Data Volume based Trust Metric for Blockchain Networks
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
With the appearance of Bitcoin that builds peer-to-peer networks for transaction of digital content and issuance of cryptocurrency, lots of blockchain networks have been developed to improve transaction performance. Recently, Joseph Lubin discussed Decentralization Transaction per Second (DTPS) against alleviating the value of biased TPS. However, this Lubin’s trust model did not enough consider a security issue in scalability trilemma. Accordingly, we proposed a trust metric based on blockchain size, stale block rate, and average block size, using a sigmoid function and convex optimization. Via numerical analysis, we presented the optimal blockchain size of popular blockchain networks and then compared the proposed trust metric with the Lubin’s trust model. Besides, Bitcoin based blockchain networks such as Litecoin were superior to Ethereum for trust satisfaction and data volume.
Abstract
With the appearance of Bitcoin that builds peer-to-peer networks for transaction of digital content and issuance of cryptocurrency, lots of blockchain networks have been developed to improve transaction performance. Recently, Joseph Lubin discussed Decentralization Transaction per Second (DTPS) against alleviating the value of biased TPS. However, this Lubin’s trust model did not enough consider a security issue in scalability trilemma. Accordingly, we proposed a trust metric based on blockchain size, stale block rate, and average block size, using a sigmoid function and convex optimization. Via numerical analysis, we presented the optimal blockchain size of popular blockchain networks and then compared the proposed trust metric with the Lubin’s trust model. Besides, Bitcoin based blockchain networks such as Litecoin were superior to Ethereum for trust satisfaction and data volume.
참고문헌 (16)
- A. Hafid, "Scaling Blockchains : A Comprehensive Survey", IEEE Access, 8, pp.125244~125262 (2020)[DOI]
- A. Chauhan, "Blockchain and scalability", 2018IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), pp.122~128 (2018), IEEE
- A. Gervais, "On the security and performance of Proof of Work blockchains", 23rd ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp.3~16 (2016), ACM
- "Medium. EOS + DAPP Network: How This Is The Key To Scalable Applications" (2019)[URL]
- "Decrypt. An Overview of the State of the Blockchain Ecosystem" (2019)[URL]
- "Study: 75% of EOS Dapp Transactions Are Now Made By Bots" (2014)[URL]
- N. Kannengießer, "Trade-offs between distributed ledger technology characteristics", ACM Computing Surveys(CSUR), 53(2), pp.1~37 (2020)[DOI]
- M. Alharby, "Blocksim:An extensible simulation tool for blockchain systems" (2020)
- K. Croman, "On scaling decentralized blockchains", International conference on financial cryptography and data security, pp.106~125 (2016), Springer
- S. H. Jeon, "Energy outage-aware power distribution scheme for off-grid base station operation", IEEE Communications Letters, 21(6), pp.1401~1404 (2017)[DOI]
- J. S. Lee, "Energy-Efficient TDMA Scheduling for UVS Tactical MANET", IEEE Communications Letters, 23(11), pp.62126~62129 (2019)[DOI]
- "International Business Times. What is Dogecoin? The Meme that Became the Hot New Virtual Currency" (2013)[URL]
- S. Boyd, "Convex Optimization" (2004), Cambridge Univ. Press