Effects of Combined Use of Questioning and Indirect Feedback on L2 Writing
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper aims to analyze the effects of combined use of questioning by students and indirect feedback given by a teacher on writing activities. Twenty-three female college students in the experimental group were taught to question problematic words,structures, content, and organization of their drafts. The teacher in the study responded only to the questions asked by the students and gave some indirect feedback byunderlining the errors that had not been noticed by the students. They wrote three drafts which were later evaluated by three native English instructors. There were two rounds of interaction between students and teacher: one after the first draft and the other after the second draft. The average scores rated by the three native instructors were used to measure the effectiveness of combining the two methods of questioning and indirect feedback. The results of the paired sample T-test analyses indicate meaningful improvement in their third drafts, compared to the first ones. Among the fourcategories, the students improved significantly in accuracy. The results of thequestionnaire survey and reflective recalls reveal that the students found the combined use of the two methods helpful and effective. The analyses of some students' draftssupport these positive findings.
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the effects of combined use of questioning by students and indirect feedback given by a teacher on writing activities. Twenty-three female college students in the experimental group were taught to question problematic words,structures, content, and organization of their drafts. The teacher in the study responded only to the questions asked by the students and gave some indirect feedback byunderlining the errors that had not been noticed by the students. They wrote three drafts which were later evaluated by three native English instructors. There were two rounds of interaction between students and teacher: one after the first draft and the other after the second draft. The average scores rated by the three native instructors were used to measure the effectiveness of combining the two methods of questioning and indirect feedback. The results of the paired sample T-test analyses indicate meaningful improvement in their third drafts, compared to the first ones. Among the fourcategories, the students improved significantly in accuracy. The results of thequestionnaire survey and reflective recalls reveal that the students found the combined use of the two methods helpful and effective. The analyses of some students' draftssupport these positive findings.
참고문헌 (46)
- Antón, M., "Socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 54(3), pp.314~342 (1998)
- Becker, A., "Distinguishing linguistic and discourse features in ESL students' written performance", Modern Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(6), pp.406~424 (2010)
- Biber, D., "Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development?", TESOL Quarterly, 45(1), pp.5~35 (2011)
- Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support of written corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), pp.102~118 (2008)
- Brown, D., "The written corrective feedback debate : Next steps for classroom teachers and practitioners", TESOl Quarterly, 46(4), pp.861~867 (2012)
- Celce-Murcia, M., "Discourse analysis and grammar instruction", Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.135~151 (1990)
- 차경애, "대화식 저널 쓰기를 통한 중학생의 쓰기 능력 발달 사례 연구", 현대영어교육, 14(1), pp.243~265 (2013), 현대영어교육학회
- Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), pp.267~296 (2003)
- Choi, Kyunghee, "A study on effective strategies for reading English: A focus on socioaffective strategies", 박사, pp.2003
- Choi, Kyunghee, "Using students’ question notes as a means of communication between a teacher and students", Modern English Education, 5(1), pp.184~205 (2004)
- 최경희, "The Nature of Students' Participation and the Use of Strategies for English Reading", 영어학연구, 19(19), pp.113~133 (2005), 한국영어학학회
- 최연희, "Effects of Revision Training on L2 Writing", 영어교육, 65(1), pp.25~56 (2010), 한국영어교육학회
- Cohen, A. D., "Learner strategies in language learning", pp.57~69 (1987), Prentice Hall
- DiCamilla, F., "Repetition in the collaborative discourse of L2 learners : A Vygotskian perspective", The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(4), pp.609~633 (1997)
- Ferris, D., "Student reactions to the teacher response in multiple-draft composition classrooms", TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), pp.33~53 (1995)
- Ferris, D., "The influence of teacher commentary on student revision", TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), pp.315~337 (1997)
- Grant, L., "Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences", Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), pp.123~145 (2000)
- Hillocks, G. Jr., "Research on written composition: New directions for teaching", Paper presented at: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and the National Conference on Research in English (1986)
- Eli Hinkel, "Research Findings on Teaching Grammar for Academic Writing", 영어교육, 68(4), pp.3~21 (2013), 한국영어교육학회
- 황은경, "Syntactic Complexity of Korean EFL Learners’ Argumentative Writing", 현대영어교육, 14(2), pp.123~143 (2013), 현대영어교육학회
- Jacobs, H., "Testing ESL composition : A practical approach" (1981), Newbury House
- Johnson, R., "The relationship between score resolution methods and interrater reliability : An empirical study of an analytic scoring rubric", Applied Measurement in Education, 13(2), pp.121~138 (2000)
- Kim, Bu-Ja, "The Effects of Different Types of Form-Focused Instruction on Korean University Students' Writing Accuracy", 영어어문교육, 13(2), pp.63~90 (2007), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김부자, "The Combined Effects of Metalinguistic Explanation and Self-Correction on Improving EFL Writing Accuracy", 영어어문교육, 15(3), pp.83~104 (2009), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김부자, "Incorporating oral corrective feedback into the business English writing class", 영어어문교육, 17(3), pp.73~98 (2011), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김지현, "Learner Understanding of Written Corrective Feedback and Its Relationship with Immediate Uptake and Retention in EFL Classrooms", 영어교육, 68(3), pp.109~130 (2013), 한국영어교육학회
- 김양희, "The effectiveness of diverse types of written feedback: Comparative study of teacher and student feedback.", 영어어문교육, 16(4), pp.133~152 (2010), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Knoblauch, C. H., "Teacher commentary on student writing : The state of the art", Freshman English News, 10(2), pp.1~4 (1981)
- 이다미, "Is Negative Feedback Effective for L2 Acquisition?", 응용언어학, 20(2), pp.103~124 (2004), 한국응용언어학회
- Leeman, J., "Recasts and second language development : Beyond negative evidence", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25(1), pp.37~63 (2003)
- Leki, I., "Second language writing: Research insight for the classroom", pp.284~294 (1990), Cambridge University Press
- Li. H., "The role of revision and teacher feedback in a Chinese college context", Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), pp.230~239 (2007)
- Lim, Jeong-Wan., "A review of feedback research in second language writing", English Linguistic Science, 11, pp.75~87 (2003)
- Loughheed, L., "Longman new TOEIC : Introductory course" (2006), Longman
- O’Malley, J. M., "Learning strategy applications with students of English as a second language", TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), pp.557~584 (1985)
- Saito, H., "Teachers practices and students preferences for feedback on second language writing : A case study of adult ESL learners", TESOL Canada Journal, 11(2), pp.46~70 (1994)
- 신윤희, "Corrective Feedback Effects in University English Writing Classes", 영어어문교육, 19(3), pp.247~270 (2013), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 신유선, "Comparing Perceptions of Evaluative Criteria in EFL Writing Between Learner and Instructor Group", 영어어문교육, 17(1), pp.191~208 (2011), 한국영어어문교육학회
- Taguchi, N., "What linguistic features are indicative of writing quality? A case of argumentative essays in a college composition program", TESOL Quarterly, 47(2), pp.420~430 (2013)
- Vygotsky, L. S., "Mind in society : The development of higher psychological processes" (1978), Harvard University Press
- Well, G., "Using L2 to master L2 : A response to Antón and Dicamilla’s socio-cognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom", The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), pp.248~254 (1999)
- Wertsch, J. V., "Vygotsky and the social formation of mind" (1985), Harvard University Press
- Wertsch, J. V., "Perspectives on socially shared cognition", pp.85~100 (1991), American Psychological Association
- Yang, W., "Response to Biber, Gray, and Poonpon", TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), pp.187~191 (2013)
- Zamel, V., "The composing processes of advanced ESL students : Six case studies", TESOL Quarterly, 17(2), pp.165~187 (1983)
- Zhang, S., "Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class", Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(3), pp.209~222 (1995)
