본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

Intervention Effects on Reconstruction: with Focus on NPI and –man ‘only’

3

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates the intervention effects on the reconstruction of scrambled elements in Korean. It has been often noted in the literature that in certain contexts, a scrambled element induces an intervention effect in conjunction with LF wh-movement in Korean (Beck & Kim 1997). Crucially, what is assumed here is that the scrambled element does not reconstruct, contrary to the standard assumption that scrambled elements can (optionally) reconstruct (Saito 1992). The paper aims to resolve this paradoxical situation. We show that the anti-reconstruction effect is detected only with certain focus elements (e.g. NPI, –man ‘only’ and wh-phrase). Specifically, it is shown that these focus elements may not reconstruct across another intervening focus. We also present data that exhibit a more direct intervention effect such that the relevant construction becomes unacceptable due to the inevitable conflict between reconstruction and the constraint.

Abstract

This paper investigates the intervention effects on the reconstruction of scrambled elements in Korean. It has been often noted in the literature that in certain contexts, a scrambled element induces an intervention effect in conjunction with LF wh-movement in Korean (Beck & Kim 1997). Crucially, what is assumed here is that the scrambled element does not reconstruct, contrary to the standard assumption that scrambled elements can (optionally) reconstruct (Saito 1992). The paper aims to resolve this paradoxical situation. We show that the anti-reconstruction effect is detected only with certain focus elements (e.g. NPI, –man ‘only’ and wh-phrase). Specifically, it is shown that these focus elements may not reconstruct across another intervening focus. We also present data that exhibit a more direct intervention effect such that the relevant construction becomes unacceptable due to the inevitable conflict between reconstruction and the constraint.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Ahn, Sung-Ho, "Korean Quantification and Universal Grammar", Doctoral, pp.1990
  2. 배수영, "The Relaxation of Radical Reconstruction in Korean Long-distance Scrambling", 생성문법연구, 30(3), pp.315~336 (2020), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  3. 배수영, "Further Notes on Intervention Effects on Reconstruction", 언어와언어학, (92), pp.211~236 (2021), 언어연구소
  4. Beck, Sigrid, "Wh-Constructions and Transparent Logical Form", Doctoral, pp.1996
  5. Beck, Sigrid, "On Wh-and operator Scope in Korean", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6, pp.339~384 (1997)
  6. Beck, Sigrid, "Intervention Effects Follow from Focus interpretation", Natural Language Semantics, 14(1), pp.1~56 (2006)
  7. Bobaljik, Jonathan David, "Word Order and Scope:Transparent Interfaces and the 3", 4 Signature, 2012, pp.43(3), 371~421
  8. Bošković, Željko, "Scrambling and Last Resort", Linguistic inquiry, 29, pp.347~366 (1998)
  9. Chomsky, Noam, "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  10. Cinque, Guglielmo, "Types of A-dependencies" (1990), MIT Press
  11. Cresti, Diana, "Extraction and Reconstruction", Natural Language Semantics, 3, pp.79~122 (1995)
  12. Eriewine, Michael Yoshitaka, "Intervention tracks scope-rigidity in Japanese", Paper presented at the Conference of Linguistic Society of America (2018)
  13. Fox, Danny, "Economy and Semantic Interpretation" (2000), MIT Press
  14. Hoji, Hajime, "Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structure in Japanese", Doctoral, pp.1985
  15. 황주현, "What Intervenes What?: the Flip Side of Intervention Effects", 어학연구, 47(2), pp.219~244 (2011), 언어교육원
  16. Jayaseelan, K. A, "Question Words in Focus Positions", Linguistic Variation Yearbook, 3, pp.69~99 (2003)
  17. Kim, Shin-Sook, "Intervention Effects are Focus Effects", Japanese, 2002, pp.10, 615~628
  18. Kim, Shin-Sook, "Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics XI", pp.520~533 (2006)
  19. Kotek, Hadas, "Covert Pied-piping in English Multiple Wh-questions", Linguistic Inquiry, 47(4), pp.669~693 (2008)
  20. Krifka, Manfred, "The Semantics and Pragmatics of Polarity Items", Linguistic Analysis, 25, pp.209~257 (1995)
  21. Kroch, Anthony, "Amount Quantification, Referentiality, and Long Wh-movement", Ms, pp.1989
  22. Lahiri, Utpal, "Focus and Negative Polarity in Hindi", Natural Language Semantics, 6, pp.57~123 (1998)
  23. Lakoff, George, "Semantics", pp.232~296 (1971), Cambridge University Press
  24. Langacker, Ronald, "Modern Studies in English", pp.160~186 (1969), Prentice Hall
  25. Longobardi, Giuseppe, "The syntax of noun phrases", pp.57~112 (1987)
  26. Lee, Youngjoo, "Scope of Focus Particles: abstract ONLY in Korean", Proceedings of the Conference “sub8 -Sinn und Bedeutung” (2004)
  27. Lee, Young-Suk, "Any as Indefinite Plus Even", Ms, pp.1994
  28. May, Robert, "The grammar of quantification", Doctoral, Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, pp.1977
  29. May, Robert, "Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation" (1985), MIT Press
  30. Moon, Gui-Sun, "Intervention Effect and the Morpheme –man", Studies in Generative Linguistics, 18, pp.349~373 (2008)
  31. Park, Bum-Sik, "Identity and Locality in Ellipsis", Doctoral, pp.2005
  32. 박범식, "Notes on NPI-scrambling and Intervention Effects in Korean", 생성문법연구, 31(2), pp.329~342 (2021), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  33. Rullmann, Hotze, "Maximality in the Semantics of Wh-constructions", Doctoral, pp.1995
  34. Saito, Mamoru, "Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications", Doctoral, pp.1985
  35. Saito, Mamoru, "Alternative conceptions of phrase structure", pp.182~200 (1989), University of Chicago Press
  36. Saito, Mamoru, "Long-distance Scrambling in Japanese", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, pp.69~118 (1992)
  37. Saito. Mamoru, "A derivational Approach to the Interpretation of Scrambling Chains", Lingua, 13, pp.481~518 (2003)
  38. Saito, Mamoru., "Further Notes on the Interpretation of Scrambling Chain", ms, pp.2006
  39. Sells, Peter, "Three Aspects of Negation in Korean", Journal of Linguistic Studies, 6, pp.1~15 (2001)
  40. Sohn, Keun-Won, "Negative Polarity Items, Scope, and Economy", Doctoral, pp.1995
  41. Semantics: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research, "Semantik: Ein Handbuch der Zeitgenössischen Forschung", pp.1991, Stechow, Arnim von
  42. Suh, Jinhee, "Scope Phenomena and Aspects of Korean Syntax", Doctoral, pp.1990
  43. JinheeSuh, "Non-QR Analysis for Scope Interaction in Korean and English:An approach in the "Probe-Goal" System", 언어, 27(4), pp.601~616 (2002), 한국언어학회
  44. Tada, Hiroaki, "A", A’ Partition in Derivation, MIT, 1993
  45. Tanaka, Hidekazu, "Invisible Movement in sika-nai and the Linear Crossing Constraint", Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 6, pp.143~188 (1997)
  46. Tanaka, Hidekazu, "Remarks on Beck's effects: Linearity in Syntax", Linguistic Inquiry, 34, pp.314~323 (2003)
  47. Tomioka, Satoshi, "Pragmatics of LF intervention Effects: Japanese and Korean Interrogatives", Journal of Pragmatics, 39, pp.1570~1590 (2007)
  48. Wurmbrand, Susi, "QR and Selection: Covert Evidence for Phasehood", Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistics Society Annual Meeting, 42, pp.277~290 (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)