이슬람국가(IS)와 알-카에다의 이념적 그리고 전략적 차이
Ideological and Strategic Difference between Islamic State and al-Qaeda
0
조회
0
다운로드
17
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
generate long-term instability in the Middle East. IS is an Sunni extremist organization which has a clear difference with the conventional Jihadist groups like al-Qaeda. IS and other Islamist groups have a similar ultimate goal of building an Islamic state, but they have different strategies and methodologies. The major targets of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda is ‘far enemy,’ i.e., the West led by the US and Israel, IS has prioritize ‘near enemy’ rather than 'far enemy’ cleansing the Muslim community. While Al-Qaeda seeks a ‘defensive jihad’ to protect the Islamic world from the threat posed the West, IS has combined the ‘defensive’ with ‘offensive jihad.’ IS has resorted to a strategy of building Islamic state to remove non-Islamic elements in the Middle East. This study explores how much ideology and strategy between al-Qaeda and IS are different. Despite the fact that the two radical Islamist organizations have utilized the religion of Islam to justify their activities and atrocities, this research assumes that IS, which declaredthe establishment of Khalifa state, has more assertively put the emphasis on its territorial domination and governance than al-Qaeda did. In order to demonstrate the ideological and strategic difference between the two organizaton, this study analyzed the speeches made by the main leaders of the two groups, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Osama bin Laden. The texts in the speeches of the two leaders were analyzed through the KH Coder. The result of the analysis showed considerable differences in word usage and co-occurrence networks.
Abstract
generate long-term instability in the Middle East. IS is an Sunni extremist organization which has a clear difference with the conventional Jihadist groups like al-Qaeda. IS and other Islamist groups have a similar ultimate goal of building an Islamic state, but they have different strategies and methodologies. The major targets of Osama bin Laden's al-Qaeda is ‘far enemy,’ i.e., the West led by the US and Israel, IS has prioritize ‘near enemy’ rather than 'far enemy’ cleansing the Muslim community. While Al-Qaeda seeks a ‘defensive jihad’ to protect the Islamic world from the threat posed the West, IS has combined the ‘defensive’ with ‘offensive jihad.’ IS has resorted to a strategy of building Islamic state to remove non-Islamic elements in the Middle East. This study explores how much ideology and strategy between al-Qaeda and IS are different. Despite the fact that the two radical Islamist organizations have utilized the religion of Islam to justify their activities and atrocities, this research assumes that IS, which declaredthe establishment of Khalifa state, has more assertively put the emphasis on its territorial domination and governance than al-Qaeda did. In order to demonstrate the ideological and strategic difference between the two organizaton, this study analyzed the speeches made by the main leaders of the two groups, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi and Osama bin Laden. The texts in the speeches of the two leaders were analyzed through the KH Coder. The result of the analysis showed considerable differences in word usage and co-occurrence networks.
참고문헌 (30)
- Alshech, Eli, "The Doctrinal Crisis within the Salafi-Jihadi Ranks and the Emergence of Neo-Takfirism", Islamic Law and Society, 21, pp.1~34 (2014)
- Barnett, Richard, "Foreign Fighters in Syria" (2014), The Soufan Group
- Berman, Sheri, "Islamism, Revolution and Civil Society", Perspectives on Politics, 1, pp.257~272 (2003)
- Burke, Jason, "Al Qaeda", Foreign Policy, ~ (2004)
- Cavatorta, Francesco, "The War on Terrorism: Perspectives from Radical Islamic Groups", Irish Studies in International Affairs, 16, pp.35~50 (2005)
- 11 Devolution: the Failed Jihadist Struggle against the Near and Far Enemy, "Al-Qaeda’s Post-9", pp.2014, Celso, Anthony
- Eido, Issam, "ISIS: The Explosion of Narratives – The Land of the Revolution between Political and Metaphysical Eternities", Jadaliyya, ~ (2014)
- Gambhir, Harleen, "Dabiq: The Strategic Messaging of the Islamic State", Institute for the Study of War: Backgrounder, ~ (2014)
- Gerges, Fawaz A., "The Future of Al Qaeda", Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 22(Autumn) (2011)
- Gibbons-Neff, Thomas, "ISIS: not alone in their conquest of Iraq", Washington Post, ~ (2014)
- Fawaz A. Gerges, "The Far Enemy: Why Jihad Went Global" (2009), Cambridge University Press
- Hegghammer, Thomas, "The Rise of Muslim Foreign Fighters:Islam and the Globablization of Jihad", International Security, 35, pp.53~94 (2010)
- Hegghammer, Thomas, "Global Jihadism after the Iraq War", The Middle East Journal, 60(Winter), pp.11~32 (2006)
- Holden, Michael, "Syrian conflict putting al-Qaeda militants closer to Europe", Reuters, ~ (2013)
- "The Evolution of Al Qaeda’s Strategy after Afghanistan" (2012)[URL]
- "The rise of al-Qaedaism" (2007)[URL]
- The ‘Islamic State’Crisis and U.S. Policy, "Katzman, Kenneth", Congressional Research Service, ~ (2014)
- McCormick, Gordon, "Things Come Together: Symbolic Violence and Guerrilla Mobilisation", Third World Quarterly, 28, pp.295~320 (2007)
- "A strategic mistake – ISIS beheads a member of Harakat Ahrar al-Sham" (2013)[URL]
- Qutb, Sayyid, "Milestones" (2007), Dar al-Ilm
- "The Next Generation of Terror" (2008)[URL]
- Sageman, Marc, "Understanding terror networks" (2004), University of Pennsylvania Press
- Saltman, Erin, "Islamic State: The Changing Face of Modern Jihadism", Quilliam, pp.1~72 (2014)
- Sinclair, Kirstine, "Whose Caliphate? The Ideology and Geo-politics of Islamic State", Center for Mellemoststudier, ~ (2014)
- Sly, Liz, "Al-Qaeda disavows any ties with radical Islamist ISIS group in Syria, Iraq", The Washington Post, ~ (2014)
- "Hussein’s prewar ties to al-Qaeda discounted" (2014)[URL]
- Wiktorowicz, Quintan, "A Genealogy of Radical Islam", Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 28, pp.75~97 (2005)
- Zaidi, Manzar, "A taxonomy of jihad", Arab Studies Quarterly, 31, pp.21~34 (2009)
- Zelin, Aaron, "The War between IS and al-Qaeda for Supremacy of the Global Jihadist Movement", Research Notes:The Washington Institute for Near East Policy, 20, pp.1~11 (2014)
- "The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has a Consumer Protection Office" (2014)[URL]