Directions for the Korean Social INTEGRATION Policy Index Development
1
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: As South Korea enters a multicultural society, the importance of a reasonable and effective social integration policy system has been emphasized. The evaluation of social integration policies can promote policy improvement and improve policy effects. The purpose of this study is to analyze the limitations of the application of MIPEX in the evaluation of the Korean social integration policy and to give suggestions about the developing direction of South Korea's social integration policy index. Method: This study starts with the MIPEX’s analysis of South Korea to understands the advantages and dis-advantages of Korean immigrant social integration policy. On the other hand, there are certain limits in MIPEX’s evaluation and practical application in South Korea, so by observation and analysis of MIPEX and comparison of integration policies of South Korea and other countries, suggestions are made for the development of a social integration policy index that meets the conditions of South Korea. Results: Although South Korea’s immigrant social integration policy is in a leading position in Asia especially in multicultural education area but compared to the Top countries in MIPEX, some improvement still need to be made. It was showing a trend of regression with increased difficulty in obtaining permanent residency. MIPEX's completely Europe-centered evaluation standards, ignoring illegal immigrants and only focusing on legal immi-grants, and ignoring the actual implementation of policies are all reasons for its limitations of application in South Korea. Conclusion: It is necessary to consider the conditions of South Korea and formulate policy indicators that conform to the society during the development of the Korean social integration policy index. The targets of the social integration policy should include all immigrants, and the actual implementation of the policy should be reflected in the evaluation. According to the specific conditions of the country, citizen participation, gender equality, and social security are policy elements that can be added to the index.
Abstract
Purpose: As South Korea enters a multicultural society, the importance of a reasonable and effective social integration policy system has been emphasized. The evaluation of social integration policies can promote policy improvement and improve policy effects. The purpose of this study is to analyze the limitations of the application of MIPEX in the evaluation of the Korean social integration policy and to give suggestions about the developing direction of South Korea's social integration policy index. Method: This study starts with the MIPEX’s analysis of South Korea to understands the advantages and dis-advantages of Korean immigrant social integration policy. On the other hand, there are certain limits in MIPEX’s evaluation and practical application in South Korea, so by observation and analysis of MIPEX and comparison of integration policies of South Korea and other countries, suggestions are made for the development of a social integration policy index that meets the conditions of South Korea. Results: Although South Korea’s immigrant social integration policy is in a leading position in Asia especially in multicultural education area but compared to the Top countries in MIPEX, some improvement still need to be made. It was showing a trend of regression with increased difficulty in obtaining permanent residency. MIPEX's completely Europe-centered evaluation standards, ignoring illegal immigrants and only focusing on legal immi-grants, and ignoring the actual implementation of policies are all reasons for its limitations of application in South Korea. Conclusion: It is necessary to consider the conditions of South Korea and formulate policy indicators that conform to the society during the development of the Korean social integration policy index. The targets of the social integration policy should include all immigrants, and the actual implementation of the policy should be reflected in the evaluation. According to the specific conditions of the country, citizen participation, gender equality, and social security are policy elements that can be added to the index.
참고문헌 (32)
- 이재범, "Suggestions for Using AI in Preparation for a Super-Aging Society", Robotics & AI Ethics, 5(2), pp.57~64 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 이상림, "저출산 고령화에 따른 노동력 부족 전망과 정책적 함의", 한국인구학, 35(2), pp.1~28 (2012), 한국인구학회
- 설동훈, "한국의 인구고령화와 이민정책", 경제와 사회, (106), pp.73~114 (2015), 비판사회학회[DOI]
- International Migration in Europe, "Bijl RV", Amsterdam University, ~ (2008)
- Kurthen H, "Immigrant Integration: Comparative Evidence from the United States and Germany", Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1), pp.139~170 (2009)
- Givens TE, "Immigrant Integration in Europe: Empirical Research", Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), pp.67~83 (2007)
- Immigrant Integration as a Two-way Process: Translating Theory into Practice, "Hellgren Z", GRITim, 1~30, pp.GRITim Working Paper, 23 (2015)
- Wanner P, "Migration et Integration" (2004), Office Federal de la Statistiqu
- Koopmans R, "Contested Citizenship: Immigration and Cultural Diversity in Europe" (2005)
- Molodikova IN, "Contacts with Diasporas and Diaspora Organisations as a Key to a Successful Migrant Integration Policy in the EU", Baltic Region, 10(3), pp.58~79 (2018)
- Gray B, "Migrant Integration Policy: A Nationalist Fantasy of Management and Control. Translocations: The Irish Migration", Race and Social Transformation Review, 13(1), pp.121~141 (2006)
- Keizo Y, "The Challenges for Japanese Immigrant Integration Policy", Around the Globe, 4(2), pp.41~44 (2008)
- Kondo A, "Migrant Integration Policy in Japan", Meijo Law Review, 61(1), pp.3~30 (2011)
- 임형백, "한국과 서구의 다문화 사회의 차이와 정책 비교", 다문화사회연구, 2(1), pp.161~185 (2009), 아시아여성연구원[DOI]
- Shen S, "The Bibimbap Migration Theory? Challenges of Korea’s Multicultural Mix and Social Integration Development", Journal of International Migration and Integration, 18(3), pp.771~789 (2017)
- 이성순, "이민자 사회통합정책의 현황과 과제: 사회통합프로그램을 중심으로", 사회과학연구, 21(4), pp.165~187 (2010), 사회과학연구소
- 장안리, "Civic and Political Engagement of Korean Chinese (Joseonjok) in Korea:Case of Activists", Korea Observer, 48(2), pp.325~359 (2017), 한국학술연구원
- Putnam RD, "Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital" (2000), Palgrave Macmillan
- Rossteutscher S, "Social Capital and Civic Engagement: A Comparative Perspective" (2008), Oxford University
- Putnam RD, "Tuning in, Tuning out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America", Political Science & Politics, 28(4), pp.664~683 (1995)
- Aleksynska M, "Civic Participation of Immigrants in Europe: Assimilation, Origin, and Destination Country Effects", European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), pp.566~585 (2011)
- Brinton M, "Women’s Working Lives in East Asia" (2001), Stanford University
- Kwon Hwa-suk, "Research on Difficulties of Female Marriage IMMIGRANTS in KOREAN Societies and Relevant Countermeasures", Regulations, 3(2), pp.1~5 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
- Sabates-Wheeler R, "Social Protection for Migrants: The Challenges of Delivery in the Context of Changing Migration Flows", International Social Security Review, 63(3-4), pp.115~144 (2010)
- Seol DH, "The Citizenship of Foreign Workers in South Korea", Citizenship Studies, 16(1), pp.119~133 (2012)