본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재후보

The Impacts of OLYMPIC LEGACY on Urban Regeneration: A Systematic Review

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: The Olympic legacy is an important legacy left to the host city by the Olympic Games. It presents the value of Olympic Games and push Olympic movement spread till now. The IOC has stressed the importance and necessity of Olympic legacy in official. The impacts of Olympic legacy promote the regeneration and renewal of the host city and it explores how does the sporting legacy and urban legacy of Olympic legacy impact in the urban renewal and regeneration. It not only improves the sustainable development of city, but also promotes the cultural values of the Olympics. Method: This paper employs the systematic literature reviews to explore the relationship between legacy of Olympic Games and urban regeneration. After the initial search, 427 articles in English language from 2000 to 2020 were returned and it narrowed down to 19 articles finally. The information extracted from the remaining article were used to present how did sporting legacy and urban legacy impact urban regeneration and on which aspects did they impact. Results: The urban legacy and sporting legacy in urban renewal and regeneration process has played a very important role. The sporting legacy can improve the urban space planning via sport architecture and infrastructure built or renovated for the Olympics to adjust urban renewal and regeneration. It also can produce certain impact on an urban infrastructure, such as promoting the improvement of the community, improve the transportation environment and city pollution and other problems to promote the urban organic operation. The impacts of urban legacy are better reflected in the planning stage of the Olympic Games, integrating the problems left during urban development into the planning, and providing a direction for the renewal and regeneration of the city. Conclusion and discussion: First of all, the Olympic Games should be held in accordance with the evaluation of overall situation of the city itself. Rational thinking of the existing problems in city operation process should be conducted and the urban next stage of development prospects should be made at the same time. These two points should be considered as the focus of the Olympic Bid and planning. Then, improving the image of the city can be main task in the short term impact of Olympic Games as urban updating and regeneration. Finally, how to transform short-term temporary impact into long-term permanent impact will be a central issue in Olympic planning.

Abstract

Purpose: The Olympic legacy is an important legacy left to the host city by the Olympic Games. It presents the value of Olympic Games and push Olympic movement spread till now. The IOC has stressed the importance and necessity of Olympic legacy in official. The impacts of Olympic legacy promote the regeneration and renewal of the host city and it explores how does the sporting legacy and urban legacy of Olympic legacy impact in the urban renewal and regeneration. It not only improves the sustainable development of city, but also promotes the cultural values of the Olympics. Method: This paper employs the systematic literature reviews to explore the relationship between legacy of Olympic Games and urban regeneration. After the initial search, 427 articles in English language from 2000 to 2020 were returned and it narrowed down to 19 articles finally. The information extracted from the remaining article were used to present how did sporting legacy and urban legacy impact urban regeneration and on which aspects did they impact. Results: The urban legacy and sporting legacy in urban renewal and regeneration process has played a very important role. The sporting legacy can improve the urban space planning via sport architecture and infrastructure built or renovated for the Olympics to adjust urban renewal and regeneration. It also can produce certain impact on an urban infrastructure, such as promoting the improvement of the community, improve the transportation environment and city pollution and other problems to promote the urban organic operation. The impacts of urban legacy are better reflected in the planning stage of the Olympic Games, integrating the problems left during urban development into the planning, and providing a direction for the renewal and regeneration of the city. Conclusion and discussion: First of all, the Olympic Games should be held in accordance with the evaluation of overall situation of the city itself. Rational thinking of the existing problems in city operation process should be conducted and the urban next stage of development prospects should be made at the same time. These two points should be considered as the focus of the Olympic Bid and planning. Then, improving the image of the city can be main task in the short term impact of Olympic Games as urban updating and regeneration. Finally, how to transform short-term temporary impact into long-term permanent impact will be a central issue in Olympic planning.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Choi Seong-kon, "The Process of KARATE’s Adoption as Formal Game for the TOKYO Olympic Games and Its Prospects", Kinesiology, 3(2), pp.10~15 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  2. Choi Seong-kon, "Analysis of and Suggestions for the Formal Adoption Process of MARTIAL ARTS for the Olympic Games", International Journal of Martial Arts, 4(1), pp.18~28 (2019), J-INSTITUTE
  3. Xu YJ, "Connotation Evolution, Rational Cognition and Realistic Significance of Olympic Legacy", Journal of Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, 31(3), pp.201~205 (2019)
  4. Yan J, "Origin, Upsurge and Evolution of Olympic Legacy", Journal of Beijing Sport Uni-versity, 39(12), pp.14~19 (2016)
  5. Minnaert L, "An Olympic Legacy for All? The Non-infrastructural Outcomes of the Olympic Games for Socially Excluded Groups(Atlanta 1996 - Beijing 2008)", Tourism Management, 33(2), pp.361~370 (2012)
  6. Boukas N, "Olympic Legacy and Cultural Tourism : Exploring the Factors of Athens’ Olympic Heritage", International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(2), pp.203~228 (2013)
  7. Gordziejko T, "The London 2012 Olympic Legacy and the Wonder Factor : Implications for Culture and the Intrinsic Versus Instrumental", Journal of Policy Research in Tourism, Leisure & Events, 6(1), pp.80~84 (2014)
  8. Sport and Exercise Science and Medicine: Building on the Olympic Legacy to Improve the Nation’s Health, "The House of Lords", The Stationery Office Limited, ~ (2012)
  9. Du W, "Value Connotation of Beijing Olympic Games in Heritance and Its Developing and Using", Journal of Shenyang Sport University, 28(2), pp.29~31 (2009)
  10. Xu ZQ, "on the Realization of the Urban Heritage Vision of Bei-jing Winter Olympics under the "Sustainability Strategy Framework"", Journal of Chengdu Sport University, 46(4), pp.89~94 (2020)
  11. Shin Hong-bum, "Developing SPORT LEGACY through Post-Use of Mega-Sport Event Facilities: The Case of Winter Sport", Public Value, 5(1), pp.17~28 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  12. Kim Hak-bum, "A Study on CRIME Prevention and Policing in KOREA’s Urban Regeneration", Regulations, 3(2), pp.6~12 (2018), J-INSTITUTE
  13. Bai Xuefeng, "Analysis on the Risks Ensued during the 2022 Beijing Olympic Winter Games to Protect the Social SECURITY", Protection Convergence, 5(1), pp.32~41 (2020), J-INSTITUTE
  14. Deng HS, "Beijing 2022 between Urban Renovation and Olympic Sporting Legacy: The Case of Shougang", Movement & Sport Sciences, 107, pp.53~65 (2020)
  15. Deng Y, "Planning Mega-event Built Legacies: A Case of Expo 2010 Bei-jing", Habitat International, 53, pp.163~177 (2015)
  16. Davis J, "Futurescapes of Urban Regeneration: Ten Years of Design for the Unfolding Urban Leg-acy of London’s Olympic Games, 2008-2018", Planning Perspectives, 34(5), pp.877~901 (2019)
  17. Roult R, "Planning and Reconversion of Olympic Heritages: The Montreal Olympic Stadium", The International Journal of the History of Sport, 27(16-18), pp.2731~2747 (2010)
  18. Davies L, "Beyond the Olympics : Regeneration Legacies and London 2012", Leisure Studies, 31(3), pp.309~337 (2012)
  19. Essex S, "Mega-sporting Events in Urban and Regional Policy: A History of the Winter Olympics", Planning Perspectives, 19(2), pp.201~204 (2004)
  20. Sanchez RLO, "The Challenge of Urban Design in Securing Post-event Legacies of Olympic Parks", Journal of Urban Design, 23(2), pp.278~297 (2017)
  21. Ferrari S, "Mega-events and their Legacy: Image and Tourism in Genoa, Turin and Milan", Leisure Studies, 36(1), pp.119~137 (2017)
  22. Kassens-Noor E, "Olympic Technologies: Tokyo 2020 and beyond: The Urban Technology Metropoli", Journal of Urban Technology, 25(3), pp.83~104 (2018)
  23. Hiller HH, "Post-event Outcomes and the Post-modern Turn: The Olympics and Urban Transformations", European Sport Management Quarterly, 6(4), pp.317~332 (2007)
  24. Bredikhina N, "Olympic Dreams or Broken Promises: Evaluation of the XXII Olympic Winter Games’ Vision and Impact on Infrastructure, Environment, Athletic Venues, and Tourism", The International Journal of Sport and Society, 10(3), pp.1~16 (2019)
  25. Preuss H, "The Conceptualization and Measurement of Mega Sport Event Legacies", Journal of Sport & Tourism, 12(3-4), pp.207~228 (2007)
  26. Ferreri M, "Learning from Temporary Use and the Making of On-demand Communities in London’s Olympic “Fringes”", Urban Geography, 41(3), pp.409~427 (2020)
  27. Vijay A, "After the Pop-up Games: London’s Never-ending Regeneration", Environment and Planning D : Society and Space, 33, pp.425~443 (2015)
  28. Strohmayer U, "Non-events and their Legacies: Parisian Heritage and the Olympics that Never were", International Journal of Heritage Studies, 19(2), pp.186~202 (2013)
  29. Jones ZM, "Mega-events and the Preservation of Urban Heritage : Literature Gaps, Potential Overlaps, and a Call for Further Research", Journal of Planning Literature, 33(4), pp.433~450 (2018)
  30. Yamawaki Y, "Olympics and Urban Legacy in Sydney : Urban Transformations and Real Estate a Decade after the Olympics", Journal of Urban Design, 19(4), pp.511~540 (2014)
  31. Kassens-Noor E, "Transport Legacy of the Olympic Games, 1992-2012", Journal of Urban Af-fairs, 35(4), pp.393~416 (2013)
  32. Pereira RHM, "Transport Legacy of Mega-events and the Redistribution of Accessibility to Urban Destinations", Cities, 81, pp.45~60 (2018)
  33. Simón JA, "Planning Olympic Legacies : Transport Dreams and Urban Realities", Sport in Soci-ety : Cultures, Commerce, Media, Politics, 17(6), pp.848~850 (2014)
  34. Becca L, "Olympic Games Legacy: From General Benefits to Sustainable Long-term Legacy", The International Journal of the History of Sport, 29(6), pp.924~943 (2012)
  35. Simona A, "Challenges and Key Factors in Planning Legacies of Mega Sporting Events : Les-sons Learned from London, Sochi, and Rio de Janeiro", International Journal of Architectural Re-search, 14(2), pp.203~218 (2019)
  36. Gabbriel A, "Stadium Architecture and Urban Development from the Per-spective of Urban Economics", International Journal of Urban & Regional Research, 34(3), pp.629~646 (2010)
  37. Lynn M, "An Olympic Legacy for All? The Non-infrastructural Outcomes of the Olympic Games for Socially Excluded Groups(Atlanta 1996-Beijing 2008)", Tourism Management, 33(2), pp.361~370 (2010)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)