A Study on the Reliability Evaluation Index Development for the Information Resources Retained by Institutions: Focusing on Humanities Assets
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study has the aim of developing an evaluation index that can help evaluate the reliability of the information resources of institutions retaining humanities assets for the purposes of laying out the foundation for providing one-stop portal service for humanities assets. To this end, the evaluation index was derived through the analysis of previous research, case studies, and interviews with experts, the derived evaluation index was then applied to the humanities assets retaining institutions to verify the utility. The institutional information resources’ reliability evaluation index consisted of the two dimensions of the institutions’ own reliability evaluation index. The institution provided a service and system evaluation index. The institutions’ own reliability evaluation index consisted of 25 points for institutional authority, 25 points for data collection and construction, 30 points for data provision, and 20 points for appropriateness of data, for a total of 100 points, respectively. The institution provided service and system evaluation indexes consisting of 25 points for information quality, 15 points for appropriateness (decency), 15 points for accessibility, 20 points for tangibility, 15 points for form, and 10 points for cooperation, for the total of 100 points, respectively. The derived evaluation index was used to evaluate the utility of 6 institutions representing humanities assets through application. Consequently, the reliability of the information resources retained by the Research Information Service System (RISS) of the Korea Education & Research Information Service (KERIS) turned out to be the highest.
Abstract
This study has the aim of developing an evaluation index that can help evaluate the reliability of the information resources of institutions retaining humanities assets for the purposes of laying out the foundation for providing one-stop portal service for humanities assets. To this end, the evaluation index was derived through the analysis of previous research, case studies, and interviews with experts, the derived evaluation index was then applied to the humanities assets retaining institutions to verify the utility. The institutional information resources’ reliability evaluation index consisted of the two dimensions of the institutions’ own reliability evaluation index. The institution provided a service and system evaluation index. The institutions’ own reliability evaluation index consisted of 25 points for institutional authority, 25 points for data collection and construction, 30 points for data provision, and 20 points for appropriateness of data, for a total of 100 points, respectively. The institution provided service and system evaluation indexes consisting of 25 points for information quality, 15 points for appropriateness (decency), 15 points for accessibility, 20 points for tangibility, 15 points for form, and 10 points for cooperation, for the total of 100 points, respectively. The derived evaluation index was used to evaluate the utility of 6 institutions representing humanities assets through application. Consequently, the reliability of the information resources retained by the Research Information Service System (RISS) of the Korea Education & Research Information Service (KERIS) turned out to be the highest.
참고문헌 (23)
- "Berkeley University Library Evaluating Resources"[URL]
- "How universities evaluate faculty performance: A survey of department heads" (1977)[URL]
- 정연경, "인문·사회과학 분야 교수의 연구업적물 평가에 관한 연구", Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 42(3), pp.211~233 (2011), 한국과학기술정보연구원
- Dunsmore, C., "A qualitative study of web-mounted pathfinders created by academic business libraries", Libri, 52(3), pp.137~156 (2002)
- Finkenstaedt, T., "Measuring research performance in the humanities", Scientometrics, 19(5-6), pp.409~417 (1990)
- Stanford-Makovsky web credibility study 2002: Investigating what makes web sites credible today, "Fogg, B. J.", Persuasive Technology Lab, ~ (2002)
- Fogg, B. J., "How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites?: a study with over 2,500 participants", Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences, pp.1~15 (2003), ACM
- Fogg, B. J., "The elements of computer credibility", Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp.80~87 (1999), ACM
- 강주연, "웹 기반 연구기록정보서비스 평가 및 활성화 방안 연구 – NTIS vs. NKIS 비교를 통해 -", 한국기록관리학회지, 17(3), pp.139~160 (2017), 한국기록관리학회[DOI]
- "Georgetown University Library Evaluating Internet Resources"[URL]
- Jackson, R., "Internet subject guides in academic libraries : An analysis of contents, practices, and opinions", Reference & User Services Quarterly, 43(4), pp.319~327 (2004)
- Jackson, R., "The enduring landscape of online subject research guides", Reference & User Services Quarterly, 55(3), pp.212~ (2016)
- Jauch, L. R., "Evaluation of university professors' research performance", Management Science, 22(1), pp.66~75 (1975)
- 정우철, "대학기록관 이용자의 기록정보서비스 평가", 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), pp.195~221 (2016), 한국기록관리학회[DOI]
- "Johns Hopkins University Libraries Evaluating Your Sources"[URL]
- 강회일, "도서관의 온라인 서비스 품질평가: e-LibQual의 적용", 정보관리학회지, 19(3), pp.12~261 (2002), 한국정보관리학회
- 금재덕, "성과정보 신뢰성 제고를 위한 통제시스템 구축방안:영국과 한국사례 비교･분석을 중심으로", 한국정책연구, 12(1), pp.59~75 (2012), 경인행정학회
- 김동노, "인문학 분야 교수 연구업적 평가안 개발", 교육평가연구, 19(3), pp.1~20 (2006), 한국교육평가학회
- Kim, H. S., "A Study on the Development of Evaluation Framework for Public Portal Information Services", Proceedings of the Korea Contents Association Conference, 5(1), pp.440~444 (2007)
- 김수정, "대학도서관 온라인 주제가이드의 현황과 개선방안에 관한 연구", 정보관리학회지, 29(4), pp.165~189 (2012), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
- 김영기, "이용자들의 웹 사이트 신뢰성 평가 방법에 관한 연구", 한국도서관·정보학회지, 38(3), pp.53~72 (2007), 한국도서관·정보학회[DOI]
- 김영기, "웹 사이트의 신뢰성 평가에 영향을 미치는 요인과 각 요인의 중요도에 관한 연구", 한국문헌정보학회지, 41(4), pp.93~111 (2007), 한국문헌정보학회
- 김영기, "온라인 정보원의 비판적 평가를 위한 기준 설정에 관한 연구", 인문학논총, 27, pp.87~109 (2011), 인문과학연구소