본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

‘創’과 ‘創’의 ‘傷’義와 ‘始’義를 바탕으로 한 그 同源字에 대한 訓詁

The Interpretation of such root letters based on the meaning of the wound and beginning of creation ‘創’

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

The original shape of ‘創’ is ‘刅’. The original meaning is ‘wounded’ or ‘wounded and damaged’. This letter can be seen as 指事字(zhishizi) or 會意字(huiyizi). This shape became the ‘創’ according to the sound of the 倉 and the meaning of the 刀. The original shape of ‘to start’ or ‘to make’ is ‘刱’. However, the usage of the meaning of ‘刱’ shaped ‘to make’ or ‘to start’ does not appear much in the literature. The meaning of ‘make’ and ‘create’ in Chinese traditional philosophy was not much attention and was not given significant significance in the Confucian books. The meaning of ‘刱’ gradually became blurred and integrated into a ‘創’ with the same pronunciation. By now, the rate of use of ‘創(Creation)’ in the meaning of ‘Creation’ has increased, and it has become much more than the ‘Creation’ of ‘Wound’ as a used vocabulary. This can be regarded as having a certain degree of relationship with the change of thinking and philosophy. ‘Creation’ has the meaning of ‘scratch’, ‘start’ and ‘make’ according to the flow of the time, and the meaning of the same characters has also been influenced. The meaning of the synonym of ‘Creation’ can also be largely divided into the letters related to ‘wound’ and the synonyms related to the meaning of ‘start’ or ‘make’. By exploring the meaning of ‘Creation’ from multiple angles and inspecting the meaning in depth. In the first place, it is possible to make students understand the meaning of the two aspects of ‘wound’, ‘start’ and ‘make’ of ‘wound’ so that there is no confusion in the meaning analysis of the letters. Next, it will be a great help to decipher the document, and not only the reading of the document, but also the meaning of the ‘origin’ It is expected that it will illuminate in various directions so that the meanings of each of the synonyms can be further deepened. Therefore, I think that we can explore the deeper cultural philosophical meaning.

Abstract

The original shape of ‘創’ is ‘刅’. The original meaning is ‘wounded’ or ‘wounded and damaged’. This letter can be seen as 指事字(zhishizi) or 會意字(huiyizi). This shape became the ‘創’ according to the sound of the 倉 and the meaning of the 刀. The original shape of ‘to start’ or ‘to make’ is ‘刱’. However, the usage of the meaning of ‘刱’ shaped ‘to make’ or ‘to start’ does not appear much in the literature. The meaning of ‘make’ and ‘create’ in Chinese traditional philosophy was not much attention and was not given significant significance in the Confucian books. The meaning of ‘刱’ gradually became blurred and integrated into a ‘創’ with the same pronunciation. By now, the rate of use of ‘創(Creation)’ in the meaning of ‘Creation’ has increased, and it has become much more than the ‘Creation’ of ‘Wound’ as a used vocabulary. This can be regarded as having a certain degree of relationship with the change of thinking and philosophy. ‘Creation’ has the meaning of ‘scratch’, ‘start’ and ‘make’ according to the flow of the time, and the meaning of the same characters has also been influenced. The meaning of the synonym of ‘Creation’ can also be largely divided into the letters related to ‘wound’ and the synonyms related to the meaning of ‘start’ or ‘make’. By exploring the meaning of ‘Creation’ from multiple angles and inspecting the meaning in depth. In the first place, it is possible to make students understand the meaning of the two aspects of ‘wound’, ‘start’ and ‘make’ of ‘wound’ so that there is no confusion in the meaning analysis of the letters. Next, it will be a great help to decipher the document, and not only the reading of the document, but also the meaning of the ‘origin’ It is expected that it will illuminate in various directions so that the meanings of each of the synonyms can be further deepened. Therefore, I think that we can explore the deeper cultural philosophical meaning.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. 董性茂, "形聲字借用聲符表意例證", 莆田學院學報, 14(4), pp.29~32 (2007)
  2. 郭錫良, "漢字古音手冊" (1986), 北京大學出版社
  3. 李圃, "古文字詁林" (2004), 上海教育出版社
  4. 林達青, "動作類反訓詞的意象模式", 淮南師範學院學報, (1), pp.79~82 (2001)
  5. 劉鈞傑, "同源字典補" (1999), 商務印書館
  6. 劉鈞傑, "同源字典再補" (1999), 語文出版社
  7. 馬進勇, "“反訓”稱名考辨", 語文學刊, (12), pp.19~20 (2014)
  8. 唐作藩, "音韻學敎程" (1997), 北京大學出版社
  9. 萬獻初, "同源假借與詞義“反訓”", 鹹寧師專學報, (1), pp.26~30 (1987)
  10. 王寧, "訓詁學原理" (1996), 中國國際廣播出版社
  11. 王寧, "古代漢語" (2002), 北京出版社
  12. 王力, "同源字典" (1997), 商務印書館
  13. 徐世榮, "古漢語反訓集釋" (1985), 安徽教育出版社
  14. 李珍華, "漢字古今音表" (1999), 中華書局出版
  15. 兪建梁, "對原型範疇理論的質疑", 廣東外語外貿大學學報, 18(4), pp.48~52 (2007)
  16. 張蕾, "『爾雅』訓詁方法分析", 古典文學, pp.33~34 (2015), 西北師範大學
  17. "新華字典(Xinhuazidian)" (2017)[URL]
  18. "漢典(Handian)" (2017)[URL]
  19. "康熙字典(Kangxizidian)" (2017)[URL]
  20. "經典(Jingdian)" (2017)[URL]
  21. "中央硏究院 漢籍電子文獻(Hanjidianziwenxian)" (2017)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)