본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

생활양식에 따른 전통 부츠(Boots)형 신발의 비교 고찰 ― 몽골 부족과 중국동북지역 소수민족을 중심으로 ―

A Comparative Study on the Traditional Boots Type-Shoes According to Lifestyle- Centered on the Mongolian tribe and ethnic minorities in northeast China -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study was intended to compare the types of boot-type shoes and the formative characteristics of Mongol and northeastern China, which developed shoe culture that reflected different lifestyles. Precedence research and literature data, fieldwork and survey data, exhibition and video data were utilized as research materials. First, Shilyu, the ancestor of the ethnic minorities in Mongolia and northeastern China, confirmed that the culture of dress and shoes, which were mainly made of animal skins and fish skins obtained through hunting and fishing, was developed. Based on this, the types and characteristics of traditional boot-type shoes of the Mongol tribe and ethnic minorities in northeastern China were examined, and the results of comparing the formative characteristic were as follows. First, it can be seen that Mongolia's Gutal has developed into three forms depending on the method and type; A flat sole with a round type of the toe-cap, A flat sole with the toe-cap raised, A shape in which the sole covers both sides of the foot and foot. Boot-type shoes of ethnic minorities in northeastern China were each made of animal and fish skins to enhance functionality and practicality, and different materials were used according to the seasons. Second, I compared the formative features of each ethnic group's boot-type shoes with the way and purpose of wearing them. As a result, the basic forms are similar, but differences have been seen in such things as subdivided forms, fabrication methods, materials, colors and how to wear them. The difference shown in the formative characteristics means that it has developed into boot-type shoes with different types and characteristics by the function and use of the lifestyle according to the natural and environmental background of the area in which it has lived and to adapt to it. In conclusion, each region's boot-type shoes can be identified as a costume item that is very close to Mongolia's nomadic and horseback riding styles and the lifestyle of ethnic minorities in northeastern China, such as hunting, fishing and ranching.

Abstract

This study was intended to compare the types of boot-type shoes and the formative characteristics of Mongol and northeastern China, which developed shoe culture that reflected different lifestyles. Precedence research and literature data, fieldwork and survey data, exhibition and video data were utilized as research materials. First, Shilyu, the ancestor of the ethnic minorities in Mongolia and northeastern China, confirmed that the culture of dress and shoes, which were mainly made of animal skins and fish skins obtained through hunting and fishing, was developed. Based on this, the types and characteristics of traditional boot-type shoes of the Mongol tribe and ethnic minorities in northeastern China were examined, and the results of comparing the formative characteristic were as follows. First, it can be seen that Mongolia's Gutal has developed into three forms depending on the method and type; A flat sole with a round type of the toe-cap, A flat sole with the toe-cap raised, A shape in which the sole covers both sides of the foot and foot. Boot-type shoes of ethnic minorities in northeastern China were each made of animal and fish skins to enhance functionality and practicality, and different materials were used according to the seasons. Second, I compared the formative features of each ethnic group's boot-type shoes with the way and purpose of wearing them. As a result, the basic forms are similar, but differences have been seen in such things as subdivided forms, fabrication methods, materials, colors and how to wear them. The difference shown in the formative characteristics means that it has developed into boot-type shoes with different types and characteristics by the function and use of the lifestyle according to the natural and environmental background of the area in which it has lived and to adapt to it. In conclusion, each region's boot-type shoes can be identified as a costume item that is very close to Mongolia's nomadic and horseback riding styles and the lifestyle of ethnic minorities in northeastern China, such as hunting, fishing and ranching.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "魏書", ~
  2. "北史", ~
  3. "隨書", ~
  4. "舊唐書", ~
  5. "新唐書", ~
  6. B. Suvd, "Secret history of Mongol costume" (2015), Academy of National Costumes research
  7. Frances Kennett, "Ethnic Dress: A Comprehensive Guide to the Folk Costume of the World", Facts on File, ~ (1995)
  8. Henny Harald Hansen, "Mongol Costumes" (1950), BEANCO LUNOS BOGTRUKKERI KØOBENHAVN
  9. Tsultem, N., "Mongolian Arts and Crafts" (1987), State Publishing House
  10. 吴爱群, "鄂伦春族服饰文化传承研究", 碩士, pp.2011
  11. 강순제, "한국복식사전" (2015), 민속원
  12. 고순희, "동북․내몽골지역 중국소수민족이 착용한 모피와 피혁류 복식의 유형과 특성", 복식, 60(4), pp.58~75 (2010), 한국복식학회
  13. 국립민속박물관, "유라시아 문화. 만남으로의 여행" (2010), 국립민속박물관
  14. 김인희, "최후의 수렵민 어룬춘족" (2016), 청아출판사
  15. 단국대학교 몽골연구소, "동북아유목문화사전" (2017), 단국대학교출판부
  16. 동북아역사재단 북방사연구소, "숲속의사람들, 어원커족" (2018), 동북아역사재단
  17. 동북아역사재단 한중관계연구소, "아무르강의어렵민허저족" (2017), 청아출판사
  18. 라시드 앗 딘, "라시드 앗 딘의 집사1 부족지" (2005), ㈜사계절출판사
  19. 박춘순, "중국소수민족복식" (2002), 민속원
  20. 엄순천, "중국 문헌 속 북방지역 소수종족과 퉁구스족과의 관계 규명: 순록 관련 기록을 중심으로", 러시아학, 17, pp.125~153 (2018), 러시아 • 알타이지역 연구소[DOI]
  21. 윤양노, "遊牧ㆍ騎馬民族 靴의 구조적 특성과 유형 연구", 중앙아시아연구, 21(1), pp.25~47 (2016), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  22. 윤은숙, "북아시아 유목민의 역사 요람 興安嶺 - 몽골족의 활동을 중심으로", 역사문화연구, (39), pp.101~134 (2011), 역사문화연구소
  23. 이호정, "아시아 신발의 類型과 變遷", 박사, pp.2016
  24. 이호정, "아시아 북방유목민족 부츠형 신발의 조형적 특징과 변천", 몽골학, (62), pp.97~135 (2020), 한국몽골학회[DOI]
  25. 이안나, "몽골의 생활과 전통" (2014), 민속원
  26. 张琳, "赫哲族鱼皮艺术" (2013), 哈尔滨工程大学出版社
  27. 张敏杰, "猎民绝艺 : 鄂伦春族狍皮制作技艺" (2011), 黑龍江人民出版社
  28. 장성은, "슈즈디자인과 패턴메이킹" (2012), 교문사
  29. 장지우허, "몽골인 그들은 어디서 왔나" (2009), 소나무
  30. 조선희, "한국 · 몽골의 신 문화 비교 연구-화(靴)를 중심으로-", 한복문화, 9(2), pp.59~65 (2006), 한복문화학회
  31. 체.어트겅바야르, "최신 몽골어 한국어 사전" (2011), 문예림
  32. 최소영, "13~14세기 몽골의 침입과 지배에 대한 티베트인들의 인식", 중앙아시아연구, 23(1), pp.67~99 (2018), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  33. 최영순, "몽골 참(Tsam) 복식에 관한 고찰", 중앙아시아연구, 14, pp.189~210 (2009), 중앙아시아학회[DOI]
  34. 최해율, "20세기 초 몽골복식유물의 기원과 형태의 상징에 관한 연구", 몽골학, (21), pp.263~290 (2006), 한국몽골학회
  35. 최정, "유목민의 꽃- 몽골여자복식의 흐름(한국학술진흥재단 박사논문 출판지원 결과물: 전문교양도서)" (2008), 민속원

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)