본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Meaning of the Cotton “Wulf” Maxim in the Context of Anglo-Saxon Popular Thought and Culture.

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

The sixty-six lines of the Cotton Maxims (Maxims II) consist of a series of so-called gnomic verses which are supposed to be "pieces of universally accepted knowledge in the form of versified sentences." In reading of Maxims II, however, readers are puzzled over how the whole poem could be understood as a unit, for some of the maxims, including the "wulf" maxim, are not look like "pieces of universally accepted knowledge" to modern ears. The crux of the poem is its ambiguous use of "the reiterated sceal or scyle," for the whole work of Maxims II, "the various items of the sceal series," "are exceedingly difficult to connect in any logical or even emotional sequence, although sometimes two or three items do have a demonstrable relationship." The paper focuses on the interpretation of the "wulf" maxim, expounding the Anglo-Saxon concept of "wulf" and identifying the specific meaning of sceal in the context of Anglo-Saxon popular thought and culture. The literal translation of the wolf gnome of Maxims II is quite simple either in two ways: "the wolf, wretched solitary being, is typically in the forest" or "the wolf, wretched solitary being, ought to be in the forest." However, in content, the gnome is not so simple. In order to interpret the gnome in a precise and proper way, modern readers should recognize the Anglo-Saxon's way of thinking, their culture, and both their pagan and Christian belief in nature and God. "The wolf, wretched solitary being, is typically in the forest" is our interpretation; "The wolf, wretched solitary being, ought to be in the forest" is their interpretation.

Abstract

The sixty-six lines of the Cotton Maxims (Maxims II) consist of a series of so-called gnomic verses which are supposed to be "pieces of universally accepted knowledge in the form of versified sentences." In reading of Maxims II, however, readers are puzzled over how the whole poem could be understood as a unit, for some of the maxims, including the "wulf" maxim, are not look like "pieces of universally accepted knowledge" to modern ears. The crux of the poem is its ambiguous use of "the reiterated sceal or scyle," for the whole work of Maxims II, "the various items of the sceal series," "are exceedingly difficult to connect in any logical or even emotional sequence, although sometimes two or three items do have a demonstrable relationship." The paper focuses on the interpretation of the "wulf" maxim, expounding the Anglo-Saxon concept of "wulf" and identifying the specific meaning of sceal in the context of Anglo-Saxon popular thought and culture. The literal translation of the wolf gnome of Maxims II is quite simple either in two ways: "the wolf, wretched solitary being, is typically in the forest" or "the wolf, wretched solitary being, ought to be in the forest." However, in content, the gnome is not so simple. In order to interpret the gnome in a precise and proper way, modern readers should recognize the Anglo-Saxon's way of thinking, their culture, and both their pagan and Christian belief in nature and God. "The wolf, wretched solitary being, is typically in the forest" is our interpretation; "The wolf, wretched solitary being, ought to be in the forest" is their interpretation.

참고문헌 (26)

  1. Bosworth,Joseph., "The Anglo-Saxon Dictionary" (1898), Oxford: Clarendon
  2. Campbell,Jackson J., "Ends and Meanings: Modes of Closure in Old English Poetry." Medievalia Et Humanistica: Studies in Medieval and Renaissance Culture. New Series, Number 16. Ed. Paul Maurice Clogan. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield", 1~50 (1988)
  3. Davis,Norman., "Sweet's Anglo-Saxon Primer" (1953), Oxford: Clarendon
  4. Edlin, H. L., "The Changing Wildlife of Britain" (1952), London: B. T. Batsford
  5. Eliason, Norman E., "Wulfhli(Beowulf, I.1358)", Journal of English and German Philology, 34, pp.20~23 (1935)
  6. Greenfield, Stanley B, "Daniel Gillmore Calder, and Michael Lapidge. A New Critical History of Old English Literature" (1986), New York: New York UP
  7. Henry, Patrick L., "The Early English and Celtic Lyric" (1966), London: Allen & Unwin
  8. Hill, Tomas D., "Notes on the Old English Maxims I and II", Notes and Queries, 215, pp.445~447 (1970)
  9. Holinshed's Chronicles, "New York: AMS", 1 (1965)
  10. Holthausen, Von F., "Altenglisches Etymologisches W terbuch" (1932), Heidelberg: Carl Winter
  11. Kennedy,Charles M., "The Earliest English Poetry" (1943), London: Oxford UP
  12. Mackie,W.S.ed., "The Exeter Book, Part II. London: Oxford UP, 1934. The Early English Text Society 194(1934)", ~ (1934)
  13. Mercatante,Anthony S.ed., "The Facts on File Encyclopedia of World Mythology and Legend" (1988), New York and London: Facts on File
  14. The Oxford English Dictionary., "The Oxford English Dictionary" (1989), Oxford: Clarendon
  15. Rowland,Beryl., "Blind Beasts: Chaucer's Animal World" (1971), Chatham England: The Kent State UP
  16. Str , Hilmer., "Old English Personal Names in Bede's History: An Etymological-Phonological Investigation. Stockholm: C. W. K. Gleerup, 1939. Lund Studies in English 8", ~ (1939)
  17. Strutt,Joseph., "The Sports and Pastimes of the People of England" (1898), London: Chatto & Windus
  18. Sweet,Henry,ed., "An Anglo-Saxon Reader" (1894), Oxford: Clarendon
  19. Sweet,Henry,ed.The Oldest English Texts.London:Trubner, "The Oldest English Texts. London: Trubner, 1885. The Early English Text Society 83", ~ (1885)
  20. Taylor, Paul Beekman., "Heroic Ritual in the Old English Maxims", Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 70.3, pp.387~407 (1967)
  21. Traill,H.D.,ed., "Social England. 6 vols. London: Cassell, 1898. Vol. 1", ~ (1898)
  22. Wrenn,C.L., "A Study of Old English Literature" (1967), London: George G. Harrap
  23. Maxims I., "http:", neu, pp.ascp, a03_13.htm
  24. "http:", wordpressmu, pp.mdrout, category[DOI]
  25. "Maxims II. http:", neu, pp.ascp, al5.htm
  26. "http:", OldEnglish, pp.aelfric, edmund.html

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)