본문 바로가기
KERD
논문

On Negative Answers to Polar Questions in English

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This paper investigates negative answers to polar questions in English. Focusing on Kramer and Rawlins’ (2009) and Holmberg’s (2013, 2016) elliptical approaches to polar answers, we show that their analyses fall short of capturing all the relevant data. We argue that a modification of Holmberg’s (2016) analysis of negative polar answers is optimally necessary. In particular, we suggest that Holmberg’s analysis needs to be modified by incorporating and extending Kramer and Rawlins’ assumption that the negative answer particle no requires a negative concord chain. It is also shown that the proposed analysis can best be instantiated under the PF-deletion approach to ellipsis, rather than the LF-copying approach advanced in Holmberg’s system. We also explore the possibility of extending the proposed analysis to negative reactions/rejoinders to statements.

Abstract

This paper investigates negative answers to polar questions in English. Focusing on Kramer and Rawlins’ (2009) and Holmberg’s (2013, 2016) elliptical approaches to polar answers, we show that their analyses fall short of capturing all the relevant data. We argue that a modification of Holmberg’s (2016) analysis of negative polar answers is optimally necessary. In particular, we suggest that Holmberg’s analysis needs to be modified by incorporating and extending Kramer and Rawlins’ assumption that the negative answer particle no requires a negative concord chain. It is also shown that the proposed analysis can best be instantiated under the PF-deletion approach to ellipsis, rather than the LF-copying approach advanced in Holmberg’s system. We also explore the possibility of extending the proposed analysis to negative reactions/rejoinders to statements.

참고문헌 (20)

  1. Chomsky, Noam, "Syntax: An International Handbook of Contemporary Research. Vol. 1", pp.506~569 (1993), Walter de Gruyter
  2. Goodhue, Daniel, "On Asking and Answering Biased Polar Questions", Doctor, pp.2018
  3. Goodhue, Daniel, "Intonation, yes and no", Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 3(1), pp.1~45 (2018)
  4. Halliday, Michale, "Cohesion in English" (1976), Longman
  5. Holmberg, Anders, "The Syntax of Answers to Polar Questions in English and Swedish", Lingua, 128, pp.31~50 (2013)
  6. Holmberg, Anders, "The Syntax of Yes and No" (2016), Oxford University Press
  7. Kramer, Ruth, "Polarity Particles: An Ellipsis Account", Proceedings of North East Linguistics Society (NELS), 39, pp.479~492 (2009)
  8. Krifka, Manfred, "Response Particles as Propositional Anaphors", Semantics and linguistic theory, 23, pp.1~18 (2013)
  9. Laka, Itziar, "Negation in Syntax: On the Nature of Functional Categories and projections", Doctor, pp.1990
  10. Laka, Itziar, "On Syntax of Negation" (1994), Routledge
  11. Merchant, Jason, "The Syntax of Silence" (2001), Oxford University Press
  12. Merchant, Jason, "Fragments and Ellipsis", Linguistics and Philosophy, 27(6), pp.661~738 (2004)
  13. 박범식, "Notes on Yes as a Rejoinder and a Polar Answer", 생성문법연구, 32(2), pp.353~376 (2022), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  14. 박범식, "Answering and Reacting with Yes and No to Complex Questions", 생성문법연구, 32(3), pp.589~603 (2022), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
  15. Park, Bum-Sik, "Polarity Items in Polar Answers", Ms
  16. Roelofsen, Floris, "Polarity Particle Responses as a Window onto the Interpretation of Questions and Assertions", Language, 91(2), pp.359~414 (2015)[DOI]
  17. Williams, Edwin, "Discourse and Logical Form", Linguistic Inquiry, 8, pp.101~139 (1977)
  18. Wiltschko, Martina, "Word Order and Syntactic Structure", pp.241~280 (2017), Language Science Press
  19. Zeijlstra, Hedde, "Sentential Negation and Negative Concord", Doctor, pp.2004
  20. Zeijlstra, Hedde, "Modal Concord", Semantics and Linguistic Theory, 17, pp.317~332 (2007)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)