본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Industry Level of Foreign Direct Investment and Militarized Interstate Conflict

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

While many researches measure economic interdependence as trade, we argue that foreign direct investment (FDI) is just as good a proxy for measuring economic interdependence as the level of trade ties. It is because interstate economic relations are characterized just as much by foreign investments as by trade between countries. Similarly to trade, FDI is understood as a means to promote peace. Yet, although research on the relationship of FDI and conflict has been gradually increasing in recent years, studies have not yet focused on examining the effect of foreign direct investment on conflict across industrial sectors. It is the reason why this research is initiated. We expect to examine not only the fact that higher level interdependence – understood as the ratio of inward FDI stock and GDP – makes conflict less likely, but also the fact that there are differences across the primary, secondary and tertiary industrial sectors. More specifically, on the base of the FDI volumes and military strategic considerations, we expect the secondary sector to have the largest negative impact on the likelihood of military interstate disputes. We use the Correlates of War project’s Militarized Interstate Dispute database and we merge it with our own dataset on inward FDI stock inflow. We also control for several factors: trade, economic growth (GDP per capita), relative capabilities, major power status, alliance structure, dyadic democracy, and contiguity. We use a time-series cross-section logit analysis that covers the period between 1970 and 1992. We found that the tertiary sector has a negative impact on conflict initiation. A more apt conclusion is that inward FDI stock has no impact on militarized interstate disputes since no significant relationship could be uncovered between FDI and conflict. This result suggests that we need to extend our research to the more common FDI flow measure.

Abstract

While many researches measure economic interdependence as trade, we argue that foreign direct investment (FDI) is just as good a proxy for measuring economic interdependence as the level of trade ties. It is because interstate economic relations are characterized just as much by foreign investments as by trade between countries. Similarly to trade, FDI is understood as a means to promote peace. Yet, although research on the relationship of FDI and conflict has been gradually increasing in recent years, studies have not yet focused on examining the effect of foreign direct investment on conflict across industrial sectors. It is the reason why this research is initiated. We expect to examine not only the fact that higher level interdependence – understood as the ratio of inward FDI stock and GDP – makes conflict less likely, but also the fact that there are differences across the primary, secondary and tertiary industrial sectors. More specifically, on the base of the FDI volumes and military strategic considerations, we expect the secondary sector to have the largest negative impact on the likelihood of military interstate disputes. We use the Correlates of War project’s Militarized Interstate Dispute database and we merge it with our own dataset on inward FDI stock inflow. We also control for several factors: trade, economic growth (GDP per capita), relative capabilities, major power status, alliance structure, dyadic democracy, and contiguity. We use a time-series cross-section logit analysis that covers the period between 1970 and 1992. We found that the tertiary sector has a negative impact on conflict initiation. A more apt conclusion is that inward FDI stock has no impact on militarized interstate disputes since no significant relationship could be uncovered between FDI and conflict. This result suggests that we need to extend our research to the more common FDI flow measure.

참고문헌 (75)

  1. Ahlquist,John S, "Economic Policy, Institutions, and Capital Flows:Portfolio and Direct Investment Flows in Developing Countries", International Studies Quarterly, 50(3), pp.681~704 (2006)
  2. Alesina, Alberto, "Political Cycles and the Macroeconomy" (1999), The MIT Press
  3. Barbieri,Katherine, "Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Interstate Conflict?", Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), pp.29~49 (1996), 29-49
  4. Beck, Nathaniel, "Taking Time Seriously: Time-series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Independent Variable", American Journal of Political Science, 42(4), pp.1260~1288 (1998)
  5. Bennett, D. Scott, "EUGene: A Conceptual Manual", International Interactions, 26, pp.179~204 (2000)
  6. Bollen, Kenneth A, "Political Instability and Foreign Direct Investment: The Motor Vehicle Industry, 1948-1965", Social Forces, 60(4), pp.1070~1088 (1982)
  7. Bremer,Stuart A, "Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816-1965", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 36(2), pp.309~341 (1991)
  8. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, "War and Survival of Political Leaders: A Comparative Study of Regime Types and Political Accountability", American Political Science Review, 89, pp.841~855 (1995)
  9. Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, "Policy Failure and Political Survival", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 43(2), pp.147~161 (1999)
  10. Buthe, Tim, "The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through Policy Commitment via Trade Agreements and Investment Treaties?", the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association (2004)
  11. Buzan,Barry, "Economic Structure and International Security: The Limits of the Liberal Case", International Organization, 38(4), pp.597~624 (1984)
  12. Cho,Hye Jee, "Political Risk, Labor Standards, and Foreign Direct Investment", the annual meeting of Midwest Political Science Association (2005)
  13. Chiozza, Giacomo, "International Conflict and the Tenure of Leaders: Is War Still Ex Post Inefficient?", American Journal of Political Science, 48, pp.604~619 (2004)
  14. Clark,Colin G, "Conditions of Economic Progress" (1940), Macmillan
  15. Dixon,William J, "Democracy and the Peaceful Settlement of International Conflict", American Political Science Review, 88(1), pp.1~17 (1994)
  16. Dorussen,Han, "Heterogeneous Trade Interests and Conflict. What You Trade Matters", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 50(1), pp.87~101 (2006)
  17. Fearon,James D, "Rationalist Explanations for War", International Organization, 41(1), pp.68~90 (1995)
  18. Ghosn, Faten, "The MID3 Data Set, 1993-2001. Procedures, Coding Rules, and Description", Conflict Management and Peace Research Science, 21, pp.133~154 (2004)
  19. Gilpin,Robert, "Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order" (2001), Princeton University Press
  20. Gleditsch,Kristian S, "Expanded Trade and GDP data", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 46(5), pp.712~724 (2002)
  21. Gartzke, Erik A, "Investing in the Peace: Economic Interdependence and International Conflict", International Organization, 55(2), pp.391~438 (2001)
  22. Gartzke, Erik A, "War, Peace, and the Invisible Hand: Positive Political Externalities of Economic Globalization", International Studies Quarterly, 47, pp.561~586 (2003)
  23. Hiscox,Michael J, "International Trade and Political Conflict: Commerce, Coalitions, and Mobility" (2002), Princeton University Press.
  24. International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, "United Nations, ST", ESA, SER.M, pp.4, Rev.3
  25. Jensen,Nathan M, "Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment", International Organization, 57(3), pp.587~616 (2003)
  26. Kindleberger,Charles P, "The World in Depression, 1929-1933" (1973), Allen Lane
  27. Keohane, Robert R, "Power and Interdependence" (1989), Foresman
  28. Kolstad Ivar, "Social Development and Industry Level Foreign Direct Investment" (2004), Chr. Michelsen Institute
  29. Foreign Direct Investment Financing of Capital Formation in Central and Eastern Europe, "Krkoska,Libor", ~, pp.EBRD Working Paper Nr. 67. (2001)
  30. Krustev,Valentin L, "Interdependence and the Duration of Militarized Conflict", Journal of Peace Research, 43(3), pp.243~260 (2006)
  31. Lee,Hoon, "Foreign Direct Investment and Militarized Interstate Conflict", the annual meeting of the International Studies Association-Midwest (2005)
  32. Li, Quan, "Reversal of Fortunes: Democratic Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment Inflows to Developing Countries", International Organization, 57(1), pp.175~211 (2003)
  33. "Study on Degree of Orderliness of Regional Industrial Structure"[URL]
  34. Liu,Scott X, "Foreign Direct Investment and the Multinational Enterprise: A Reexamination Using Signaling Theory" (1997), Praeger Publishers
  35. Mansfield, Edward D, "The Study of Interdependence and Conflict. Recent Advances, Open Questions, and Directions for Future Research", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45(6), pp.834~859 (2001)
  36. "Polity IV Project: PoliticalRegime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800-2002"[URL]
  37. Modelski,George, "Multinational Corporations and World Order" (1972), Sage
  38. Moosa,Imad A, "Foreign Direct Investment: Theory, Evidence and Practice" (2002), Palgrave
  39. "Montenegro Moody’s Assigns BAA1", BAA2 Ratings to Republic of Montenegro, 2008
  40. Oneal,John R, "The Affinity of Foreign Investors for Authoritarian Regimes", Political Research Quarterly, 47(3), pp.565~588 (1994)
  41. Oneal, John R, "The Classical Liberals Were Right: Democracy, Interdependence, and Conflict, 1950-1985", International Studies Quarterly, 41(2), pp.267~295 (1997)
  42. Oneal,John R, "Assessing the Liberal Peace with Alternative Specifications: Trade Still Reduces Conflict", Journal of Peace Research, 36, pp.423~432 (1999)
  43. Oneal,John R.(1999b).The Kantian Peace:The Pacific Benefits of Democracy,Interdependence,and International Organizations,1885-, "The Kantian Peace: The Pacific Benefits of Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations, 1885-1992", World Politics, 52, pp.1~37 (1992)
  44. Oneal, John, "The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950-1985", Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), pp.11~28 (1996)
  45. Organski, A.F. K, "The War Ledger" (1980), University of Chicago Pres
  46. Orourke,Tony, "Go East, But Make It Fast", The Herald (Glasgow)., pp.7~ (1994)
  47. Quackenbush,Stephen L, "Identifying Opportunity for Conflict: Politically Active Dyads", Conflict Management and Peace Science, 23(1), pp.37~51 (2006)
  48. Quackenbush, Stephen L, "Settlements, Outcomes, and the Recurrence of Conflict", Journal of Peace Research, 45(6) (2008)
  49. Penev, Slavica, "Foreign Direct Investment and the Investment Climate in South-East Europe", Economic Annals, 163, pp.71~92 (2004)
  50. Polachek,Solomon W, "Conflict and Trade", Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(1), pp.55~78 (1980)
  51. Polachek, Solomon W, "Liberalism and Interdependence: Extending the Trade-Conflict Model", Journal of Peace Research, 36(4), pp.405~422 (1999)
  52. Globalization and International Conflict: Can FDI Increase Peace?, "Polachek, Solomon", Can FDI Increase Peace?"Rutgers University Newark Working Paper., ~, pp.Rutgers University Newark Working Paper. (2005)
  53. Rogowski,Ronald, "Commerce and Coalitions: How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments" (1989), Princeton University Press
  54. Rosecrance,Richard, "The Rise of the Virtual State: Wealth and Power in the Coming Century" (1999), Basic Books
  55. Rosecrance,Richard and Peter Thompson, "Trade, Foreign Investment, and Security", Annual Review of Political Science, 67, pp.377~398 (2003)
  56. Russett, Bruce M, "Triangulating Peace:Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations" (2001), W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.
  57. Senese, Paul D, "Sowing the Seeds of Conflict: The Effect of Dispute Settlement on Durations of Peace", Journal of Politics, 65(3), pp.696~717 (2003)
  58. Singer, J. David, "Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820-1965 in Peace, War and Numbers", pp.19~48 (1972), Sage
  59. Souva, Mark, "The Liberal Peace Revisited: The Role of Democracy, Dependence, and Development in Militarized Interstate Dispute Initiation, 1950-2000", International Interactions, 32, pp.183~200 (2006)
  60. Stolper, Wolfgang, "Protection and Real Wages", The Review of Economic Studies, 9(1), pp.58~73 (1941)
  61. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. I: Asia and the Pacific" (1992), United Nations Publication.
  62. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. II: Central and Eastern Europe" (1992), United Nations Publication.
  63. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. III: Developed Countries" (1992), United Nations Publication
  64. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. IV: Latin America and the Caribbean" (1994), United Nations Publication
  65. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. V: Africa" (1996), United Nations Publication
  66. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. VI: West Asia" (1996), United Nations Publication
  67. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. Vol. VII (Parts I and II): Asia and the Pacific" (2000), United Nations Publication
  68. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. 2003. Vol. VIII: Central and Eastern Europe" (2003), United Nations Publication
  69. UNCTAD, "World Investment Directory. 2004. Vol. IX: Latin America and the Caribbean" (2004), United Nations Publication.
  70. United Nations, "World Investment Report" (1996), United Nations Publication
  71. United Nations, "World Investment Report" (2004), United Nations Publication
  72. The World Bank, "Globalization, Growth, and Poverty" (2002), Oxford University Press
  73. The World Bank, "World Development Indicators, CD-ROM", IBRD, World Bank, ~ (2006)
  74. Waltz,Kenneth N, "The Myth of National Dependence" (1970), MIT Press
  75. Waltz,Kenneth N, "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Addison-Wesley Publ. Co.

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)