가축분뇨시용이 하계사료작물의 생산성 및 유기가축 사육능력에 미치는 영향
Effects of Applying Livestock Manure on Productivity and Organic Stock Carrying Capacity of Summer Forage Crops
1
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study was carried out to estimate the selection of appropriate forage crops, proper application levels of livestock manure, and carrying capacity per unit area for organic livestock, as influenced by livestock manure application levels compared with chemical fertilizer to corn and sorghum × sorghum hybrid, in order to produce organic forages by utilizing livestock manure. For both corns and sorghum × sorghum hybrids, no fertilizer plots had significantly (p<0.05) lower annual dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) yields than those of other plots, whereas the N+P+K plots ranked the highest yields, followed by 150% cattle manure plots and 100% cattle manure plots. Dry matter, CP and TDN yields of cattle manure plots were significantly (p<0.05) higher than those of no fertilizer and P+K plots. In applying cattle manure, the yields of cattle slurry plots tended to be a little higher than those of composted cattle manure plots. Assuming that corns and sorghum × sorghum hybrids produced from this trial were fed at 70% level to 450kg of Hanwoo heifer with 400g of average daily gain, livestock carrying capacity (head/year/ha) ranked the highest in N+P+K plots of the case of corns (mean 6.7 heads), followed by 150% cattle slurry plots (mean 5.6 heads), 150% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.8 heads), 100% cattle slurry plots (mean 4.4 heads), 100% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.3 heads), P+K plots (mean 4.1 heads), and no fertilizer plots (mean 3.1 heads). Meanwhile, in case of sorghum × sorghum hybrids, N+P+K plots (mean 5.7 heads) ranked the highest carrying capacity, followed by 100~150% cattle slurry plots (mean 4.8~5.2 heads), 150% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.7 heads), 100 % composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.3 heads), P+K plots (mean 3.8 heads), and no fertilizer plots (mean 3.4 heads). The results indicated that replacing chemical fertilizer by livestock manure application to cultivation soil for forage crops could enhance not only DM and TDN yields, but also organic stock carrying capacity. In conclusion, it was conceived that organic forage production by reutilizing livestock manure might contribute to reduced environmental pollution and the production of environment friendly agricultural products through resources recycling.
Abstract
This study was carried out to estimate the selection of appropriate forage crops, proper application levels of livestock manure, and carrying capacity per unit area for organic livestock, as influenced by livestock manure application levels compared with chemical fertilizer to corn and sorghum × sorghum hybrid, in order to produce organic forages by utilizing livestock manure. For both corns and sorghum × sorghum hybrids, no fertilizer plots had significantly (p<0.05) lower annual dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) yields than those of other plots, whereas the N+P+K plots ranked the highest yields, followed by 150% cattle manure plots and 100% cattle manure plots. Dry matter, CP and TDN yields of cattle manure plots were significantly (p<0.05) higher than those of no fertilizer and P+K plots. In applying cattle manure, the yields of cattle slurry plots tended to be a little higher than those of composted cattle manure plots. Assuming that corns and sorghum × sorghum hybrids produced from this trial were fed at 70% level to 450kg of Hanwoo heifer with 400g of average daily gain, livestock carrying capacity (head/year/ha) ranked the highest in N+P+K plots of the case of corns (mean 6.7 heads), followed by 150% cattle slurry plots (mean 5.6 heads), 150% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.8 heads), 100% cattle slurry plots (mean 4.4 heads), 100% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.3 heads), P+K plots (mean 4.1 heads), and no fertilizer plots (mean 3.1 heads). Meanwhile, in case of sorghum × sorghum hybrids, N+P+K plots (mean 5.7 heads) ranked the highest carrying capacity, followed by 100~150% cattle slurry plots (mean 4.8~5.2 heads), 150% composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.7 heads), 100 % composted cattle manure plots (mean 4.3 heads), P+K plots (mean 3.8 heads), and no fertilizer plots (mean 3.4 heads). The results indicated that replacing chemical fertilizer by livestock manure application to cultivation soil for forage crops could enhance not only DM and TDN yields, but also organic stock carrying capacity. In conclusion, it was conceived that organic forage production by reutilizing livestock manure might contribute to reduced environmental pollution and the production of environment friendly agricultural products through resources recycling.
참고문헌 (23)
- 김문철, "돈분 액비 시용이 피의 생산성, 토양 특성 및 용탈수의 화학적 조성에 미치는 영향", 한국초지학회지, 26(4), pp.257~266 (2006), 한국초지학회
- 나훈찬, "우분액비 및 톱밥발효돈분 시용이 사일리지용 옥수수 생산성 및 양분용탈에 미치는 영향", 한국초지학회지, 26(4), pp.177~186 (2006), 한국초지학회
- 농림부, "한우사양표준", ~ (2002)
- 박병훈, "조사료자원학", pp.201~233 (2005)
- 유덕기, "가축분뇨의 배출규제 문제와 처리개선 방안", 2002년 한국유기농업학회 학술발표 대회, pp.3~27 (2002)
- 자연순환형 유기농업 표준모델개발, "유덕기", 농림부, ~ (2006)
- 이주삼, "유휴 논톤양에서 조사료 생산을 위한 적정 액상구 비 시용수준의 추정Ⅰ. 액상구비의 시용이 Reed canarygrass의 연 건물수량에 미치는 영향", 한초지, 14(1), pp.50~56 (1994)
- 조익환, "지역별 순환농업의 유형에 관한 연구", 한국유기농업학회지, 11(3), pp.7~108 (2003), 한국유기농업학회
- 조익환, "유휴 논토양에서 가축분뇨의 시용이 Tall fescue의 잠재생산성에 미치는 영향", 한국유기농업학회지, 14(1), pp.69~83 (2006), 한국유기농업학회
- 조익환, "가축분뇨시용이 옥수수와 수수×수수교잡종의 생산성 및 사료가치에 미치는 영향", 한국유기농업학회지, 16(1), pp.115~125 (2008), 한국유기농업학회
- 황경준, "미생물 발효제 처리 돈분액비 시용이 사료작물 생산성 및 토양의 이화학적 성상에 미치는 영향", 한국초지학회지, 26(4), pp.293~ (2006), 한국초지학회
- A.O.A.C., "Official Methods of Analysis" (1990), Association of Official Analytical Chemists
- Bracker, H. H., "Gülle - Streßfaktor für die Grünlandpflanzengesellschaft - Betriebswirt-schftl. Mitteilg. der Landwirtschaftskammer Schlesweig-holstein, S", 21~28 (1982)
- Brockman, J. S., "A mathematical relationship between nitrogen input and output in cut grass sward", J. Br. Grassl. Soc, 26, pp.75~77 (1971)
- Goering, H. K., "Forage fiber analysis. USDA Agric. Handbook No. 379, Washington, D.C.", ~ (1970)
- Herriott, J. B., "Gülle as a grassland fertilizer (part 3)", J. Br. Grassl. Soc, 20(2), pp.129~138 (1965)
- Jo, I. H., "Wirksamkeit der mineralischen Stickstoffdüngung auf Ertrag und Pflan-zenbestand des Grünlandes im österreichischen Alpenraum. Diss. Univ. Bodenkultur. Wien", ~ (1989)
- Jorgensen. N. A., "Corn silage for Wisconsin cattle, Coop. Ext. Programs, Univ. of Wis. A1178", ~ (1972)
- Linn, J., "Forage quality tests and interpretation. Univ. of Minnesota Ext. Serv. AG-FO-2637", ~ (1989)
- Mengel P., "Ernährung und Stoffwechsel der Pflanze. 6 überarbeitete Auflage", ~ (1984)
- Nahm, K. H., "Practical guide to feed, forage and water analysis", pp.1~70 (1992), Yoohan Pub.
- SAS, "Statistical Analysis System ver., 8. 01" (2005), SAS Institute Inc.
- Schechtner, G., "Zur Wirksamkeit des Güllestickstoffs auf dem Grünland in Abhän-gigkeit vom Düngungsregime", Die Bodenkultur, 29, pp.351~371 (1978)
