본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Comparison of treatment of forearm fractures by pediatric emergency physicians versus orthopedic residents in a pediatric emergency department

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류소아과학

초록

Purpose: Forearm fractures are frequently seen in emergency departments (EDs), with displaced fractures usually treated by closed reduction (CR), typically performed by orthopedic surgeons. However, pediatric emergency medicine physicians (PEMPs) are also trained to treat the fractures. Non- or minimally-displaced fractures that require casting or splinting are even more common. Limited data are available to evaluate the outcome of such procedures performed by PEMPs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients younger than 18 years with forearm fractures who underwent CRs in the ED from January 2017 through December 2021. The primary outcomes were successful CR and ED length of stay (EDLOS). The secondary outcomes were hospitalization and positive prognosis at follow-ups, defined as adequate fracture healing without the need for additional interventions. The positive prognosis was analyzed not only from the study population but also from patients with non- or minimally-displaced fractures who forwent CRs. The outcomes were compared between the patients undergoing CRs performed by orthopedic residents or PEMPs. Results: Of 120 patients who underwent CRs, successful CR was observed in 93.3% (112/120), with no difference between the 2 groups (orthopedic residents, 92.2% vs. PEMPs, 95.3%; P = 0.508). A mean EDLOS (minutes) was shorter in the PEMP group (orthopedic residents, 297.5 ± 58.2 vs. PEMPs, 228.9 ± 102.4; P < 0.001). The hospitalization and positive prognosis showed no differences between the groups. Of 559 patients with non- or minimally-displaced fractures, the positive prognosis showed no difference between the groups (orthopedic residents, 27.8% vs. PEMPs, 32.4%; P = 0.128). Conclusion: PEMPs can safely perform forearm fracture reductions by effectively selecting cases with a high likelihood of success. These cases may be managed without an orthopedic referral, leading to shorter EDLOS and enhanced patient satisfaction without compromising results.

Abstract

Purpose: Forearm fractures are frequently seen in emergency departments (EDs), with displaced fractures usually treated by closed reduction (CR), typically performed by orthopedic surgeons. However, pediatric emergency medicine physicians (PEMPs) are also trained to treat the fractures. Non- or minimally-displaced fractures that require casting or splinting are even more common. Limited data are available to evaluate the outcome of such procedures performed by PEMPs. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study on patients younger than 18 years with forearm fractures who underwent CRs in the ED from January 2017 through December 2021. The primary outcomes were successful CR and ED length of stay (EDLOS). The secondary outcomes were hospitalization and positive prognosis at follow-ups, defined as adequate fracture healing without the need for additional interventions. The positive prognosis was analyzed not only from the study population but also from patients with non- or minimally-displaced fractures who forwent CRs. The outcomes were compared between the patients undergoing CRs performed by orthopedic residents or PEMPs. Results: Of 120 patients who underwent CRs, successful CR was observed in 93.3% (112/120), with no difference between the 2 groups (orthopedic residents, 92.2% vs. PEMPs, 95.3%; P = 0.508). A mean EDLOS (minutes) was shorter in the PEMP group (orthopedic residents, 297.5 ± 58.2 vs. PEMPs, 228.9 ± 102.4; P < 0.001). The hospitalization and positive prognosis showed no differences between the groups. Of 559 patients with non- or minimally-displaced fractures, the positive prognosis showed no difference between the groups (orthopedic residents, 27.8% vs. PEMPs, 32.4%; P = 0.128). Conclusion: PEMPs can safely perform forearm fracture reductions by effectively selecting cases with a high likelihood of success. These cases may be managed without an orthopedic referral, leading to shorter EDLOS and enhanced patient satisfaction without compromising results.

관련 논문AI추천

Effects of obtaining plain radiographs in pediatric patients with radial head subluxation안력, 강지훈, 황정성대한소아응급의학회 · 대한소아응급의학회지2025 · 제12권 제1호Preliminary comparison of length of stay of patients treated by 3 board-certified physicians and 1 pediatric resident in the emergency department during night shifts구청모, 김문규, 배고은, 윤서희, 은소현대한소아응급의학회 · 대한소아응급의학회지2022 · 제9권 제1호Pain Passport as a tool to improve analgesic use in children with suspected fractures in emergency departmentsDo Kyun Kim, Eun Mi Ham, Hyuksool Kwon, Jae Yun Jung, Joong Wan Park, Soyun Hwang, Yeongho Choi, Yoo Jin Choi, Young Ho Kwak대한통증학회 · The Korean Journal of Pain2020 · 제33권 제4호The impact of reduced pediatric emergency care hours on the patterns of emergency department utilization박성수, 오준석, 이재광, 최현수, 허승호대한소아응급의학회 · 대한소아응급의학회지2024 · 제11권 제4호Cosmetic outcomes of simple facial laceration suturing in the pediatric emergency departmentElad Sela, Eyal Heiman, Eyal Reiss, Giora Weiser, Yoav Gronovich대한소아응급의학회 · 대한소아응급의학회지2024 · 제11권 제2호소아응급전담전문의 진료 도입에 따른 소아응급진료 양상 변화김 훈, 김백현, 김상철, 김영민, 박관진, 이석우, 채현석대한소아응급의학회 · 대한소아응급의학회지2024 · 제11권 제3호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)