본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대학시설관리를 위한 평가분류체계 및 평가항목 개발 연구

A Study on the Development of the Assessment Category and Items for University Facility Management

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류건축공학

초록

For university facility and space management to be public, and to increase the administrational efficiency, this research suggests an efficient as well as an objective evaluation system/index to allow national and university finances to contribute towards higher education. According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into two categories; quality and space management. First, quality management is subdivided into three groups in order for quantitative management, school site and building area, secured building, and financial affairs and expense management. In order for an effective and appropriate space management, the second category of space management proposes seven subdivisions. Based on these subdivisions, quality management on university facility contains 10 evaluation items with marking system which allows perfect score of 50 points. The space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points. Therefore, this study developed total of 29 evaluation items for university facility management with marking system that allows perfect score of 150 points. The suggested evaluation system and items will be used as a valuable foundation for efficient and objective university facility management.

Abstract

For university facility and space management to be public, and to increase the administrational efficiency, this research suggests an efficient as well as an objective evaluation system/index to allow national and university finances to contribute towards higher education. According to the result of this study, evaluation system for university facility can be widely divided into two categories; quality and space management. First, quality management is subdivided into three groups in order for quantitative management, school site and building area, secured building, and financial affairs and expense management. In order for an effective and appropriate space management, the second category of space management proposes seven subdivisions. Based on these subdivisions, quality management on university facility contains 10 evaluation items with marking system which allows perfect score of 50 points. The space management category contains 19 evaluation items and the marking system allows perfect score of 100 points. Therefore, this study developed total of 29 evaluation items for university facility management with marking system that allows perfect score of 150 points. The suggested evaluation system and items will be used as a valuable foundation for efficient and objective university facility management.

참고문헌 (10)

  1. 대학시설공간의 효율적 활용에 관한 연구, "교육인적자원부", ~ (2007)
  2. 대학특성화 추진방안, "교육인적자원부", ~ (2005)
  3. 대학혁신과 경쟁력 연구보고서, "류지성", 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2006)
  4. 대학 M&A 등 자율경영혁신모델연구, "이현청", 교육인적자원부, ~ (2003)
  5. 공간비용채산제, 대학혁신발표자료, , 경상대학교, ~ (2006)
  6. 대학혁신과 경쟁력, , 삼성경제연구소, ~ (2006)
  7. 친경건축물(Green Building) 인증제도(공동주택, 주거복합, 업무용), "건설교통부.환경부", ~ (2002)
  8. 좋은건축물 지정제도 도입방안 연구, , 행정중심복합도시건설청, ~ (2007)
  9. Impact on Space of Future Change in High Education - Planning the Future of American Campus, , ~ (2006)
  10. Postsecondary Education Fcilities Inventory and Classification Manual(FICM):2006 Edition, "Kren L. Cyros", ~ (2006)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)