대만과 일본과의 비교를 통한 한국 대학생들의 창의적 영어 학습활동에 관한 인식 연구
A study on Korean university students’ recognition regarding creative English learning activities through comparing Taiwanese and Japanese university students
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has investigated the college students' English learning methods of three different countries (Korea, Taiwan, and Japan). To do so, this study provided the examples of 19 English learning activities, which are divided into two different reigns (convergent and divergent English learning activities). Then, this research asked students to response what your opinions are by marking one of 5 answers (from strongly agree to strongly disagree). Nine convergent English learning activities (multiple choices, matching items, etc.) are that it leads to a single "best" answer, and thus leaves no room for ambiguity. Answers are either right or wrong. On the other hands, ten divergent activities (compare & contrast, unusual uses, etc.) lead to a variety of answers in situation where more than one answer is acceptable. Approximately 150 college students have participated in this study. The results showed that Korean students strongly prefer divergent English learning activities over convergent activities, and they regard these activities as more effective in facilitating creativity in English classes. Nonetheless, other than brainstorming, which is a divergent activity, Korean students usually use convergent activities (grammar drills, multiple choices, etc) in their English learning. True/false and either/or questions are rarely used by Korean students. On the other hand, Japanese students prefer convergent English learning activities and they never use divergent activities in their learning. In the case of Taiwan students, they acknowledged the effectiveness of divergent English learning activities but they never use them in their learning. Based on the results, this study suggested eight proposals for Korean English education as well as those of the other two countries
Abstract
This study has investigated the college students' English learning methods of three different countries (Korea, Taiwan, and Japan). To do so, this study provided the examples of 19 English learning activities, which are divided into two different reigns (convergent and divergent English learning activities). Then, this research asked students to response what your opinions are by marking one of 5 answers (from strongly agree to strongly disagree). Nine convergent English learning activities (multiple choices, matching items, etc.) are that it leads to a single "best" answer, and thus leaves no room for ambiguity. Answers are either right or wrong. On the other hands, ten divergent activities (compare & contrast, unusual uses, etc.) lead to a variety of answers in situation where more than one answer is acceptable. Approximately 150 college students have participated in this study. The results showed that Korean students strongly prefer divergent English learning activities over convergent activities, and they regard these activities as more effective in facilitating creativity in English classes. Nonetheless, other than brainstorming, which is a divergent activity, Korean students usually use convergent activities (grammar drills, multiple choices, etc) in their English learning. True/false and either/or questions are rarely used by Korean students. On the other hand, Japanese students prefer convergent English learning activities and they never use divergent activities in their learning. In the case of Taiwan students, they acknowledged the effectiveness of divergent English learning activities but they never use them in their learning. Based on the results, this study suggested eight proposals for Korean English education as well as those of the other two countries
참고문헌 (40)
- 교육부, "외국어과 교육과정" (2007), 교육과학기술부
- 김영채, "창의력의 이론과 개발" (2007), 교육과학사
- 김진영, "창의성 향상을 위한 영어 쓰기 지도 : 고등학생을 중심으로", 석사, pp.2008
- 노승빈, "창의성과 영어교육의 통합을 위한 교과과정", 사고개발, 3(2), pp.61~72 (2007), 대한사고개발학회
- 민현정, "대학생 영어의 언어적 창의성 신장방안 연구 -북클럽의 수준별 영어다독 활동을 통한 언어의 유창성과 융통성을 중심으로-", 창의력교육연구, 11(2), pp.5~26 (2011), 한국창의력교육학회
- 손중선, "창의성과 초등영어교육: 단기기억 메커니즘을 통한 창의성 교육의 가능성 고찰", 영어영문학연구, 33(1), pp.305~328 (2007), 대한영어영문학회[DOI]
- 양용칠, "교육의 종합적 이해" (1999), 교육과학사
- 오수정, "창의사고기법을 활용한 영어 수업이 말하기 수업 흥미도에 미치는 영향 : 고등학생 중심으로", 석사, pp.2012
- 이병민, "선발을 위한 점수 위주의 영어교육이 문제의 본질이다", 오늘의 청소년, 34, pp.2~8 (2008)
- 임보화, "창의적 사고기법을 활용한 영시 지도안", 석사, pp.2009
- 창의성 신장을 위한 교수-학습 방안 연구 보고, "한국교육과정평가원", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2010)
- Birckbichler, D. W, "Creative activities for the second language classroom" (1982), Center for Applied Linguistics
- Bowkett, S, "100 ideas for teaching creativity" (2001), Continuum
- Bowkett, S, "100+ ideas for teaching creativity" (2007), Continuum
- Butler, Y, "What level of English proficiency do elementary school teachers need to attain to teach EFL? Case studies from Korea, Taiwan, and Japan", TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), pp.245~278 (2004)
- Butler, Y, "Foreign language education at elementary schools in Japan: Searching for solutions amidst growing diversification", Current Issues in Language Teaching, 8, pp.129~147 (2007)
- Bultler, Y, "Current Japanese reforms in English language education: The 2003 “Action Plan.”", Language Policy, 4, pp.25~45 (2004)
- Carless, D. R, "Implementing task-based learning with young learners", ELT Journal, 56, pp.389~396 (2002)
- Carless, D. R, "Factors in the implementation of task-based teaching in primary schools", System, 31, pp.485~500 (2003)
- Carless, D. R, "Collaborative EFL teaching in primary school", ELT Journal, 60, pp.328~354 (2006)
- Cropley, A, "In praise of convergent thinking", Creativity Research Journal, 18(1), pp.291~404 (2006)
- Finocchiaro, M, "The functional-notional approach: from theory to practice" (1983), Oxford University Press
- Gardner, H, "Creating minds" (1993), Basic
- Guilford, J. P, "Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications" (1968), Robert R. Knapp
- Hayes, J. R, "The complete problem solver" (1989), Erlbaum
- Hendrickson, U. S, "The effects of error correction treatments", 박사, pp.1976
- Honna, N, "English language teaching in Japan: policy plans and their implementations", RELC Journal, 36(3), pp.363~383 (2005)
- Igawa, K, "Issues in English language education at Korean elementary schools", Bulletin of Shitennoji Kyoto University, 44, pp.219~236 (2007)
- Ikegashira, A, "English education in Japan: from kindergarten to university, In Into the next decade with 2nd FL teaching", pp.16~40 (2009), Rudolf Reinelt Research Laboatory
- McFarlane, R, "Transcending Numerical Grading: The benefits of one on one assessment for learning English conversation in a Taiwanese university", International Journal of Learning, 17(2), pp.171~180 (2010)
- Nunan, D, "The impact of English as a global language on educational policies and practices in the Asia-Pacific Region", TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), pp.589~613 (2003)
- Osborn, A. F, "Applied imagination" (1963), Scribner
- Roh, Seungbin, "On reconceptualizing creativity regarding the Korean EFL education climate", Paper presented at 7th ASIA TEFL International Conference (2009)
- 노승빈, "In Praise of Divergent Teaching Methods in Korean English Education", 사고개발, 7(1), pp.135~163 (2011), 대한사고개발학회
- Shin, C, "The General English Proficiency Test", Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(1), pp.63~76 (2008)
- Snow, C.E, "Comment on "The federal bilingual education program" by Christine H. Rossell, In Brookings papers on education policy", pp.237~253 (2000), Brookings Institution Press
- Su, Y. C, "EFL teachers’ perceptions of English language policy at the elementary level in Taiwan", Educational Studies, 32, pp.265~283 (2006)
- Thurston, B.J, "Flexibility", Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2, pp.729~733 (1999)
- Torrance, E. P, "Guiding creative talent" (1962), Prentice-Hall
- Urban, K. K, "Modeling creativity: the convergence of divergence or the art of balancing, In Maximizing potential: lengthening and strengthening our stride", pp.39~50 (1997), Social Sciences Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong