拓跋 鮮卑의 동물 문양
Animal ornaments of Tuoba Xianbei
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article presents a study only on the animal ornaments reflected in the artefacts founded in the tombs of Tuoba Xianbei. Ornaments and motifs represent important part of a culture – it’s spiritual side which means it shows morals, believes and ideas about afterlife. In their turn those aspects lead people’s daily life, their behavior, their relations with each other and other nations. That is why a study on the animal ornaments, and nature ornaments in whole, is a must in understanding daily life of the nation in connection with its spiritual culture. Animal ornaments in the current article are divided into three big groups: mammals and birds and mythological creatures. Mammals are represented by ungulates (even-toed and odd-toed) and carnivora. Birds are divided only in two types: real and mythological. In connection to these typical motifs author gives personal opinion on each ornament as well as description of them and their possible or explicit relations with other cultures. Then author cannot leave such question as differences of relevant ornaments between Tuoba and Murong Xianbei. Therefore, there are presented some points from the Tuoba perspective, which means there are some more different parts but they are connected with Murong Xianbei’s tradition. And for the conclusion author pinpoint discussed differences in brief and present them in the tables for the convenience.
Abstract
This article presents a study only on the animal ornaments reflected in the artefacts founded in the tombs of Tuoba Xianbei. Ornaments and motifs represent important part of a culture – it’s spiritual side which means it shows morals, believes and ideas about afterlife. In their turn those aspects lead people’s daily life, their behavior, their relations with each other and other nations. That is why a study on the animal ornaments, and nature ornaments in whole, is a must in understanding daily life of the nation in connection with its spiritual culture. Animal ornaments in the current article are divided into three big groups: mammals and birds and mythological creatures. Mammals are represented by ungulates (even-toed and odd-toed) and carnivora. Birds are divided only in two types: real and mythological. In connection to these typical motifs author gives personal opinion on each ornament as well as description of them and their possible or explicit relations with other cultures. Then author cannot leave such question as differences of relevant ornaments between Tuoba and Murong Xianbei. Therefore, there are presented some points from the Tuoba perspective, which means there are some more different parts but they are connected with Murong Xianbei’s tradition. And for the conclusion author pinpoint discussed differences in brief and present them in the tables for the convenience.
참고문헌 (29)
- 무흐타로바 G., "카자흐스탄 이식역사문화박물관의 고고연구과제", 2018 Asian Archaeology 국제학술심포지엄 – 유라시아의 고대문화 최신 발굴성과, pp.69~99 (2018)
- 민병훈, "유라시아의 십이지 문화" (2019), 진인진
- 실리체바 스베틀라나, "古墳 出土 遺物에 反映된 拓跋·慕容 鮮卑의 自然 모티프 分析", 석사, pp.2020
- 吉林省文物工作队, "吉林榆树县老河深鲜卑墓群部分墓葬发掘简报", 文物, 2 (1985), 文物出版社
- 內蒙古文物考古硏究所, "扎賚諾尔古墓群1986年淸理發掘報告", 內蒙古文物考古集, 1 (1994)
- 內蒙古自治區博物館, "和林格尔县另皮窖村北魏墓出土的金器", 內蒙古文物考古, 3 (1984)
- 大同市博物馆, "大同东郊北魏元淑墓", 文物, 8, pp.57~65 (1989), 文物出版社
- 大同市博物馆, "大同东郊北魏元淑墓", 文物, 8 (1989), 文物出版社
- 大同市博物馆, "大同方山北魏永固陵", 文物, 7 (1978), 文物出版社
- 洛阳博物馆, "洛陽北魏元邵墓", 考古, 4 (1973), 中国社会科学院考古研究所
- 辽宁省文物考古硏究所, "遼寧省文物考古硏究所藏文物精华" (2012), 科学出版社
- 辽宁省博物馆, "北燕冯素弗墓" (2015), 文物出版社
- 刘嫌, "遼寧義縣保安寺發現的古代墓葬", 考古, 1 (1963), 中国社会科学院考古硏究所
- 尚晓波, "朝阳王子坟山墓群. 1987, 1990年度考古发掘的主要收获", 文物, 11 (1987), 文物出版社
- 倪润安, "內蒙古三道湾和东大井墓地为檀石槐鲜卑遗存论", 考古, 3, pp.88~89 (2011), 中国社会科学院考古硏究所
- 魏堅, "內蒙古地區鮮卑墓葬的发現与硏究" (2004), 科學出版社
- 伊克坚, "土默特左旗出土北魏时期文物", 內蒙古文物考古, 3 (1984)
- 程道宏, "伊敏河地区的鲜卑墓", 內蒙古文物考古集, 2 (1982)
- 郑隆, "內蒙古扎賚諾尔古墓群调查记", 文物, 9, pp.16~19 (1961), 文物出版社
- 郑隆, "內蒙古扎賚諾尔古墓群调查记", 文物, 9 (1961), 文物出版社
- 河南省博物馆, "河南安阳北齐范粹墓发掘简报", 文物, 1 (1972), 文物出版社
- Alekseev A.Yu, "Zoloto skifskikh tsarei", Gosudarstvennyi Ermitaj, ~ (2012)
- Atdaev S. J., "Svedeniya o dikikh koshkakh Turkmenistana (v zapiskakh issledovatelei XIX – nachala XX v.)", Narody i religii Evrazii, 1(14), pp.31~34 (2018)
- Geniatulin R.F., "red. “Duroiskaya kul’tura.” Malaya entsiklopediya Zabaikalya. Arkheologiya", Nauka, ~ (2011)
- Golan A., "Mif i Simvol" (1993), Russlit
- Khudyakov Yu.S., "Syanbi i Yuzhnaya Sibir’", Drevnosti Altaya. Izvestiya laboratory arkheologii, (4), pp.163~169 (1999)
- Komissarov S.A., "“Syanbei – «plemya edinoroga».” Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya 100 let gynnskoi arkheologii. Nomadizm proshloye, nastoyashcheye v global’nom kontekste i istoricheskoi perspektive. Gunnskyi fenomen ch. I", 31~33 (1996)
- Tokarev S.A., "red., “Pavlin,” «Mify narodov mira». Entsiklopediya, t. 2, Bol’shaya Rossyiskaya entsiklopediya", ~ (1991)
- Volnaya G.N., "Obraz barana v prikladnom iskusstve kobanskoi kul’tury i traditsionnoi kul’ture naseleniya Tsentral’nogo Kavkaza", Izvestiya SOIGSI, 21(60), pp.5~23 (2016)