본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Perceptual Learning Styles in Korean Middle School EFL Textbooks

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The purpose of this study is to examine Korean English as a foreign language textbooks for middle school education from the perspective of perceptual learning styles. One of Reid’s hypotheses about learning styles is that “learning styles, if unchecked, persist regardless of teaching methods and materials” (Peacock, 2001, p.2). This hypothesis forms the rationale and framework for this study. Korean EFL students in a middle school completed a Reid’s Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that among four basic perceptual learning styles, auditory is a major preference of students, while kinesthetic, visual, and tactile are minor; additionally, with regard to relation to others, group is preferred to individual. However, this study finds that activities in Korean EFL textbooks are not properly attuned to students’ learning styles. The textbooks use auditory and visual activities predominantly; furthermore, the textbooks employ significantly fewer activities for kinesthetic and tactile types; individual type activities outnumber group activities. This study provides insights into the topics that have the potential to improve the practice of EFL teaching.

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine Korean English as a foreign language textbooks for middle school education from the perspective of perceptual learning styles. One of Reid’s hypotheses about learning styles is that “learning styles, if unchecked, persist regardless of teaching methods and materials” (Peacock, 2001, p.2). This hypothesis forms the rationale and framework for this study. Korean EFL students in a middle school completed a Reid’s Perceptual Learning Style Preference Questionnaire. The results of this study indicate that among four basic perceptual learning styles, auditory is a major preference of students, while kinesthetic, visual, and tactile are minor; additionally, with regard to relation to others, group is preferred to individual. However, this study finds that activities in Korean EFL textbooks are not properly attuned to students’ learning styles. The textbooks use auditory and visual activities predominantly; furthermore, the textbooks employ significantly fewer activities for kinesthetic and tactile types; individual type activities outnumber group activities. This study provides insights into the topics that have the potential to improve the practice of EFL teaching.

참고문헌 (54)

  1. Alfonseca, E., "The impact of learning styles on student grouping for collaborative learning : A case study", User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 16, pp.377~401 (2006)
  2. Bailey, P., "Using learning style to predict foreign language achievement at the college level", System, 28, pp.115~133 (2000)
  3. Braio, C. A., "Incremental implementation of learning-style strategies among urban low achievers", The Journal of Educational Research, 91, pp.15~25 (1997)
  4. 차경환, "An Analysis of Listening Activities in Korean Middle School English Textbooks", 영어교육, 58(1), pp.3~15 (2003), 한국영어교육학회
  5. Chang, Young-Hee, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Neungryul Publishing
  6. Chen, M., "Influence of grade level on perceptual learning style preferences and language learning strategies of Taiwanese English as a foreign language learners", Learning and Individual Differences, 19, pp.304~308 (2009)
  7. Dörnyei, Z., "Individual differences in second language learning, In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition", pp.589~629 (2008), Blackwell
  8. Ehrman, M., "Understanding second language learning difficulties" (1996), Sage Publications
  9. Ehrman, M., "Adult language learning styles and strategies in an intensive training setting", The Modern Language Journal, 74, pp.311~327 (1990)
  10. Ehrman, M., "A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning", System, 31, pp.313~330 (2003)
  11. Ellis, R., "Individual differences in second language learning, In The Handbook of Applied Linguistics", pp.525~551 (2004), Blackwell
  12. Felder, R. M., "Learning and teaching styles in foreign and second language education", Foreign Language Annals, 28(1), pp.21~31 (1995)
  13. Gardner, H., "Educational implications of theory of multiple intelligences", Educational Research, 18(4), pp.4~9 (1989)
  14. Hilberg, S., "Theoretical perspectives, research findings, and classroom implications of the learning styles of American Indian and Alaska native students", The ERIC Digest, EDO-RC-02-3, September, ~ (2002)
  15. Honigsfeld, A., "High school male and female learning-style similarities and differences in diverse nations", Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), pp.195~206 (2003)
  16. Hyland, K., "Culture and learning : A study of the learning style preferences of Japanese students", RELC Journal, 24(2), pp.69~91 (1993)
  17. Johnson, B., "Approaches to research in second language learning" (1992), Longman
  18. Kim, Im-Deuk, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Gyohaksa Publishing
  19. 김경자, "An Examination of the Psychometric Properties of the PLSPQ for Korean EFL College Students", Foreign Languages Education, 14(2), pp.133~157 (2007), 한국외국어교육학회
  20. Kim, Sung-Gon, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Doosan Donga Publishing
  21. Kim, Yong-Jin, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Didimdol Publishing
  22. 김윤경, "The Effect of Korean Secondary School Students' Perceptual Learning Styles and Ideal L2 Self on Motivated L2 Behavior and English Proficiency", 영어학, 11(1), pp.21~42 (2011), 한국영어학회
  23. EFL classroom, "Understanding and empowering diverse learners in ESL classrooms, In Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Kinsella, K.
  24. Kolb, A., "Learning styles and learning spaces : Enhancing experiential learning in higher education", Experience-Based Learning Systems, 4(2), pp.193~212 (2005)
  25. Kozhevnikov, M., "Cognitive styles in the context of modern psychology : Toward an integrated framework of cognitive style psychological bulletin copyright", The American Psychological Association, 133(3), pp.464~481 (2007)
  26. EFL classroom, "Meeting language learners’ sensory-learning-style preferences, In Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Kroonenberg, N.
  27. Kwon, O-Ryang, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Gumsung Publishing
  28. Lawrence, G., "People types and tiger stripes" (1993), Center for Applications of Psychological Type
  29. Lee, Byoung-Geon, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Koryeo Publishing
  30. Lee, Da-Mi, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Gihaksa Publishing
  31. Lee, Jae-Young, "Middle School English 2" (2009), Chunjaegyoyuk Publishing
  32. Liu, N., "Why do many students appear reluctant to participate in classroom learning discourse?", System, 25, pp.371~384 (1997)
  33. McLoughlin, C., "The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material", Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15(3), pp.222~241 (1999)
  34. Montgomery S. M., "Student learning styles and their implications for teaching", CRLT Occasional Papers, 10, pp.1~8 (1998)
  35. Naimie, Z., "Do you think your match is made in heaven? Teaching styles", learning styles match and mismatch revisited, 2010, pp.2, 349~353
  36. Nielsen, T., "Implementation of learning styles at the teacher level", Education + Training, 50(2), pp.155~166 (2008)
  37. Nunan, D., "Practical English language teaching" (2003), McGraw Hill
  38. Oxford, R. L., "Language learning styles and strategies : Concepts and relationships", IRAL, 41, pp.271~278 (2003)
  39. Language learning styles and strategies: An overview, "Oxford, R. L.", GALA, 1~25 (2003)
  40. Park, Clara. C., "Crosscultural differences in learning styles of secondary English learners", Bilingual Research Journal, 26(2), pp.213~229 (2002)
  41. Park, Ja-Young., "A study of Korean middle school students' personality and preference styles for activity types in EFL textbooks: From Jung’s personality types theory", 석사, pp.2008
  42. Peacock, M., "Match or mismatch? Learning styles and teaching styles in EFL", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(1), pp.1~19 (2001)
  43. EFL classroom, "Learning styles and elementary school ESL, In Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Peck, S.
  44. Psalton-Joycey, A., "Major, minor, and negative learning style preferences of university students", System, 39, pp.103~112 (2011)
  45. Reid, J. M., "The learning style preferences of ESL students", TESOL Quarterly, 21, pp.87~111 (1987)
  46. EFL classroom, "Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Reid, J. M.
  47. Riding, R., "Cognitive style, gender and learning from multi-media materials in 11-year-old children", British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(1), pp.43~56 (1999)
  48. Rogers, K. M. A., "A preliminary investigation and analysis of student learning style preferences", Journal of Further and Higher Education, 33(1), pp.13~21 (2009)
  49. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  50. Spada, N., "Developing a questionnaire to investigate second language learners’ preferences for two types of form-focused instruction", System, 37, pp.70~81 (2009)
  51. EFL classroom, "Cultural-specific perceptual preferences of post-secondary students of English as a second language, In Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Stebbins, C.
  52. EFL classroom, "Cognitive and learning styles of high school students: Implications for ESL curriculum development, In Learning styles in the ESL", pp.1995, Violand-Sanchez, E.
  53. Wintergerst, A., "Conceptualizing learning style modalities for ESL", EFL students, 2003, pp.31, 85~106
  54. Wong, L., "The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners", System, 39, pp.144~163 (2011)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)