儒學視域下的《論佛骨表》小考
A brief examination of "On the Bone List of Buddha" from the perspective of Confucianism
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
唐代是佛教傳入中國以來,最爲興盛的時代。唐代曆來君主均對佛教禮遇有加,均有過關於崇佛的大型祭祀活動。韓愈是唐宋八大家之一,是佛教最大的“反對派”,也是新儒學的開拓者。韓愈的名篇《論佛骨表》是史上著名的反佛檄文,其中言辭激烈地反對唐憲宗即將進行的“奉迎佛骨”祭祀活動,明確表達了自己排佛的立場和決心。本文擬從儒學的角度出發,通過《論佛骨表》中對“奉迎佛骨”事件的反對和論證,分析韓愈的儒學觀與唐代佛教發展的對立和沖突,沖突包括:倫理觀、身體觀、祭祀觀以及對民眾教化等方面。本文也試圖從儒家思想的角度分析韓愈此次上疏唐憲宗的失誤之處,以及《論佛骨表》在對後世的影響。
Abstract
Han Yu was the biggest "opponent" of Buddhism and the pioneer of Neo-Confucianism. Han Yu's famous essay "On the Table of Buddha's Bones" is a well-known anti-Buddha essay in history, in which he fiercely opposes the upcoming sacrificial activity of "welcoming the Buddha's bones" to Emperor Tang Xianzong, and clearly expresses his stance and determination to eliminate Buddha. From the perspective of Confucianism, this paper intends to analyze the opposition and conflict between Confucianism and Buddhism in the Tang Dynasty, including the concept of ethics, the view of the body, the concept of sacrifice, and the education of the people. This article also attempts to analyze the mistakes of Han Yu's distancing of the Tang Dynasty from the perspective of Confucianism, as well as the influence of the "On the Buddha's Bone Table" on later generations.
참고문헌 (24)
- 陳寅恪, "陳寅恪 : 論韓愈", 曆史研究, (二) (1954)
- 韓愈, "韓愈文集彙校箋注" (2017), 中華書局
- 錢穆, "中國近三百年學術史" (1987), 中華書局
- 苏轼, "苏轼文集 卷十七" (1985), 中華書局
- 郭預衡, "唐宋作大家文鈔" (2002), 廣東教育出版社
- 董誥, "傳世藏書·集庫,總集7-12全唐文 1-6", 海南國際新聞出版中心
- 吴钢, "全唐文补遗(第一辑)" (1994), 三秦出版社
- 王溥, "唐會要" (2017), 中華書局
- 白居易, "白居易集" (1985), 中華書局
- 劉昫, "《舊唐書》卷一百七十四" (1975), 中華書局
- 孟二冬, "韓孟詩傳" (2003), 吉林人民出版社
- 張魯原, "中華古諺語大辭典" (2011), 上海大學出版社
- 朱熹, "四書章句集注" (1983), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑒" (2011), 中華書局
- 陶宗儀, "說郛三種" (1988), 上海古籍出版社
- 韓愈, "韓愈文集彙校箋注" (2017), 中華書局
- 劉寧, "從《論佛骨表》看韓愈崇儒排佛思想中的身體關切", 北京大學學報, 59(2)
- 何晏, "論語注疏" (1997), 上海古籍出版社
- 王先謙, "荀子集解" (1988), 中華書局
- 歐陽修, "新唐書" (1988), 中華書局
- 司馬光, "資治通鑒" (1976), 中華書局
- 韓愈, "韓昌黎集: 5冊" (1930), 商務印書館
- 鄭道傳, "佛氏雜辨陽村權近序,三峰集,卷9", ~
- 金基永, "韓愈의 佛敎排斥과 麗末鮮初의 排佛論", 國民倫理硏究, (42) (1999), 韓國國民倫理學會
