박은경, 엄철주대한영어영문학회 · 영어영문학연구2014 · 제56권 제2호English Learners’ Perceived Preferences for Different Types of Achievement Communication Strategies김은주현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2010 · 제11권 제3호Effects of Communicative Strategies Instruction on Korean EFL College Students이길영, 한지영현대영어교육학회 · 현대영어교육2012 · 제13권 제3호대학생들의 영어 의사소통 책략 사용 연구정미애한국현대언어학회 · 언어연구2012 · 제28권 제1호Identifying Korean College Learners’Communication Strategies in English-Mediated Classes전지현팬코리아영어교육학회 · 영어교육연구2012 · 제24권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)

Activity Theory-based Narrative Inquiry of Study-Abroad Program Experiences: A Case Study of Two College Students김은주pp. 1-20Supporting Details in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese L2 Learners’ Argumentative Writing정철원, 최호성pp. 21-42Korean-speaking L2 Learners’ Comprehension of Sentences Containing Numerically Quantified NPs and Negation in English곽혜영pp. 66-84Pragmatic Listening Comprehension of English Intonation: Variation across Item Type and L2 Proficiency이미진pp. 86-102Cross-cultural Differences in Using English Requests During Synchronous Computer Communication황은하, 이나리pp. 104-121
원문 보기