본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

L2 Learners’ Awareness of Transitivity Bias of English Lexical Verbs: A Corpus-based Comparative Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

Verb biases have received significant attention in the field of psycholinguistics due to their important role in sentence processing and as facilitators in comprehension. Thjs study seeks to identify advanced L2 learners’ awareness of the transitivity bias of English lexical verbs in L2 English essays produced by-bidding 202 Korean university students. The study compares corresponding data from a corpus of native students. In addition to investigating the usage frequency of lexical verbs and conducting a transitivity error analysis, the distributions of three types of verbs by different transitivity biases- high-transitive (HT), mid-transitive (MT), and no-transitive (NT) verbs-, were examined qualitatively as well as quantitatively. The results revealed similar distributions of frequent lexical verbs and verb types by transitivity bias with a significantly higher frequency of HT across the two corpora, despite some minor variables between them. The usage patterns of the three verb types in transitive constructions were similar between L2 learners and native college students. Second, Korean learners’ incorrect use of transitivity bias accounted for 2.21% of all errors, with 12 errors for the NT category and 6 errors for the HT category. However, no errors were observed in the top 50 most frequent verbs. These results verify that the more frequently L2 verbs are used, the higher sensitivity to transitivity learners obtain; this confirms the prediction derived from the Entrenchment Hypothesis. The study also showed that L2 learners have an awareness of obligatory prepositions in intransitive constructions despite having difficulty in realizing a specific preposition in production. From a developmental perspective, greater opportunities of exposure to negative as well as positive evidence of less frequently used verbs need to be provided for advanced L2 learners to reinforce their awareness of the transitivity bias.

Abstract

Verb biases have received significant attention in the field of psycholinguistics due to their important role in sentence processing and as facilitators in comprehension. Thjs study seeks to identify advanced L2 learners’ awareness of the transitivity bias of English lexical verbs in L2 English essays produced by-bidding 202 Korean university students. The study compares corresponding data from a corpus of native students. In addition to investigating the usage frequency of lexical verbs and conducting a transitivity error analysis, the distributions of three types of verbs by different transitivity biases- high-transitive (HT), mid-transitive (MT), and no-transitive (NT) verbs-, were examined qualitatively as well as quantitatively. The results revealed similar distributions of frequent lexical verbs and verb types by transitivity bias with a significantly higher frequency of HT across the two corpora, despite some minor variables between them. The usage patterns of the three verb types in transitive constructions were similar between L2 learners and native college students. Second, Korean learners’ incorrect use of transitivity bias accounted for 2.21% of all errors, with 12 errors for the NT category and 6 errors for the HT category. However, no errors were observed in the top 50 most frequent verbs. These results verify that the more frequently L2 verbs are used, the higher sensitivity to transitivity learners obtain; this confirms the prediction derived from the Entrenchment Hypothesis. The study also showed that L2 learners have an awareness of obligatory prepositions in intransitive constructions despite having difficulty in realizing a specific preposition in production. From a developmental perspective, greater opportunities of exposure to negative as well as positive evidence of less frequently used verbs need to be provided for advanced L2 learners to reinforce their awareness of the transitivity bias.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Ades, Anthony, "On the order of words", Linguistics and Philosophy, 4, pp.517~558 (1982)
  2. Ambridge, Ben, "The effect of verb semantic class and verb frequency (entrenchment)on childrens’ and adults’ graded judgements on argument-structure overgeneralization errors", Cognition, 106, pp.87~129 (2008)
  3. Annelie, Adel, "Recurrent word combinations in academic writing by native and non-native speakers of English: A lexical bundles approach", English for Specific Purposes, 31, pp.81~92 (2012)
  4. Arai, Manabu, "The use of verb-specific information for prediction in sentence processing", Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), pp.525~560 (2013)
  5. Balcom, P, "Why is this happened? Passive Morphology and Unaccusativity", Second Language Research, 13(1), pp.1~9 (1997)
  6. Biber, Douglas, "Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English" (1999), Person Education
  7. Boland, Julie E, "The role of verb argument structure in sentence processing:Distinguishing between syntactic and semantic effects", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22, pp.133~152 (1993)
  8. Bowerman, Melissa, "Explaining Language Universals", pp.73~101 (1988), Basil Blackwell
  9. Braine, Martin D. S., "Beyond Names for Things: Young Children’s Acquisition of Verbs", pp.352~376 (1995), Erlbaum
  10. Brooks, Patricia J., "How children constrain their argument structure constructions", Language, 75(4), pp.720~738 (1999)
  11. Brooks, Patricia J., "Young Children’s Overgeneralizations with Fixed Transitivity Verbs", Child Development, 70(6), pp.1325~1337 (1999)
  12. Chomsky, Noam, "Aspects of a thoery of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  13. Chung, Taegoo, "Multiple factors in the L2 acquisition of English unaccusative verbs", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 52(1), pp.59~87 (2014)
  14. Cortes, Viviana, "Lexical bundles in published and student disciplinary writing:examples from history and biology", English for Specific Purposes, 23, pp.397~423 (2004)
  15. Frenck-Mestre, C., "Syntactic ambiguity resolution while reading in second and native languages", Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A, pp.119~148 (1997)
  16. Friedmann, Naama G., "The Leaf fell (the leaf): the online processing of unaccusatives", Linguistic Inquiry, 39, pp.355~377 (2008)
  17. Gahl Susanne, "Verb subcategorization frequencies: American English corpus data, methodological studies, and cross-corpus comparisons", Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, &Computers, 36(3), pp.432~443 (2004)
  18. Garnsey, Susan M, "The contributions of verb bias and plausibility to the comprehension of temporarily ambiguous sentences", Journal of Memory & Language, 37, pp.58~93 (1997)
  19. Hochberg, Judith G, "Children’s judgments of transitivity errors", Journal of Child Language, 13, pp.317~334 (1986)
  20. 황종배, "Why Do Korean EFL Learners Overpassivize English Unaccusative Verbs?", 영어교육연구, 18(1), pp.195~221 (2006), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  21. Hyland, Ken, "Academic clusters: Text patterning in published and postgraduate writing", International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 18(1), pp.41~62 (2008)
  22. Jennings, F. Randall, Billi, "Graded effects of verb subcategory preferences on parsing: Support for constraint-satisfaction models", Language and Cognitive Processing, 12(4), pp.485~504 (1997)
  23. Ju, Minkyong, "Overpassivization errors by second language learners", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.85~111 (2000)
  24. Kennison, Shelia M, "American English usage frequencies for noun phrase and tensed sentence complement-taking verbs", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, pp.165~177 (1999)
  25. 김기택, "Sensitivity to ungrammatical object drop in English by Korean young and adult L2 learners", 언어연구, 32, pp.57~81 (2015), 언어정보연구소[DOI]
  26. 김지현, "A Comparative Study of Native and Non-native Speakers’ Use of Verb Subcategorization Information in Written English Production", 영어학연구, 23(2), pp.115~134 (2017), 한국영어학학회[DOI]
  27. Kittila, Seppo, "Remarks on the basic transitive sentence", Language Sciences, 24(2), pp.107~130 (2002)
  28. Kondo, Takako, "Overpassivization in second language acquisition", International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(2), pp.129~161 (2005)
  29. Lapata, M., "Verb frame frequency as a predictor of verb bias", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, pp.419~435 (2001)
  30. Levin, Beth, "Unaccusativity: At the syntax-lexical semantics interface" (1995), MIT Press
  31. Marslen-Wilson, W., "The temporal structure of spoken language understanding", Cognition, 8, pp.1~71 (1980)
  32. 민주영, "Korean EFL Learners’ Recognition of English Obligatory Adjuncts", 어학연구, 49(2), pp.169~203 (2013), 언어교육원
  33. Mitchell, Don C, "Attention and Performance 12: The Psychology of Reading", pp.601~618 (1987)
  34. Montrul, Silvian, "Transitivity alternations in L2 acquisition: Toward a modular view of transfer", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.229~273 (2001)
  35. Oshita, Hiroyuki, "The Unaccusative Trap: L2 Acquisition of English Intransitive Verbs", Doctoral, pp.1997
  36. 박혜선, "Syntax-pragmatics Interface in L2 Learning: The Case of Obligatory Adjuncts in English", 영미어문학, (87), pp.175~197 (2008), 한국영미어문학회
  37. Perlmutter, David, "Impersonal passives and the unaccusative hypothesis", Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society, pp.157~192 (1978)
  38. Pickering, Martin J., "Ambiguity resolution in sentence processing: evidence against frequency-based accounts", Journal of Memory and Language, 43, pp.447~475 (2000)
  39. Pinker, Steven, "Learnability and Cognition: The Acquisition of Argument Structure" (1989), MIT Press
  40. Parker, Frank, "Linguistics for Non-Linguists" (2005), Pearson
  41. 표시연, "Is Missing Prepositions in English Relative Clauses due to Insensitivity to Transitivity?", 영어어문교육, 21(3), pp.173~193 (2015), 한국영어어문교육학회
  42. Randall, J. H., "The Unaccusativity Puzzle: Explorations of the Syntax-Lexicon Interface", pp.332~352 (2004), Oxford University Press
  43. Rice, Sally, "Transitivity and the lexicon", Center for Research in Language, 2(2), pp.3~9 (1987)
  44. Song, Namsong, "Thematic Relations and Transitivity in English, Japanese, and Korean" (1993), University of Hawaii Press
  45. Staub, Adrian, "The parser doesn't ignore intransitivity, after all", Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(3), pp.550~569 (2007)
  46. Traxler, Matthew J, "Plausibility and subcategorization in temporarily ambiguous sentences: evidence from self-paced reading", Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 34(1), pp.1~30 (2005)
  47. Traxler, Matthew J, "Priming of early closure: evidence for the lexical boost during sentence comprehension", Language, Cognition, and Neuroscience, 30(4), pp.479~490 (2015)
  48. Treble, H. A., "An A.B.C. of English Usage" (1936), Oxford University Press
  49. 양재희, "Testing L2 Learners’ Sensitivity to Transitivity Bias in English Verbs", 언어와언어학, (79), pp.97~124 (2018), 언어연구소[DOI]
  50. Yip, Virginia, "Interlanguage and Learnability" (1995), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)