본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전통계급과 복색의 변화현상 -한·중 왕복 색명의 상징적 의미 상관-

Change in Colors of the Costume According to the Traditional Classes - Focus on the Color Symbol of King’s Costume-

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의상

초록

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to make people to grasp better understanding of traditional colors, especially the colors of ceremonial costume, Myunbok(冕服) and Sangbok(常服), which were known to be made for kings and emperors. Myunbok was Chinese traditional ceremonial costume with Jik-Ryung (straight collars). Sangbok originated from west Asia to china and it was made with Dan-Ryung (round collars).Myunbok was composed of a long jacket and a skirt. The color of the long jacket is black(玄) which symbolized the heaven. The color of the skirt is Yellowish-red(), which means the earth. Therefore, these two colors were used only for kings and emperors. Sangbok was composed of a out robe and inner wears. The color of the robe in Sangbok was red(緋色) in Buk-ju(北周), but was changed into yellow in Sui(隋) dynasty. But it was changed gradually reddish-yellow color and was continued until Wing(元) dynasty. The reason why it was that particular color, reddish-yellow is because of the symbol of the powerful authority of the emperor. In Ming(明) dynasty, the color changed back to yellow. At this time, the twelve patterns on the robe had far more emphasis than the colors.The red color was the symbol of lower level than the yellow. In Chosun dynasty of Korea, all kings except Kojong(高宗) used red color in their robes. It meant that the king of Chosun stands lower than the emperors of China. However, the color used on the robes for kings was deep-red(大紅色) to distinguish between the king and the others. Besides, deep-red also meant the authority of kings. Thus, black, yellowish-red, yellow, deep-red, and reddish-yellow were the symbols of emperors and kings.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. "조선시대 복식의 적색계와 자색계 색명 체계", pp.36~ (2004)
  2. "한 중 단령의 비교연구", pp.21~ (1987)
  3. "中國古代服飾史", pp.177~178 (1984), 北京 中國戱劇出版社
  4. "p.141. 2006. 1. 12. 투고", 1. 22 심사, pp.1981[DOI]
  5. "전통염색의이해", pp.62~ (2000), 부산 보광출판사
  6. "복식에 나타난 전통색의 비교연구", pp.40~ (1998)
  7. "의 담황포 가 상복 용이었고 그 외 상복이라고 기재한 것은 모두 상시복 을 의미하는 것이다."
  8. "증보한국복식사 연구", pp.147~ (1979), 아세아문화사
  9. "한국복식사에 나타난 전통색 연구", pp.177~178 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)