본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Current Issues in Physician Payment in the United States and the Republic of South Korea

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This paper examines insurance payment for physician services and compares the challenges confronting Korea and the United States. In both countries health insurance generally subsidizes physician services, on the basis of fees for services provided. In the presence of widespread insurance, there is no market-based customary or prevailing fee which insurers can use to set fees. Alternative methods of setting fees are controversial. Further, fee for service payment creates incentives for unnecessary, costly, and sometimes damaging care. The paper examines the fifty year U.S. history testing many approaches to setting fees for physician services provided to insured patients. Thus far, none has proven successful in keeping physician costs within general increases in GDP and inflation or in providing incentives for appropriate, quality care. In the past decade, conflicts between Korean physicians and the national health insurance system have twice resulted in national physician strikes. These conflicts involve many issues, including the separating of proscribing and providing drugs and telemedicine. This paper suggests that a persistent underlying concern of Korean doctors is that fees are inadequate and force doctors to provide excessive volume of service. Finally, the paper argues that both the United States and Korea would benefit from the adoption of alternatives to fee for service that promote more collaborative medical services. Key Words: Physician Payment, Health Insurance & Physician Payment, Telemedicine, Separation of Prescribing and Provision of Drugs, Physician Payment & the Organization of Health Care.

Abstract

This paper examines insurance payment for physician services and compares the challenges confronting Korea and the United States. In both countries health insurance generally subsidizes physician services, on the basis of fees for services provided. In the presence of widespread insurance, there is no market-based customary or prevailing fee which insurers can use to set fees. Alternative methods of setting fees are controversial. Further, fee for service payment creates incentives for unnecessary, costly, and sometimes damaging care. The paper examines the fifty year U.S. history testing many approaches to setting fees for physician services provided to insured patients. Thus far, none has proven successful in keeping physician costs within general increases in GDP and inflation or in providing incentives for appropriate, quality care. In the past decade, conflicts between Korean physicians and the national health insurance system have twice resulted in national physician strikes. These conflicts involve many issues, including the separating of proscribing and providing drugs and telemedicine. This paper suggests that a persistent underlying concern of Korean doctors is that fees are inadequate and force doctors to provide excessive volume of service. Finally, the paper argues that both the United States and Korea would benefit from the adoption of alternatives to fee for service that promote more collaborative medical services. Key Words: Physician Payment, Health Insurance & Physician Payment, Telemedicine, Separation of Prescribing and Provision of Drugs, Physician Payment & the Organization of Health Care.

참고문헌 (51)

  1. Miriam Laugesen, "Higher Fees Paid to US Physicians Drive Higher Spending for Physician Services Compared to Other Countries", Health Affairs, 30, pp.1647~ (2011)
  2. Thomas Pikitty, "Capital in the 21st Century", ~ (2014)
  3. David D. Kirkpatrick, "A.M.A. Endorses a Health Care Overhaul", N.Y. Times, ~ (2009)
  4. T.R. Reid, "The Healing of America", 165~175 (2009)
  5. Elisabeth Rosenthal, "Patients’Costs Sky Rocket; Specialists’Incomes Soar", N.Y. Times, ~ (2014)
  6. "Physician Supply & The Affordable Care Act, Congressional Research Service" (2013)[URL]
  7. "World Factbook" (2014)[URL]
  8. Sylvia A. Law, "Blue Cross: What Went Wrong", ~ (1973)
  9. Paul Starr, "The Social Transformation of American Medicine", ~ (1982)
  10. Paul Starr, "The Social Transformation of American Medicine 90-112", ~ (1982)
  11. Kenneth Thorpe, "Does All-Payer Rate Setting Work? The Case of the New York Prospective Hospital Reimbursement Methodology", J. Health Politics, Policy & L, 12, pp.391~ (1987)
  12. Eduardo Porter, "Lessons in Maryland for Costs at Hospitals", N.Y. Times, ~ (2013)
  13. Lucian L. Leape, "Five Years After To Err is Human: What Have We Learned?", JAMA, 293, pp.2384~ (2005)
  14. Barry R. Furrow, "Regulating Patient Safety: The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act", U. Pa. L. Rev, 159, pp.1727~ (2011)
  15. William H. Rogers, "Quality of Care Before and After Implementation of the DRG Based Prospective Payment System", JAMA, 264, pp.1989~ (2010)
  16. Uwe E. Reinhardt, "The Many Different Prices Paid to Providers and the Flowed Theory of Cost Shifting: Is It Time for a More Rational All-Payor System?", Health Affairs, 30, pp.2125~ (2011)
  17. Mark A. Hall, "The Death of Managed Care: A Regulatory Autopsy", Health Pol. Pol’y & L, 30, pp.427~ (2005)
  18. James C. Robinson, "The End of Managed Care", JAMA, 285, pp.2622~ (2001)
  19. Sara Rosenbaum, "Law and the American Health Care System 210-218", ~ (2012)
  20. Elisabeth Rosenthal, "The $2.7 Trillion Medical Bill", N.Y. Times, ~ (2013)
  21. J. Paul Leigh, "Annual Work Hours Across Physician Specialties", Arch . Intern Med, 171, pp.1211~ (2011)
  22. Ann Marie Marciarille, "Bending the Health Cost Curve: The Promise and Peril of the Independent Payment Advisory Board", Health Matrix, 22, pp.75~ (2012)
  23. "Doc Fix New Weapon vs. Health Reform" (2010)[URL]
  24. "Medicare ‘oc Fix’Put on Life Support by AMA Lobby" (2011)[URL]
  25. Jonathan Oberlander, "Failure to Launch? The Independent Payment Advisory Board’ Uncertain Prospects", N. Eng. J. Med, 369, pp.105~ (2013)
  26. "Don’ Give Up on Health Care Cost Control" (2013)[URL]
  27. Steven Schroeder, "for the National Commission on Physician Payment Reform", N. Eng. J. Med, 368, pp.2029~ (2013)
  28. Amy Goodnough, "New Law’ Demands on Doctors Have Many Seeking a Network", N.Y.Times, ~ (2014)
  29. Elisabeth Rosenthal, "Apprehensive, Many Doctors Shift to Jobs With Salaries", N.Y. Times, ~ (2014)
  30. Garner Harris, "More Physicians Say No to Endless Workdays", N.Y. Times, ~ (2011)
  31. Soonman Kwon, "Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage", Health Policy & Planning, 24, pp.63~ (2009)
  32. Health-Care Reform in Korea, "Randall S. Jones", OECD Publishing, ~, pp.797 OECD Economics Department Working Papers 6 (2010)
  33. Dana P. Goldman, "Prescription Drug Cost Sharing: Associations With Medication and Medical Utilization and Spending on Health FREE", JAMA, 298, pp.61~ (2007)
  34. Soonman Kwon, "Payment system reform for health care providers in Korea", Health Policy & Planning, 18, pp.84~ (2003)
  35. Byongho Tchoe, "Diagnosis-Related Group-based Payment System and its Reform Plan in Korea", Japanese J. of Health Economics & Policy, 21, pp.213~ (2010)
  36. Soonman Kwon, "Pharmaceutical reform and physician strikes in Korea: separation of drug prescribing and dispensing", Soc. Science & Med, 57, pp.529~ (2003)
  37. Hak-Ju Kim, "Pharmaceutical Reform in South Korea and the Lessons it Provides", Health Affairs, 27, pp.w260~ (2008)
  38. Wang Jung Lee, "MD, What Drove Korean Doctors into the Streets?", Virtual Mentor, 6, pp.1~ (2004)
  39. Byong-Hee Cho, "Conflicts between Civil Society and Medical Doctors Shown in the Doctors’Strike", Korean Bioethics Assoc, 1, pp.35~ (2000)
  40. "S. Korea Plans to Start Telemedicine in 2015" (2013)[URL]
  41. "Doctors Protest Telemedicine, For-Profit Operations" (2013)[URL]
  42. "Doctors Go On Strike in Protest of Gov’ Policy" (2014)[URL]
  43. "Health Situation and Trends Assessment: Telemedicine Project in Democratic People’Republic of Korea"[URL]
  44. 문종윤, "환자-의사 간 원격의료 제도 도입에 대한 법적 사회적 적합성 고찰", 한국의료법학회지, 21(2), pp.201~219 (2013), 한국의료법학회
  45. Nicola S. Pocock, "Medical Tourism and policy implications for health systems: a conceptual framework from a comparative study of Thailand, Singapore and Malaysia", Globalization & Health, 7, pp.12~ (2011)
  46. Elinor Lee, "Health Privitization Policies and Korean National Insurance Program", J. of Social Science, 28, pp.129~ (2009)
  47. Atul Gawande, "The Cost Conundrum: What a Texas Town Can Teach us About health care", The New Yorker, ~ (2009)
  48. John K. Iglehart, "Spreading the Safety New –Obstacles to the Expansion of Community Health Centers", N. Eng. J. Med, 358, pp.1321~ (2008)
  49. Eli Adash, "Health Care Reform and Primary Care: The Growing Importance of the Community Health Center", N.Eng.J.Med, 362, pp.2047~ (2010)
  50. "Reforming the Way Physicians Are Paid" (2014)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)