본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Reform of the Consensual Divorce Process and the Child Support Enforcement System in Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In 2007 and 2009, the National Assembly, the Korean legislature, enacted laws to address some of the problems caused by the high divorce rate. The resulting changes in the divorce process in Korea are twofold: one is the overall reform of the consensual divorce process, and the other is the introduction of a special child support enforcement system. One of the two main features of consensual divorce process reformation is the adoption of the waiting period system. One aim of the waiting system is to protect minor children from their parent’s hasty divorce. The second feature of the reformation is that spouses who apply for divorce, if they have minor children, should submit to the family court either an agreement concerning the rearing of their children or the original copy of the decision of the court on the same issue as a substitute for an agreement. Also, under the new special child support enforcement system, the protocol of the child support agreement is recognized as a title of execution and the direct payment order system is introduced to secure the child support payment. In addition, during the past 18th legislative period, several bills were proposed to adopt the advance child support payment system though they failed to pass the National Assembly.

Abstract

In 2007 and 2009, the National Assembly, the Korean legislature, enacted laws to address some of the problems caused by the high divorce rate. The resulting changes in the divorce process in Korea are twofold: one is the overall reform of the consensual divorce process, and the other is the introduction of a special child support enforcement system. One of the two main features of consensual divorce process reformation is the adoption of the waiting period system. One aim of the waiting system is to protect minor children from their parent’s hasty divorce. The second feature of the reformation is that spouses who apply for divorce, if they have minor children, should submit to the family court either an agreement concerning the rearing of their children or the original copy of the decision of the court on the same issue as a substitute for an agreement. Also, under the new special child support enforcement system, the protocol of the child support agreement is recognized as a title of execution and the direct payment order system is introduced to secure the child support payment. In addition, during the past 18th legislative period, several bills were proposed to adopt the advance child support payment system though they failed to pass the National Assembly.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. "Bill Information System"[URL]
  2. "Bill Information System"[URL]
  3. "Bill Information System"[URL]
  4. "Bill Information System"[URL]
  5. 이봉림, "이혼시 자녀양육비 확보제도에 관한 고찰", 성균관법학, 21(2), pp.105~127 (2009), 법학연구소
  6. "Civil Act, art. 836-2", ~
  7. "Civil Act, art. 837-2", ~
  8. "Civil Procedure Act, art. 123", ~
  9. "Family Procedure Act, art. 63-2", ~
  10. "Family Procedure Act, art. 63-3", ~
  11. "Family Procedure Act, art. 67", ~
  12. "Family Procedure Act, art. 67-2", ~
  13. "Family Procedure Act, art. 68", ~
  14. , Act. No. 4300, Dec. 31, 1990, art. 48-2,
  15. 전혜정, "양육비 이행확보제도 - 양육비 직접지급명령제도를 중심으로-", 법과정책, 17(1), pp.217~244 (2011), 법과정책연구소
  16. Hyunsoo Jeong, "Some Thoughts About the System of Securing the Child Support under the Revised Family Procedure Act", Human Right and Justice, 63 (2009), Korean Bar Association
  17. "Korean Statistical Information Service"[URL]
  18. , Act No. 471, Feb. 22, 1958, art. 834,
  19. Study about the Law and System for Securing the Enforcement of Child Support, "Ministry of Gender Equality and Family", 130~ (2011)
  20. , Act. No. 6627, Jan. 26, 2002, art. 61,
  21. Vol. 2 466, , 2010
  22. 김상수, "양육비채권의 이행확보를 위한 직접지급명령제도", 법조, 58(9), pp.5~31 (2009), 법조협회
  23. 윤우일, "양육비대지급의 실효성을 제고하기 위한 제도적 방안", 외법논집, 35(4), pp.267~281 (2011), 법학연구소
  24. 김연, "양육비 지급의무의 이행에 관한 소송법적 연구", 민사소송, 15(1), pp.82~124 (2011), 한국민사소송법학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)