Analysis of Green Area Ratio by Industrial Complex Type to Minimize DEFORESTATION
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: As the economy grows, many forests, fields, and agricultural land have been converted into industrial complexes. Accordingly, there are deep concerns about damage to the natural ecosystem and environmental im-pact. This study analyzed the factors related to the natural environment by type for industrial complexes promot-ed in forest areas. The authors hope to balance development and conservation by identifying the relationship between factors related to the natural environment. In addition, this study tried to derive rational ways to develop industrial complexes suitable for low-carbon green growth. Method: This study was analyzed based on 95 environmental impact assessments that business operators ap-plied for consultation with agencies concerned to build industrial complexes in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, Korea, for 16 years from 2005 to 2020. The researchers conducted a one-way ANOVA analysis to determine the difference in green area ratio, forest field ratio, tree transplantation ratio, and ecological area ratio by industrial complex type . Post-hoc analysis was performed by the Scheffe test. This paper used the Spss Statistics 21 statistics program to conduct the above statistical analysis. Results: The number of consultations for industrial complexes was highest for general industrial complexes. The green area ratio was 5.60% higher in national industrial complexes than in agricultural and industrial com-plexes. The forest field ratio was 71.84% in quasi-industrial complexes, 40.14% higher than 31.70% in quasi-agro-industrial complexes. The tree transplantation ratio was low in national industrial complexes and quasi-industrial complexes. The ecological area ratio decreased by 72.93% after development compared to before development in general industrial complexes and decreased by 65.75% after development compared to before development in national industrial complexes. Conclusion: Before the industrial complex development, the forest field ratio showed differences by type. How-ever, there was no difference in the ecological area ratio after the development of the industrial complex. This result was seen as the minimum standard set by law in parks and green areas. Therefore, it is necessary to develop eco-friendly industrial complexes rather than reckless development to minimize forest damage. The authors be-lieve it is necessary to respond to climate change and contribute to low-carbon green growth by minimizing the forest area within the development area and increasing the ecological area ratio and tree transplantation ratio after development.
Abstract
Purpose: As the economy grows, many forests, fields, and agricultural land have been converted into industrial complexes. Accordingly, there are deep concerns about damage to the natural ecosystem and environmental im-pact. This study analyzed the factors related to the natural environment by type for industrial complexes promot-ed in forest areas. The authors hope to balance development and conservation by identifying the relationship between factors related to the natural environment. In addition, this study tried to derive rational ways to develop industrial complexes suitable for low-carbon green growth. Method: This study was analyzed based on 95 environmental impact assessments that business operators ap-plied for consultation with agencies concerned to build industrial complexes in Daegu and Gyeongbuk, Korea, for 16 years from 2005 to 2020. The researchers conducted a one-way ANOVA analysis to determine the difference in green area ratio, forest field ratio, tree transplantation ratio, and ecological area ratio by industrial complex type . Post-hoc analysis was performed by the Scheffe test. This paper used the Spss Statistics 21 statistics program to conduct the above statistical analysis. Results: The number of consultations for industrial complexes was highest for general industrial complexes. The green area ratio was 5.60% higher in national industrial complexes than in agricultural and industrial com-plexes. The forest field ratio was 71.84% in quasi-industrial complexes, 40.14% higher than 31.70% in quasi-agro-industrial complexes. The tree transplantation ratio was low in national industrial complexes and quasi-industrial complexes. The ecological area ratio decreased by 72.93% after development compared to before development in general industrial complexes and decreased by 65.75% after development compared to before development in national industrial complexes. Conclusion: Before the industrial complex development, the forest field ratio showed differences by type. How-ever, there was no difference in the ecological area ratio after the development of the industrial complex. This result was seen as the minimum standard set by law in parks and green areas. Therefore, it is necessary to develop eco-friendly industrial complexes rather than reckless development to minimize forest damage. The authors be-lieve it is necessary to respond to climate change and contribute to low-carbon green growth by minimizing the forest area within the development area and increasing the ecological area ratio and tree transplantation ratio after development.
참고문헌 (23)
- 박재찬, "산업단지 개발사업 후보지 선정 프로세스에 관한 연구 : 위계적 평가 모형을 중심으로", 지역산업연구, 38(3), pp.169~188 (2015), 산업경영연구소
- Lee HJ, "Development of Soil Bioengineering Technique for Nat-ural Recovering of Artificial Earthworks(II) - Germination and Growth of Seven Pioneer Plant Species", Journal of the Korea Society of Forest Engineering and Technology, 4(3), pp.208~215 (2006)
- 김오석, "산업단지 개발로 인한 산림훼손 시·공간 경향 분석: 경상북도와 경상남도 사례를 중심으로", 한국도시지리학회지, 19(3), pp.103~111 (2016), 한국도시지리학회[DOI]
- 유재심, "산지개발의 공간분포와 산림훼손", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 19(6), pp.101~109 (2016), 한국환경복원기술학회
- Lee Hyang-ju, "HUMAN & DISASTER: A Study of Prediction on the Species Number and Naturalization Index of Land Naturalized Plants", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 5(1), pp.10~23 (2020), J-INSTITUTE[DOI]
- 김정택, "산림생물다양성의 경제적 가치 평가", 농업생명과학연구, 46(4), pp.31~39 (2012), 농업생명과학연구원[DOI]
- 김성옥, "사전환경검토 대상 택지개발사업의 녹지율분석에 관한 연구", 환경영향평가, 16(5), pp.311~318 (2007), 한국환경영향평가학회
- 한봉호, "택지개발지역의 입지유형에 따른 공원녹지확보 적용지표 개발", 한국조경학회지, 40(1), pp.34~42 (2012), 한국조경학회
- Changjun Kim, "A Study on the CHANGE in Plants of the Wind Power Complex in Mt. Hyeonjong", Protection Convergence, 5(2), pp.1~13 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 김승현, "도시생태계 건전성 증진을 위한 녹지총량 평가법 개발과 적용", Ecology and Resilient Infrastructure, 2(4), pp.311~316 (2015), 응용생태공학회
- 장대희, "외부공간 환경계획지표 사례분석을 통한생태면적률 공간유형 보완 방향 도출 연구- 식재부문 공간유형 신설을 통한 보완방향을 중심으로 -", KIEAE Journal, 12(1), pp.3~10 (2012), 한국생태환경건축학회
- 장대희, "공동주택의 외부공간 시공 후 평가를 통한 생태면적률 개선 방안도출을 위한 기초 연구 - 현장시공시 생태면적률 공간유형 반영을 중심으로 -", KIEAE Journal, 10(6), pp.91~96 (2010), 한국생태환경건축학회
- Jeon Mi-ja, "An Investigation on Developing the Shelter and Safety Facilities of FOREST KINDERGARTENS", Protection Convergence, 5(1), pp.42~53 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 이상돈, "환경영향평가서에 나타난 개발사업의 생태면적률 검토 연구", 환경영향평가, 27(4), pp.394~401 (2018), 한국환경영향평가학회
- 김복영, "공동주택단지의 생태면적률 계획을 위한 LIM 활용방법- 지형 및 포장재 모델링을 중심으로 -", 한국조경학회지, 46(3), pp.14~26 (2018), 한국조경학회[DOI]
- 손동필, "정비사업구역내 생태면적률 도입을 위한 기초연구 - 비용 효과 분석을 중심으로 -", 국토계획, 50(3), pp.109~122 (2015), 대한국토·도시계획학회
- Kwon Gi-seok, "A Study on the Actual Condition and Improvement Plan of Hierachical SAFETY Management in Natural Parks", International Journal of Crisis & Safety, 5(1), pp.21~34 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- 이수동, "토취장 개발에 따른 훼손생태계 이식방안 연구", 한국환경생태학회지, 26(3), pp.394~405 (2012), 한국환경생태학회[DOI]
- Jeongdeok Hong, "An Investigation on the Differences of Management in LANDSCAPE Construction Projects", Public Value, 5(2), pp.32~38 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
- Jangwoo Lee, "A Study on the Revitalization of Forest Management by Improving the Implementation Rate of FOREST Projects", International Journal of Human & Disaster, 5(2), pp.1~9 (2020), J-INSTITUTE[DOI]
- 최준규, "환경영향평가 문제의 원인 및 연계성 분석을 통한 제도개선 연구", 환경영향평가, 17(1), pp.11~24 (2008), 한국환경영향평가학회
- Kim CJ, "Study about Development of Environmental Assessment Guideline for Minimizing of Deforestation(on Industrial Complex)", Doctoral, pp.2016
