Enriched Composition in Conceptual Semantics and the Generative Lexicon Theory

참고문헌 (25)

1. "A well-known case of reference transfer that was first observed by Nunberg is an waitress's statement like" (1979)
2. "The ham sandwich in the corner wants some more coffeeHere the reference of the ham sandwich is literally transferred to the customer eating the ham sandwich in the corner A similar case that is discussed much in Jackendoff is the reference transfer of a visual representation"
3. "General see-Q'Do you General Lee Swunsin over there?'In General Lee Swunsin transfers the reference to the statue of the general Another example of reference transfer is found in", ceki I Swunsin cangkwun poici?over there Lee S
4. "car while ku swul chwihan nom-i na-lul chiessethe drink drunken man-NOM me hit'While I was driving carefully yesterday both swul chwihan nom 'the drunken man' and na 'I", me' refer to the two vehicles driven by the drunken man and me respectively, ~
5. "Jackendoff's proposed rules of interpretation for"
6. , ~
7. , ~
8. "Lambda extraction provides a natural analysis for the reference transfer sentences"
9. "but it also predicts that we cannot transfer the reference of the visual representation to the original figure that the statue we cannot transfer the reference of General Lee's statue to General Lee himself whereas we can transfer the reference of General Lee to his statue"
10. "General statue-GEN biography'the statue of General Lee's biography'", *I Swunsin cangkwun tongsang-uy iltaykiLee S
11. "The reference transfer of the vehicle occurs only if the person is inside the car; hence is not correct when it intends to mean 'Inho washed his own car'"
12. "'To express this intuition in a conceptual semantic event description"
13. "we have the prediction that Inho's car cannot transfer its reference to Inho"
14. "Inho's car was shot while driving'"
15. "is ungrammatical with the intended meaning of 'Inho was shot while he was driving his car'; it makes sense only when it was the car that was shot while he was driving it 2 Indirect questionIn order to interpret the sentences in we need to reconstruct the relevant indirect questions from the object NPs", (t inho)
16. "should be understood as 'Inho asked what time it was' Lambda extraction provides a useful tool to extract an argument from the conceptual representation of an indirect question once to extract the Wh- variable and the second time to extract TIME", NAME, 34~
17. "3 Lambda extraction of the event variableLambda extraction is also useful to account for the aspectual coercion data the time adverbial twu sikan tongan 'for two hours' gives the sentence the meaning of repetition" (1999)
18. "Inho-ka kyeytan-eyse ttwiesstaI-NOM stairs-in", from jumped'Inho jumped from the stairs'b Inho-ka twu sikan tongan kyeytan-eyse ttwiesstatwo hours while'Inho jumped from the stairs for two hours', ~
19. "Inho-ka keysok kil-ul kennesstacontinuously'Inho kept crossing the road'The time adverbials like twu sikan tongan and keysok require the modified predicate to be an on-going event Predicates like ttwi- 'to run' and ket- 'to walk' do not lexically denote an on-going event; hence the aspectual type of these predicates needs to be coerced into an on-going event One way of getting the coerced readings in examples is to lambda-extract the event variable and to selectively bind the event variable by the time adverbials the variable with the time adverbial twu sikan tongan 'for two hours' as shown in"
20. "I have shown that lambda extraction provides a natural account for many problematic empirical data; in the next subsection I am presenting independent support for enriched composition from binding and control provides a detailed discussion of the multiple thematic roles of buy In sentences like Sue bought a book from Bill Sue pays money to Bill and gets a book from him; at the same time Bill gets the money from Sue The verb buy necessarily involves two changes of possession one for money and the other for the purchased entity shows the conceptual structure for buy" (1990)
21. "X bought Y from Zb is that X is the source of money and the target of Y simultaneously and that Z is the source of Y and the target of money simultaneously The multiple theta roles associated with X and Z in pose a problem for Chomsky's X is expressed as an obligatory argument in syntax is expressed as an oblique in syntax", (w) (1981)
22. "Inho-nun kakkak-uy haksayngtul-eykeyse chayk-ul I-TOP each-GEN students-from book-ACC han kwenssik sasstaone volume bought'Inho bought a book from each student'As Jackendoff a book changed possession from x to Inho and money changed possession from Inho to x The problem is that the two x's in the logical translation never appear as syntactic arguments but are expressed explicitly only in semantics Jackendoff uses this and numerous other grammatical phenomena as evidence for expressing the binding relation in semantics This in turn means that the meaning composition that necessarily shows the binding relation should look into the internal semantics of the verb buy an argument for enControl also supports the view of enriched composition support the view of semantic does not consistently play the role of controller for both get and promise" (1997), since the syntactic subject
23. OBJ or Recipient control?, , ~
24. SUBJ or Source control? verbs like shikhi- and myenglyengha- whereas verbs like yaksokha- 'to promise' require the source control, , jackendoff1997, ~
25. "be'Mina is as rich as Inho'b"

관련 논문AI추천