Multicenter comparison of non-operative techniques of intussusception reduction: saline versus air versus barium
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Intussusception is a common pediatric surgical emergency and non-operative reduction is its first line of management. We aimed to compare 3 contemporary techniques of intussusception reduction. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 3 tertiary care centers in India from January 2017 through December 2019. In the 3 centers, the primary reduction techniques were ultrasound-guided saline reduction (USR), fluoroscopy-guided pneumatic reduction (FPR), and fluoroscopy-guided barium reduction (FBR), respectively. As per these techniques used, we compared clinical characteristics, such as the successful reduction. Results: A total of 255 patients underwent one of the 3 reduction techniques in the study period. Reduction was successful in 90.3%, 85.1%, and 87.7% in the USR, FPR, and FBR groups, respectively (P = 0.961). Mean time to reduction was shorter in the FPR group (30.8 ± 8.9 seconds), compared with the USR (575.0 ± 242.3 seconds) and FBR groups (495.0 ± 118.4 seconds; P < 0.001). Recurrence rates were 11.8%, 20.3%, and 15.8% in the USR, FPR, and FBR groups, respectively (P = 0.522). No association was found between the patients’ age or symptom duration and the successful reduction. One patient in the USR group, 3 in the FPR group, and 4 in the FBR group reported second recurrences. Perforation occurred in 1 patient in the FPR group while no complications occurred in the other groups. There was no in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: All 3 techniques are equally effective, with FPR requiring a shorter time than the other 2 techniques. The reduction technique should be chosen based on the strengths and weaknesses of each technique, as well as local availability.
Abstract
Purpose: Intussusception is a common pediatric surgical emergency and non-operative reduction is its first line of management. We aimed to compare 3 contemporary techniques of intussusception reduction. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 3 tertiary care centers in India from January 2017 through December 2019. In the 3 centers, the primary reduction techniques were ultrasound-guided saline reduction (USR), fluoroscopy-guided pneumatic reduction (FPR), and fluoroscopy-guided barium reduction (FBR), respectively. As per these techniques used, we compared clinical characteristics, such as the successful reduction. Results: A total of 255 patients underwent one of the 3 reduction techniques in the study period. Reduction was successful in 90.3%, 85.1%, and 87.7% in the USR, FPR, and FBR groups, respectively (P = 0.961). Mean time to reduction was shorter in the FPR group (30.8 ± 8.9 seconds), compared with the USR (575.0 ± 242.3 seconds) and FBR groups (495.0 ± 118.4 seconds; P < 0.001). Recurrence rates were 11.8%, 20.3%, and 15.8% in the USR, FPR, and FBR groups, respectively (P = 0.522). No association was found between the patients’ age or symptom duration and the successful reduction. One patient in the USR group, 3 in the FPR group, and 4 in the FBR group reported second recurrences. Perforation occurred in 1 patient in the FPR group while no complications occurred in the other groups. There was no in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: All 3 techniques are equally effective, with FPR requiring a shorter time than the other 2 techniques. The reduction technique should be chosen based on the strengths and weaknesses of each technique, as well as local availability.
참고문헌 (18)
- Ali A, "Pneumatic versus hydrostatic reduction in the treatment of intussusception in children", Ann Pediatr Surg, 13, pp.199~202 (2017)
- Acute intussusception in infants and children: incidence, clinical presentation and management: a global perspective, "Bines JE", World Health Organization, ~ (2002)
- Sadigh G, "Meta-analysis of air versus liquid enema for intussusception reduction in children", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 205, pp.W542~W549 (2015)
- Meyer JS, "Air and liquid contrast agents in the management of intussusception : a controlled, randomized trial", Radiology, 188, pp.507~511 (1993)
- Khorana J, "Enema reduction of intussusception : the success rate of hydrostatic and pneumatic reduction", Ther Clin Risk Manag, 11, pp.1837~1842 (2015)
- Betz BW, "Therapeutic enema for pediatric ileocolic intussusception : using a balloon catheter improves efficacy", Emerg Radiol, 20, pp.385~391 (2013)
- Ito Y, "Japanese guidelines for the management of intussusception in children, 2011", Pediatr Int, 54, pp.948~958 (2012)
- Ginai AZ, "Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage. Effects on peritoneum", Br J Radiol, 58, pp.969~978 (1985)
- Zentar MS, "Hemodynamic shock caused by tension pneumoperitoneum in a 5-yearold girl", Pediatr Emerg Care, 34, pp.e102~e103 (2018)
- Liu ST, "Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction versus fluoroscopy-guided air reduction for pediatric intussusception : a multi-center, prospective, cohort study", World J Emerg Surg, 16, pp.3~ (2021)
- Xie X, "A randomized trial of pneumatic reduction versus hydrostatic reduction for intussusception in pediatric patients", J Pediatr Surg, 53, pp.1464~1468 (2018)
- Tang XB, "Status survey on enema reduction of paediatric intussusception in China", J Int Med Res, 47, pp.859~866 (2019)
- Gfroerer S, "Ultrasound-guided reduction of intussusception : a safe and effective method performed by pediatric surgeons", Pediatr Surg Int, 32, pp.679~682 (2016)
- Hadidi AT, "Childhood intussusception : a comparative study of nonsurgical management", J Pediatr Surg, 34, pp.304~307 (1999)
- Alehossein M, "Comparison of different modalities for reducing childhood intussusception", Iran J Radiol, 8, pp.83~87 (2011)
- Kaplan SL, "Intussusception reduction : effect of air vs. liquid enema on radiation dose", Pediatr Radiol, 47, pp.1471~1476 (2017)
- Chutiwongthanaphat K, "Retrospective comparison study of non-operative treatment between saline hydrostatic reduction under ultrasonographic guidance and pneumatic reduction under fluoroscopic guidance in intussusception patients at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health", J Dep Med Serv, 46, pp.115~119 (2022)
- Pusˇnik L, "Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception : comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents", Eur J Pediatr, 182, pp.3257~3264 (2023)