독일의 기소강제절차와 일본의 부심판절차에 비추어 본 우리나라 재정신청제도의 개정방향
Judicial Control on Prosecutorial Power in German, Japan, and Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
German has adopted compulsory indictment and compulsory-prosecution system, and Japan discretionary indictment and quisi-prosecution system as a control measure of prosecutorial power. The Korean lawmakers of Criminal Procedure Act(CPA) adopted the quisi-prosecution system in 1954, but the scope of its application had been limited to the crimes of public officials by the military government in 1973. Since then it's function as a control instrument over the abuse of prosecutors' power has been turned off. * Professor, School of Law, Chonbuk National University Growing public have requested to extend the scope of its application on all crimes, and the President Committee on Judicial Reform prepared a bill for revision of CPA in 2006. But the revised CPA allowed only the persons who lodge complaints to apply for ruling and changed the quisi-prosecution system with the compulsory prosecution system. The abuse of prosecutorial powers has become more serious social problem in Korea. Many people are demanding to substitute the compulsory-prosecution system with the quisi-prosecution system to control the prosecutorial discretion effectively. This study will analyze the two systems and explore ways toward the moderate system the check the authority of the prosecution in Korea.
Abstract
German has adopted compulsory indictment and compulsory-prosecution system, and Japan discretionary indictment and quisi-prosecution system as a control measure of prosecutorial power. The Korean lawmakers of Criminal Procedure Act(CPA) adopted the quisi-prosecution system in 1954, but the scope of its application had been limited to the crimes of public officials by the military government in 1973. Since then it's function as a control instrument over the abuse of prosecutors' power has been turned off. * Professor, School of Law, Chonbuk National University Growing public have requested to extend the scope of its application on all crimes, and the President Committee on Judicial Reform prepared a bill for revision of CPA in 2006. But the revised CPA allowed only the persons who lodge complaints to apply for ruling and changed the quisi-prosecution system with the compulsory prosecution system. The abuse of prosecutorial powers has become more serious social problem in Korea. Many people are demanding to substitute the compulsory-prosecution system with the quisi-prosecution system to control the prosecutorial discretion effectively. This study will analyze the two systems and explore ways toward the moderate system the check the authority of the prosecution in Korea.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김선수, "상설특별검사 및 특별감찰관 제도도입방안에 관한 의견", 상설특별검사 및 특별감찰관 제도도입방안에 관한 공청회 자료집, ~ (2013)
- 김태명, "재판상 준기소절차의 활성화 방안", 비교형사법연구, 8(1(2)), pp.353~382 (2006), 한국비교형사법학회
- 김태명, "검찰시민위원회 및 기고심사회 제도에 대한 비판적 고찰: 미국의 대배심제도와 일본의 검찰심사회제도를 참고하여", 형사정책연구, 21(4), pp.149~192 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
- 김환수, "Klaus Volk" (2009), 독일형사소송법
- 도중진, "일본의 형사사법-검찰심사회와 배심제도", 형사정책, 13(1) (2001)
- 문준영, "법원과 검찰의 탄생" (2010)
- 신동운, "일본형사수속법" (2003)
- 오정용, "일본의 검찰심사회제도를 통해 본 또 하나의 시민의 사법참여", 형사법연구, 23(3), pp.337~368 (2011), 한국형사법학회
- 윤영철, "권력형비리로 본 검찰개혁의 필요성", 권력형 비리로 본 검찰개혁의 필요성과 대안 토론회, 2011.6.9, ~ (2011)
- 정한중, "시민참여형 공소권통제제도의 모색", 법학연구, 12(1), pp.218~246 (2009), 법학연구소
- 조기영, "재정신청제도의 전망과 과제", 형사법의 신동향, (14) (2008)
- 참여연대, "재정신청사건에서 모순에 빠진 검찰-욕심에 비해 성실하지 않은 검찰이 재정신청제 도를 흔들고 있다", 2009.9.30, ~ (2009)
- 井上正仁, "11. 4. 서울대학교 법 과대학 초청강연문, In もう－つの國民參加-日本の?察審査?制をめぐる動向-", 서울대학교 법과대학 초청강연문, ~ (2010)
- 하태훈, "독일의 기소강제절차, In 한국 형사법학의 이론과 실천(정암 정신진 박사 고희기념 논문집)" (2010)
- 小野淸一郞, "滿洲國刑事訴訟法", 法學協會雜誌, 56(3) (1938)
- 蓧倉滿, "わが國の檢察審査會制度とアメリカ大陪審", ジュリスト, (544) (1973)
- 小田中總樹, "刑事裁判制度の改革", 戰後改革, 4 (1975), 司法改革
- 刑事訴訟法の歷史的分析, "小田中聰樹", ~ (1976)
- 三井誠, "檢察審査會制度の現象と課題", 法曹時報, 50(9) (1978)
- 三井誠, "刑事訴訟法施行30年と檢察官司法, In 別冊 判例タイムズ 刑事訴訟法の理論と實務" (1981)
- 越溢弘, "私人訴追主義と國家訴追主義", 九州大 法政硏究, 48(1) (1981)
- 平野龍一, "現行刑事訴訟法の診斷", 團藤重光敎授華甲記念論文集, 4 (1985)
- 三井誠, "檢察審査會制度の今後", 現代刑事法, (69) (2005)
- 新屋達之, "起訴?制手?の生成と?展(1)-付審判手?の理解の前提として", 法??誌, 34(1) (1987)
- 新屋達之, "起訴?制手?の生成と?展(1)-付審判手?の理解の前提として", 法学雑誌, 34(2) (1987)
- 新屋達之, "西ドイツにおける訴強制手続(1)-その現狀と課題", 法学雑誌, 36(1) (1989)
- 本田兆司, "付審判決定後の公判における問題點と改善策", 自由と正義, 43(7) (1992)
- 鯰越溢弘, "準起訴手續と私人訴追主義", 自由と正義, 43(7) (1992)
- 寺岐嘉博, "檢察審査會の議決への法的拘束力", 現代刑事法, (43) (2001)
- 三井誠, "刑事手續法(Ⅱ)" (2003)
- 三井誠, "檢察審査會制度の今後", 現代刑事法, (69) (2005)
- Ostler, "Das Klageerzwingungsverfahren", pp.1931
- Carsten, "Die Geschichte der Staatsanwaltschaft in Deutschland bis zur Gegenward" (1932)
- Dietz, "Die Klageerzwingung" (1933)
- Wagner, "Zun Legalitatsprinzip, In Festschrift fur den 45", Festschrift fur den, 45 (1964), Deutschen Juristentags
- Gossel, "Uberlegungen des Legalitatprinzips im rechtsstaatlichen Strafverfahren, In Festschrift fur Dunnerbier" (1982)
- Reiß, "Die Stellung des Verletzen im Strafverfahren", Verhandlungen des, 55 (1984), Deutschen Juristentages
- Neumann, "Die Stellung des Opfers im Starafrecht, In Hassemer" (1987), Strafrechtspolitik
- Bischoff, "Klageerzwingungsverfahren" (1987)