무용교육 패러다임 변화요인으로서의 포스트모더니즘
A study on the postmodernism relationship as the factors of changes in the paradigm of dance education
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This research interpreted postmodernism as a new cultural logic comprehensively calling the cultural phenomenon which has shown up with the advent of a socil life and a new-way economic order since the 1960s. As an individual’s point of view changes as he or she goes through the real world, the paradigm of dancing education gets related to society, economy, and the cultural change and speed. A shift toward the information and knowledgebased society has created craving for new social and cultural desire, education has stressed creativity based on the knowledge, not the acquirement of simple knowledge itself, and the art education has focused its paradigm on creativity and experience education as well. This research saw the starting point of a change in the paradigm of dancing education comes from ideologies in the age prior to postmodernism, not from a postmodern society. It is aimed at analyzing what factors played a leading role in changing the paradigm of dancing education by the relationship between arts education and dancing through the characteristics of postmodernism, and exploring the changed goals of dancing education by taking part in postmodern society. The capitalistic ruling ideology had taken control over life, thinking, culture and art, in reaction to which postmodernism came into being. While modernism was frentically in pursuit of high-level specialization in the field of each and every culture, and communicated with one another in their own language, postmodernism criticized such an incommunicable state and began to break down the boundary of life and culture. The special features of postmodernism arts like that have brought about transformation in the way people see and experience the world, and the social and cultural desire has been wary of the authority of knowledge which logical thinking can enjoy. As a result, a not-solid way of thinking as to new values in terms of the newly-appearing paradigm of dancing education has turned itself into the stepping-stone by which the change in paradigm towards creativity and experience education took place. Abstract A study on the postmodernism relationship as the factors of changes in the paradigm of dance education 37 Therefore, dancing education can be included in the knowledge structure intended for an age-conscious education, and the display of sensibility, sensitivity, and creativity has emerged as the diversification of creative ideas which has been seen as individual and insignificant. Dancing, as a form of knowledge and experience, is a kind of method to convey and organize individual perceptions, which came to recognize an individual as a perfect one. So the transformation in one’s view on the plural and cultural knowledge, as a whole-person education, which includes new ideologies and generalize consciousness through participation, can tell us the change and direction of dancing education paradigm which should go on in human beings’ life
Abstract
This research interpreted postmodernism as a new cultural logic comprehensively calling the cultural phenomenon which has shown up with the advent of a socil life and a new-way economic order since the 1960s. As an individual’s point of view changes as he or she goes through the real world, the paradigm of dancing education gets related to society, economy, and the cultural change and speed. A shift toward the information and knowledgebased society has created craving for new social and cultural desire, education has stressed creativity based on the knowledge, not the acquirement of simple knowledge itself, and the art education has focused its paradigm on creativity and experience education as well. This research saw the starting point of a change in the paradigm of dancing education comes from ideologies in the age prior to postmodernism, not from a postmodern society. It is aimed at analyzing what factors played a leading role in changing the paradigm of dancing education by the relationship between arts education and dancing through the characteristics of postmodernism, and exploring the changed goals of dancing education by taking part in postmodern society. The capitalistic ruling ideology had taken control over life, thinking, culture and art, in reaction to which postmodernism came into being. While modernism was frentically in pursuit of high-level specialization in the field of each and every culture, and communicated with one another in their own language, postmodernism criticized such an incommunicable state and began to break down the boundary of life and culture. The special features of postmodernism arts like that have brought about transformation in the way people see and experience the world, and the social and cultural desire has been wary of the authority of knowledge which logical thinking can enjoy. As a result, a not-solid way of thinking as to new values in terms of the newly-appearing paradigm of dancing education has turned itself into the stepping-stone by which the change in paradigm towards creativity and experience education took place. Abstract A study on the postmodernism relationship as the factors of changes in the paradigm of dance education 37 Therefore, dancing education can be included in the knowledge structure intended for an age-conscious education, and the display of sensibility, sensitivity, and creativity has emerged as the diversification of creative ideas which has been seen as individual and insignificant. Dancing, as a form of knowledge and experience, is a kind of method to convey and organize individual perceptions, which came to recognize an individual as a perfect one. So the transformation in one’s view on the plural and cultural knowledge, as a whole-person education, which includes new ideologies and generalize consciousness through participation, can tell us the change and direction of dancing education paradigm which should go on in human beings’ life
참고문헌 (18)
- 고경화, "예수교육의 역사와 이론" (2009), 학지사
- 김욱동, "모더니즘과 포스트모더니즘" (1993), 현암사
- 김화숙, "무용교육론" (2013), 한학문화
- 목영해, "후 현대주의 교육학" (1996), 교육과학사
- 커뮤니티 아트 진흥 방안 연구, "전병태", 한국문화관광연구원, ~ (2007)
- 손은란, "학교 미술교육의 위상강화를 위한 시각문화교육의 패러다임에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2007
- 한명희, "교육의 미학적 탐구" (2003), 집문당
- 한명희, "교육의 철학적 이해" (2010), 문음사
- 한혜리, "무용의 예술적 범 영역성에 관한 연구 - 상호텍스트성(intertextualité)적 접근 -", 한국무용교육학회지, 15(2), pp.129~146 (2004), 한국무용교육학회
- 한혜리, "무용사색" (2011), 한학문화
- 한혜리, "무용 텍스트로서 비평의 교육적 기능 연구", 한국무용교육학회지, 24(1), pp.19~34 (2013), 한국무용교육학회
- Alexander, Victoria, D., "예술사회학" (2010), 살림출판사
- Bourdieu, p., "구별짓기" (1978), 새물결
- Dewey, J., "경험의로서의 예술" (2003), 책세상
- Jung, W., "미메시스에서 시뮬라시옹까지" (2006), 경성대학교출판부
- Kuhn, T., "과학혁명의 구조" (2013), 까치글방
- Hall, S., "문화, 이데올로기, 정체성: 스튜어트 홀 선집" (2015), 컬처룩
- Toynbee, A. J., "역사의 연구" (2007), 동서문화사
