바이든 정부의 세계 및 동맹체제 전략: 정체성 정치, 문명충돌, 그리고 글로벌 공급망을 중심으로
Biden Administration’s Strategy for Global Alliance: Identity Politics, Clash of Civilizations, and Global Supply Chains
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study analyzes the Biden Administration’s global alliance strategy. Proceeding from the context of confrontation with the People’s Republic of China, the Biden Administration’s strategy for global alliance is hinged on the notions of “identity politics” and “clash of civilizations.” Through these processes, the United States is rebuilding and reorganizing the global space of political economy. Today, the bilateral relations between the United States and China has moved beyond the scope of cooperation based on the “Kissinger Order” and has arrived at the system of confrontation. The Biden Administration is planning and building a new global alliance framework that is intended to keep China in check, and this framework is creating a post-Kissinger order. The new global framework includes alliances and gatherings of democratic countries(D-10 and Summits for Democracy), economic partnerships with allied and pro-US countries based on reorganizing global supply chains(IPEF), and expansion of various military security organizations(bilateral alliances, AUKUS, Quad, and Five Eyes). After the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden Administration’s global alliance strategy exhibits the hybrid characteristic of merging the security framework with the economic framework, the latter of which is represented by the reorganization of global supply chains.
Abstract
This study analyzes the Biden Administration’s global alliance strategy. Proceeding from the context of confrontation with the People’s Republic of China, the Biden Administration’s strategy for global alliance is hinged on the notions of “identity politics” and “clash of civilizations.” Through these processes, the United States is rebuilding and reorganizing the global space of political economy. Today, the bilateral relations between the United States and China has moved beyond the scope of cooperation based on the “Kissinger Order” and has arrived at the system of confrontation. The Biden Administration is planning and building a new global alliance framework that is intended to keep China in check, and this framework is creating a post-Kissinger order. The new global framework includes alliances and gatherings of democratic countries(D-10 and Summits for Democracy), economic partnerships with allied and pro-US countries based on reorganizing global supply chains(IPEF), and expansion of various military security organizations(bilateral alliances, AUKUS, Quad, and Five Eyes). After the COVID-19 pandemic, the Biden Administration’s global alliance strategy exhibits the hybrid characteristic of merging the security framework with the economic framework, the latter of which is represented by the reorganization of global supply chains.
참고문헌 (94)
- 미국 마이든행정부 시대 미중 전략경쟁과 한국의 선택 연구, "김흥규", 대외경제정책연구원, ~ (2021)
- 니얼 퍼거슨, "금융의 지배" (2016), 민음사
- 문정인, "문정인의 미래 시나리오: 코로나 19, 미중 신냉전, 한국의 선택" (2021), 청림출판
- 새뮤얼 헌팅턴, "문명의 충돌" (1997), 김영사
- 스티븐 월터, "미국외교의 대전략" (2021), 김앤김북스
- 이용인, "미국의 아시아 회귀 전략" (2014), 창비
- 정재호, "생존의 기로: 21세기 미중 관계와 한국" (2021), 서울대학교 출판문화원
- 최진욱, "중국의 주변외교 전략 연구 : 중국의 대북정책 결정에 대한 함의" (2014), 통일연구원
- 프란시스 후쿠야마, "역사의 종말" (1992), 한마음사
- 마이클 필스버리, "백년의 마라톤: 마오쩌둥 덩샤오핑 시진핑의 세계 패권 대장정" (2016), 영림카디널
- 문정인, "MZ세대가 궁금해하는 한반도 평화통일 이야기" (2021), 국립통일교육원
- 헨리 키신저, "중국 이야기" (2012), 민음사
- Economy, Elizabeth, "The Third Revolution : Xi Jinping and the New Chinese State" (2018), Oxford Univ. Press
- Fukuyama, Francis, "Identity : The Demand for Dignity and The Politics of Resentment" (2018), Farrar, Straus and Giroux
- Haldeman, H. R, "The Haldeman Diaries : Inside the Nixon White House" (1994), Putnam
- Doshi, Rush, "The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order" (2021), Oxford Univ. Press
- Hass, Ryan, "Stronger: Adapting America’s China Strategy in an Age of Competitive Interdependence" (2021), Yale University Press
- Kang-nyeong Kim, "미중관계의 전개와 현안문제 및 시사점", 한국과 국제사회, 2(2), pp.89~130 (2018)[DOI]
- 김재관, "미중 전략적 경쟁과 한반도 통일 전망", 국립통일교육원 공공부문 강사세미나 발제문 (2021)
- Jaekwan Kim, "Analysis and Prospect of the Biden Administration’s Foreign Policy toward China: Focusing on the strategic competition between the US and China", Journal of Global Politics, 14(1), pp.77~119 (2021), Institute of Global Politics[DOI]
- Won Gon Park, "Quo Vadis America: The decay of the U.S. and the Advent of the Biden Administration", Peace Studies, 29(1), pp.5~37 (2021), Korea University Peace and Democracy Institute[DOI]
- 성기영, "바이든-시진핑 정상회담 평가와 미중관계에 대한 시사점", 이슈브리프, (316) (2021)
- 윤여준, "바이든 행정부의 4대 핵심 품목 공급망 검토결과 및 시사점", 세계경제 포커스, 4(41) (2021)
- 이선진, "남중국해를 둘러싼 미중 전략경쟁", 제13회 KIMS 손원일 포럼 발표논문 (2016), 해양전략연구소
- 이성우, "바이든 행정부의 대중정책 한국에기회인가?", 이슈&진단, (446) (2021)
- 이장훈, "키신저 질서의 붕괴", 주간조선, (2574) (2019)
- Heajeong Lee, "단극의 환상과 현실: 탈냉전기 미국 대전략의 진화", 한국과국제정치, 36(1), pp.37~79 (2020), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 장준갑, "닉슨의 외교정책 읽기: 탈냉전적 국제주의", 미국사연구, 28, pp.179~205 (2008), 한국미국사학회
- 동맹의 역사, "전재성", EAI 국가안보패널, ~, pp.<EAI 국가안보패널 연구보고서>, No. 33 (2009)
- 전재성, "바이든 미국 민주당 대통령 후보의 외교정책 공약과 미래의 세계질서", EAI 스페셜 리포트 (2020)
- KeongRan Cho, "The Possibility of Restructuring Tianxia Order and Confucian Universalism-Ⅱ", Journal of The Society of philosophical studies, 127, pp.33~61 (2019), The Society of Philosophical Studies[DOI]
- 조성렬, "한반도 평화통일 이야기", pp.100~122 (2022), 국립통일교육원
- Cha, Moon-Seok, "미중의 글로벌 전략과 동북아 지정학의 귀환: 한반도 통일 위상학의 변화", 국가전략, 26(1), pp.135~165 (2020), 세종연구소[DOI]
- Taesuh Cha, "The End of Exceptionalism? The Lost Soul of American Hegemony in the Trump Era", Review of International and Area Studies, 28(3), pp.1~30 (2019), Institute of International Affairs, Seoul National University[DOI]
- CHA, TAESUH, "“The Thirty Years’ Crisis, 1989-2019”: Re-reading E. H. Carr", 한국과국제정치, 36(1), pp.1~36 (2020), 극동문제연구소[DOI]
- 한승주, "한국과 정체성 정치(Identity Politics)의 딜레마", IIRI Online Series, (89) (2021)
- 美언론: 바이든 행정부의 반도체 등 주요 산업에 대한 공급망 검토 행정명령 전망, "KITA", KITA, ~ (2021)
- Acemoglu, Daron, "Trump Won’t Be the Last American Populist", Foreign Affairs, 6 (2020)
- Al-Gharbi, Musa, "White men swung to Biden. Trump made gains with black and Latino voters. Why?", The Guardian, ~ (2020)
- Ashford, Emma, "Power and Pragmatism: Reforming American Foreign Policy for the 21st Century, New Voices in Grand Strategy", CNAS, ~ (2019)
- Azari, Julia, "It’s the institutions, Stupid", Foreign Affairs, 98(4) (2019)
- Beckley, Michael, "The Power of Nations : Measuring What Matters", International Security, 43(2) (2018)
- Belafonte, Harry, "Trump Is Standing in Our Way", The New York Times, ~ (2020)
- Biden, Joseph, "Why America Must Lead Again", Foreign Affairs, 99(2) (2020)
- Birdsall, Nacny, "The Post-Washington Consensus : Development after the Crisis", Foreign Affairs, 90(2) (2011)
- Brands, Hal, "Fools Rush Out? The Flawed Logic of Offshore Balancing", The Washington Quarterly, 38(2) (2015)
- Erik Brattberg, "Forget the G7, Build the D10", Foreign Policy (2020)
- Brownsteim, Ronald, "Democrats’ Real Liability in the House", The Atlantic, ~ (2020)
- Campbell, Kurt M., "How America Can Shore Up Asian Order", Foreign Affairs (2021)
- Cha, Taesuh, "The Return of Jacksoniaism : The International Implications fo the Trump Phenomenon", The Washington Quarterly, 39(4) (2016)
- CHA, TAESUH, "Trump by Nixon: Maverick Presidents in the Years of U.S. Relative Decline", The Korean journal of defense analysis, 30(1), pp.79~96 (2018), 한국국방연구원[DOI]
- Colum Lynch, "Inside the Massive Foreign-Policy Team Advising Biden’s Campaign", Foreign Policy (2020)
- Fukuyama, Francis, "The End of History?", The National Interest, (16) (1989)
- Goldgeier James, "A Democracy Summit Is Not What the Doctor Ordered", Foreign Affairs (2020)
- The White House, "Interim National Security Strategic Guidance", ~ (2021)
- James Traub, "The Biden Doctrine Exists Already", Foreign Policy (2020)
- "키신저 질서의 붕괴" (2019)[URL]
- "미국, 동맹·우방들과 전방위 중국 견제" (2021)[URL]
- "JTBC", ~ (2021)
- "NEWSIS", ~ (2020)
- "NEWSIS", ~ (2021)
- "SBS", ~ (2020)
- "경향신문", ~ (2021)
- "동아일보", ~ (2020)
- "매일경제", ~ (2019)
- "문화일보", ~ (2020)
- "서울경제", ~ (2021)
- "서울신문", ~ (2021)
- "세계일보", ~ (2021)
- "세계일보", ~ (2022)
- "연합뉴스", ~ (2020)
- "연합뉴스", ~ (2021)
- "日本經濟新聞", ~ (2021)
- "조선일보", ~ (2020)
- "중앙일보", ~ (2015)
- "중앙일보", ~ (2021)
- "파이낸셜뉴스", ~ (2021)
- "한겨레신문", ~ (2020)
- "한겨레신문", ~ (2021)
- "한겨레신문", ~ (2021)
- "한국경제", ~ (2022)
- "한국일보", ~ (2020)
- "한국일보", ~ (2021)
- "The New York Times International Edition", ~ (2021)
- "Washington Post", ~ (2021)
- "Financial Times", ~ (2015)
- "2021 NATO Annual Report"[URL]
- "The G-Minus-2 Threat"[URL]
- "The Battle Inside the Political Parties for the Future of U.S. Foreign Policy" (2018)[URL]
- "D-10 Strategy Forum"[URL]
- "Full text: Joe Biden inauguration speech transcript"[URL]
- "China poses serious challenge to international system" (2021)[URL]
- "2020 Democratic Party Platform" (2020)[URL]
- "Building Resilient Supply Chains, Revitalizing American Manufacturing, and Fostering Broad-Based Growth" (2021)[URL]
