본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학수학능력시험 영어 듣기와 읽기 지문의 어휘, 통사, 담화적 특성 비교

A comparison of the lexical, syntactic, and discourse features between the listening and the reading texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test

1

조회

0

다운로드

9

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The aim of this study is to compare the lexical, syntactic, and discourse features between the listening and the reading texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT). Dialogues, monologues and reading texts from the 1994 to 2020 CSATs, were analyzed using Coh-Metrix. A total of 30 separate ANOVAs, with the text as the independent variable and the numerical index obtained via Coh-Metrix as the dependent variable of each ANOVA, were conducted. The results reveal that the texts show differences in terms of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features. The texts mostly match the descriptions of the relevant literature on spoken and written languages. However, there are some discrepancies with respect to lexical diversity and syntactic density in the listening texts. These findings indicate possible differences between actual spoken data and the listening texts in the CSAT. This study suggests that test developers should pay attention to the linguistic features of spoken texts when writing test items for the CSAT. Implications for ways to enhance the authenticity of the CSAT are also discussed.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to compare the lexical, syntactic, and discourse features between the listening and the reading texts in the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT). Dialogues, monologues and reading texts from the 1994 to 2020 CSATs, were analyzed using Coh-Metrix. A total of 30 separate ANOVAs, with the text as the independent variable and the numerical index obtained via Coh-Metrix as the dependent variable of each ANOVA, were conducted. The results reveal that the texts show differences in terms of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features. The texts mostly match the descriptions of the relevant literature on spoken and written languages. However, there are some discrepancies with respect to lexical diversity and syntactic density in the listening texts. These findings indicate possible differences between actual spoken data and the listening texts in the CSAT. This study suggests that test developers should pay attention to the linguistic features of spoken texts when writing test items for the CSAT. Implications for ways to enhance the authenticity of the CSAT are also discussed.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Atkinson, J. M., "Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis" (1984), Cambridge University Press
  2. Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Pearson Education Limited
  3. Brown, H. D., "Language assessment:Principles and classroom pra" (2019), Longman
  4. Brown, H. D., "Teaching by principles" (2015), Longman
  5. Cain, K., "The influence of connectives on young readers’ processing and comprehension of text", Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), pp.429~441 (2011)
  6. Carter, R., "Applying English grammar: Functional and corpus approaches", pp.25~39 (2004), Arnold
  7. Carter, R., "Cambridge grammar of English: Spoken and written English grammar and usage" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  8. 장지연, "절대평가 도입 전후 수능 영어 독해 지문의 통사적 복잡성 비교", 영어교과교육, 18(2), pp.161~188 (2019), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
  9. 최민주, "수능 영어 문항 유형간 응집력과 어휘정보 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(12), pp.378~385 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  10. Cullen, R., "Spoken grammar and ELT course materials: A missing link?", TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), pp.361~386 (2007)
  11. de Beaugrande, R., "Introduction to text linguistics" (1981), Longman
  12. Fellegy, A. M., "Patterns and functions of minimal response", American Speech, 70, pp.186~199 (1995)
  13. Graesser, A. C., "Coh-Metrix: Analysis of text on cohesion and language", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(2), pp.193~202 (2004)
  14. Gutwinski, W., "Cohesion in literary texts" (1976), Mouton
  15. Halliday, M. A. K., "Spoken and written language" (1985), Deakin University Press
  16. Halliday, M. A. K., "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  17. 황이수, "수학능력시험 영어 읽기 지문의 응집성과 문항 난이도 간의 상관관계 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(5), pp.344~350 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  18. 황이수, "수학능력시험 영어 지문의 텍스트 요인과 문항 난이도의 상관관계 분석: 통사적 복잡성을 중심으로", 영어영문학연구, 46(1), pp.265~283 (2020), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
  19. 전문기, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 중학교 1학년과 2학년 개정 영어교과서 읽기 자료의 코퍼스 언어학적 연계성 분석", 언어과학연구, (56), pp.201~218 (2011), 언어과학회
  20. Kellerman, S., "‘I see what you mean’ : The role of kinesic behaviour in listening and implications for foreign and second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 13(3), pp.239~258 (1992)
  21. Kim, Jeong-Ryeol, "A diachronic analysis of English KSAT reading passages", Journal of the Elementary Education Society, 27, pp.64~78 (2017)
  22. 고나은, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 수능 영어 읽기 영역 지문 난이도 비교: EBS-수능 연계 정책 전후", 중등영어교육, 10(4), pp.3~24 (2017), 한국중등영어교육학회
  23. 이현우, "수능 영어 시험과 수능-EBS 연계 교재에 사용된 어휘에 대한 분석: 읽기 시험을 중심으로", 현대영어교육, 21(3), pp.48~57 (2020), 현대영어교육학회[DOI]
  24. Leech, G., "Grammars of spoken English : New outcomes of corpus-oriented research", Language Learning, 50(4), pp.675~724 (2000)
  25. Leech, G., "Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Based on the British national corpus" (2001), Pearson Education Limited
  26. Leech, G., "Style in fiction: A linguistic introduction to English fictional prose" (1981), Longman
  27. McCarthy, M., "Spoken language and applied linguistics" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  28. McCarthy, M., "Grammar, tails and affect : Constructing expressive choices in discourse", Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 17(3), pp.405~429 (1997)
  29. McCarthy, M., "MTLD, vocd-D, and HDD : A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment", Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), pp.381~392 (2010)
  30. McNamara, D. S., "Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix" (2014), Cambridge University Press
  31. McNamara, D. S., "Learning from texts : Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence", Discourse Processes, 22(3), pp.247~288 (1996)
  32. McNamara, D. S., "Coh-metrix : Capturing linguistic features of cohesion", Discourse Processes, 47(4), pp.292~330 (2010)
  33. 문지현, "대학수학능력시험 영어 읽기 지문의 언어적 요소 분석", 현대영어교육, 18(1), pp.193~211 (2017), 현대영어교육학회
  34. Nation, I. S. P., "How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening?", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), pp.59~82 (2006)
  35. 류주연, "영어 듣기 문항의 발화 속도와 언어적 요소 분석—1994-2018학년도 대학수학능력시험", 영어영문학21, 33(4), pp.105~127 (2020), 21세기영어영문학회[DOI]
  36. 신유선, "Coh-Metrix와 VocabProfile를 활용한 수능 영어 독해 지문의 분석: 2016-2019년 4년을 중심으로", 언어과학, 26(4), pp.109~127 (2019), 한국언어과학회[DOI]
  37. Thornbury, S., "Conversation : From description to pedagogy" (2006), Cambridge University Press
  38. van Lier, L., "Reeling, writing, drawing, stretching, and fainting in coils : Oral proficiency interviews as conversation", TESOL Quarterly, 23(3), pp.489~508 (1989)
  39. Widdowson, H. G., "Explorations in applied linguistics" (1979), Oxford University Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)