본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『리틀 도릿』에 나타난 카니발 문체

The Carnivalesque Style in Little Dorrit

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This article focuses on the style of Charles Dickens's representative novel Little Dorrit in the carnivalesque point of view of M. M. Bakhtin. So far we have known Dickens’s novels only as comic ones, including lots of socially critical meanings. But we couldn’t clearly make sure of the clear reasons why such novels are so interesting and critical alike, and couldn't also know exactly what their styles are like. That is why we want to approach his language, concerned with the humor and social criticism in Little Dorrit, on the basis of Bakhtinian concepts. As a famous popular writer Dickens always wanted to make his readers know what the ideological absurdities were in his society while reading his novels interestingly. Accordingly he criticized various problems in his society through the relevant styles, phrases, lines, etc., which his readers already knew well. These can be called heteroglossia totally in a Bakhtinian term. Because of this narrative method his language has an inclination to be hybridized and, as a result, be overflowed with many meanings in the social, historical, and cultural contexts in his age. In Bakhtin's standpoint such novels can be said to have as many viewpoints as the heteroglossia hybridized there. By comic-parodic re-processing method, as Bakhtin said, Dickens could hybridize a variety of heteroglossia, create a carnivalesque style stimulating his readers’ interest and taking out their positive responses, while maintaining the proper distance in his narration, and, as Bakhtin indicated, avoid its pathos-charged, Sentimental narration. Moreover Dickens succeeded in making his narrator extol his criticized characters, and such false praises look like those of many other people by hybridizing different voices, such as public opinion. He reaccentuated his socio-critical intentions by making the false praises so objective and persuasive. So Bakhtin calls this case an example of pseudo-objective motivation. Little Dorrit has many examples making such praises objective, but eventually ridiculous, by parodying the Biblical, epic, lyric styles, and so forth, especially in the narrations concerned with the Merdles and the Barnacles. However Dickens praises some overpowered characters like Amy Dorrit by parodying the historical and epic styles. Especially in the case of using lyric style here, it can be called a parody in that her story isn't like that of William Wordsworth's heroine, Lucy parodied here. In Dickens’s narration all conventional values tend to be upside-down, and for such reason, his humor can be believed to be carnivalesque.

Abstract

This article focuses on the style of Charles Dickens's representative novel Little Dorrit in the carnivalesque point of view of M. M. Bakhtin. So far we have known Dickens’s novels only as comic ones, including lots of socially critical meanings. But we couldn’t clearly make sure of the clear reasons why such novels are so interesting and critical alike, and couldn't also know exactly what their styles are like. That is why we want to approach his language, concerned with the humor and social criticism in Little Dorrit, on the basis of Bakhtinian concepts. As a famous popular writer Dickens always wanted to make his readers know what the ideological absurdities were in his society while reading his novels interestingly. Accordingly he criticized various problems in his society through the relevant styles, phrases, lines, etc., which his readers already knew well. These can be called heteroglossia totally in a Bakhtinian term. Because of this narrative method his language has an inclination to be hybridized and, as a result, be overflowed with many meanings in the social, historical, and cultural contexts in his age. In Bakhtin's standpoint such novels can be said to have as many viewpoints as the heteroglossia hybridized there. By comic-parodic re-processing method, as Bakhtin said, Dickens could hybridize a variety of heteroglossia, create a carnivalesque style stimulating his readers’ interest and taking out their positive responses, while maintaining the proper distance in his narration, and, as Bakhtin indicated, avoid its pathos-charged, Sentimental narration. Moreover Dickens succeeded in making his narrator extol his criticized characters, and such false praises look like those of many other people by hybridizing different voices, such as public opinion. He reaccentuated his socio-critical intentions by making the false praises so objective and persuasive. So Bakhtin calls this case an example of pseudo-objective motivation. Little Dorrit has many examples making such praises objective, but eventually ridiculous, by parodying the Biblical, epic, lyric styles, and so forth, especially in the narrations concerned with the Merdles and the Barnacles. However Dickens praises some overpowered characters like Amy Dorrit by parodying the historical and epic styles. Especially in the case of using lyric style here, it can be called a parody in that her story isn't like that of William Wordsworth's heroine, Lucy parodied here. In Dickens’s narration all conventional values tend to be upside-down, and for such reason, his humor can be believed to be carnivalesque.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. 성은애, "Charles Dickens 문체의 소설적 기능: Bleak House와 Great Expectation을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1994
  2. 베르그송, 앙리, "웃음", 세계사
  3. Bakhtin, M. M, "Art and Answerability: Early Philosophical Essays" (1990), University of Texas Press
  4. Bakhtin, M. M, "Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics" (1984), the University of Minnesota Press
  5. Bakhtin, M. M, "Discourse in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays", pp.259~421 (1981), University of Texas Press
  6. Bakhtin, M. M, "“Epic and Novel: Toward a Methodology for the Study of the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays", pp.3~41 (1981), University of Texas Press
  7. Bakhtin, M. M, "“Forms of Time and the Chronotope in the Novel.” The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays", pp.84~258 (1981), University of Texas Press
  8. Bakhtin, M. M, "peech Genres and Other Late Essays", pp.1~9 (1986), University of Texas Press
  9. Dickens, Charles, "David Copperfield" (2000), The Modern Library
  10. Dickens,Charles, "Little Dorrit" (1998), Penguin Books Ltd.
  11. Dickens,Charles.The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club,ed, "The Posthumous Papers of the Pickwick Club" (1999), Penguin
  12. Frye, Northrop, "“Dickens and the Comedy of Humours.” Modern Critical Views 85: Charles Dickens", pp.71~92 (1987), Chelsea House Publishers
  13. Grant,Allan, "A Preface to Dickens" (1984), Longman
  14. Kincaid. James R, "Dickens and the Rhetoric of Laughter" (1971), Oxford University Press
  15. Manning, Bank Sylvia, "Dickens as Satirist" (1971), Yale University
  16. Miller, J. Hillis, "Charles Dickens: The World of his Novels" (1965), Harvard University Press
  17. Morson, Gary Saul, "Mikhail Bakhtin: Creation of a Prosaics" (1990), Stanford University Press
  18. Schlicke, Paul, "Dickens and Popular Entertainment" (1985), Allen & Unwin
  19. Stewart, Garrett, "“Dickens and Language.” The Cambridge Companion to Charles Dickens", pp.136~151 (2001), Cambridge University Press
  20. Stone, Harry, "ickens and the Invisible World.: Fairy Tales, Fantasy, and Novel-Making" (1979), Indiana University Press
  21. Voloshinov. V. N, "Marxism and the Philosophy of Language" (1986), Harvard University Press
  22. Williams, Raymond, "“Dickens and Social Ideas.” Dickens: 1970" (1970), Chapman & Hall
  23. Williams, Raymond, "The English Novel: from Dickens to Lawrence" (1974), Paladin
  24. Williams, Raymond, "Writing in Society" (1984), Verso

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)