본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Apportionment of Profits to a Permanent Establishment: Similarities and Differences in the UK, the US and the Republic of Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Apportionment of profits to a permanent establishment is to determine the taxable business profits of a part of a multinational enterprise within the source country. The recent position of the OECD is to apply the separate enterprise approach with the functional and factual analysis. This article focuses on two aspects. The first one is to characterize the activities carried through a permanent establishment when it deals with the head office or the other parts of the same enterprise. The second is the deductibility of expenses which includes the question of notional charges on internal dealings and the issue of indirect expenses incurred by the enterprise as a whole for the common purposes. The UK, the US and Korea have had different tax law to deal with these issues, while they have shared some similarities. The relevant Articles of the current OECD Model Convention and the Commentary will be analysed in advance, as it helps to interpret and understand those different systems and provides a certain guidance to compare them. Several problems contained in the authorized OECD approach and some possible solutions will be discussed at the final part of this article.

Abstract

Apportionment of profits to a permanent establishment is to determine the taxable business profits of a part of a multinational enterprise within the source country. The recent position of the OECD is to apply the separate enterprise approach with the functional and factual analysis. This article focuses on two aspects. The first one is to characterize the activities carried through a permanent establishment when it deals with the head office or the other parts of the same enterprise. The second is the deductibility of expenses which includes the question of notional charges on internal dealings and the issue of indirect expenses incurred by the enterprise as a whole for the common purposes. The UK, the US and Korea have had different tax law to deal with these issues, while they have shared some similarities. The relevant Articles of the current OECD Model Convention and the Commentary will be analysed in advance, as it helps to interpret and understand those different systems and provides a certain guidance to compare them. Several problems contained in the authorized OECD approach and some possible solutions will be discussed at the final part of this article.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Ahn, Chang Nam, "A Study on the Necessity of Re-establishment of the Attribution of Profits to the Dependent Agent Permanent Establishments in Korea – under the Authorized OECD Approach -", Tax Law Journals, 26(1), pp.277~310 (2010)
  2. Andrus, Joseph, "The United States", pp.1~26 (2011)
  3. Arnold, Brian J, "International Tax Primer, 2nd edition" (2002), Kluwer Law International
  4. Avery Jones, John F, "The United Kingdom’s influence on the OECD Model Tax Convention", British Tax Review, 6, pp.653~683 (2011)
  5. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S., "The Structure of International Taxation: A Proposal for Simplification", Texas Law Review, 74, pp.1301~1359 (1996)
  6. Avi-Yonah, Reuven S, "International Tax as International Law -An Analysis of the International Tax Regime-, In Cambridge Tax Law Series" (2007), Cambridge University Press
  7. Baker, Philip, "A note on recent UK tax treaty developments", British Tax Review, 2, pp.125~131 (2011)
  8. Bennett, Mary, "Article 7 – New OECD Rules for Attributing Profits to Permanent Establishments", 21~36 (2011)
  9. Birla, Arun, "The attribution of profits – fact or fiction?", British Tax Review, 2, pp.207~221 (2005)
  10. Blokker, Niels, "Skating on thin ice? On the law of international organizations and the legal nature of the Commentaries on the OECD Model Tax Convention", 13~27 (2008)
  11. Brown, Fred B, "Federal Income Taxation of U. S. Branches of Foreign Corporations : Separate Entity or Separate Rules?", Tax Law Review(New York University), 49, pp.133~207 (1993)
  12. Burgers, Irene J. J., "The New OECD Approach on Profit Allocation : A Step Forward Towards Neutral Treatment of Permanent Establishments and Subsidiaries", Florida Tax Review, 10, pp.51~76 (2009)
  13. Caster, Brian, "After Natwest : How Courts Should Handle OECD Commentary in Double Taxation Treaty Interpretations", Northwestern University Law Review, 105, pp.1317~1346 (2011)
  14. Choi, Seonjip, "The method of allocation of expenses incurred by the head office", The National Tax, 522, pp.45~51 (2010)
  15. Douma, Sjoerd, "The Legal Status of the OECD Commentaries, Conflict of Norms in International Tax Law Series" (2008), IBFD
  16. Garner, Allison S, "Corporate and International Taxation -Analyses and Reforms-" (2011), Nova Science Publishers
  17. Gordon, Keith M, "Tiley and Collison’s UK Tax Guide 2011-2012, 29th edition" (2011), LexisNexis
  18. Groff, Alfred C, "Selected Issues in U.S. Taxation of U.S. Branches of Foreign Banks", University of Illinois Law Review, pp.343~369 (1988)
  19. Harris, Peter, "International Commercial Tax, Cambridge Tax Law Series" (2010), Cambridge University Press
  20. International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation, "The Taxation of Permanent Establishments, Binder 3" (2005), IBFD Publications
  21. Kane, Mitchell, "Case Comment: National Westminster Bank Plc v Internal Revenue Commissioner (US)", British Taw Review, pp.44~54 (2000)
  22. Kim, Jaeseung, "Taxation of Permanent Establishment of a Foreign Corporation – A case Study of a Foreign Corporation with Passive Income Effectively Connected With Its Permanent Establishment-", Law Reviews (Jeonnam National University), 29(1), pp.241~265 (2009)
  23. Kirsch, Michael S., "The Role of Physical Presence in the Taxation of Crossborder Personal Services", Boston College Law Review, 51, pp.993~1080 (2010)
  24. Kobetsky, Michael, "International Taxation of Permanent Establishments -Principles and Policy-, In Cambridge Tax Law Series" (2011), Cambridge University Press
  25. Krever, Richard, "Tax Conversations : A Guide to the Key Issues in the Tax Reform" (1997), Kluwer Law International
  26. Lang, Michael, "Avoidance of Double Non-Taxation" (2003), Linde Verlag
  27. Larking, Barry, "The United Kingdom, in International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation", 1~92 (2005)
  28. 이창희, "고정사업장의 과세", 조세법연구, 13(2), pp.216~259 (2007), 한국세법학회
  29. Lee, Chang Hee, "Tax Law, 9th" (2011), Pakyoungsa
  30. Lee, Natalie, "Revenue Law – Principles and Practice, 26th edition" (2008), Tottel Publishing
  31. Muller, Johan, "Attribution of Profits to PE: A Business Perspective", 51~62 (2011)
  32. OECD, "Transfer Pricing Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises and Tax Administrations", ~ (1995)
  33. OECD, "Commentary on Article 7", ~ (2008)
  34. Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2008)
  35. OECD, "Commentary on Article 7 Concerning the Taxation of Business Profits" (2010)
  36. OECD, "Introduction OECD Model 2010" (2010)
  37. OECD, "Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments Part I", ~ (2010)
  38. OECD, "OECD"
  39. Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments Part II, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2010)
  40. Picciotto, Sol, "International Business Taxation" (1992), George Weidenfeld and Nicolson
  41. Weber, "The 2010 Elimination of Article 7-3 (1963)", 37~49 (2011)
  42. Pires, Manuel, "International Juridical Double Taxation of Income, Series on International" (1989), Kluwer Law and Taxation Publishers
  43. van Raad, Kees, "Materials on International & EU Tax Law, 11th edition, Vol. I" (2011), International Tax Center Leiden
  44. Reimer, Ekkehart, "Permanent Establishments, A Domestic Taxation, Bilateral Tax Treaty and OECD Perspective" (2011), Kluwer Law International
  45. Ring, Diane M., "International Tax Relations: Theory and Implications", Tax Law Review (New York University), 60, pp.439~485 (2007)
  46. Roin, Julie, "Can the Income Tax Be Saved? The Promise and Pitfalls of Adopting Worldwide Formulary Apportionment", Tax Law Review (New York University), 61, pp.169~240 (2008)
  47. Rosenbloom, H, "The United States,In Bureau of Fiscal Documentation", 1-92, 1~92 (2005)
  48. Sandler, Daniel, "Tax Treaties and Controlled Foreign Company Legislation, 2nd" (1998), Kluwer Law International
  49. Seo, Kiseok, "The taxation on the foreign corporation-focusing on the cases of the Supreme Court-", Study of Special Law, 5, pp.429~471 (1997)
  50. Shaw, Malcolm N., "International Law, 6th" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  51. Shelton, Ned, "Interpretation and Application of Tax" (2004), LexisNexis
  52. Tiley, John, "Revenue Law, 6th" (2008), Hart Publishing
  53. Thirlway, Hugh, "The role of the international law concepts of acquiescence and estoppels", 29~49 (2008)
  54. "Tolley’s Corporation Tax 2011-2012" (2011), LexisNexis
  55. Weber, Dennis, "The 2010 OECD Updates – Model Tax Convention & Transfer Pricing Guidelines, A Critical Review -, Series on International Taxation" (2011), Kluwer Law International

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (3건)