본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Study on the Improvement of Korean Journal Citation Index Service

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류문헌정보학

초록

The KJC and KCI services operated by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) need to refer to the global citation index database to set the service direction that researchers want and develop new functions. Therefore, in this study, the usability of Korea's KJC and KCI web databases was evaluated. In addition, FGI verification was performed for a group of experts on KJC and KCI improvement measures derived by academic information experts. The evaluation committee consisted of the researcher group, the society related group, the publisher (academic information distribution organization) group, and the policy-making organization group. A total of 16 experts performed usability evaluation and service improvement proposals for KJC and KCI services. As a result of usability evaluation of KJC and KCI web database using SUS measurement tool, KJC service was evaluated as 73.44, and KCI service was evaluated as good as 64.38. KJC improvement proposals were evaluated positively with 4 points or more for all improvement items, and KCI improvement proposals were positively evaluated with 3.5 points or more for all improvement items. Overall, KJC and KCI error improvements were evaluated with a score of 4 or more, showing strong affirmations. In the future, it is hoped that the improvement proposals and improvements proposed in this study will be applied to the development of KJC and KCI services, so that more quality services will be used by domestic researchers.

Abstract

The KJC and KCI services operated by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) need to refer to the global citation index database to set the service direction that researchers want and develop new functions. Therefore, in this study, the usability of Korea's KJC and KCI web databases was evaluated. In addition, FGI verification was performed for a group of experts on KJC and KCI improvement measures derived by academic information experts. The evaluation committee consisted of the researcher group, the society related group, the publisher (academic information distribution organization) group, and the policy-making organization group. A total of 16 experts performed usability evaluation and service improvement proposals for KJC and KCI services. As a result of usability evaluation of KJC and KCI web database using SUS measurement tool, KJC service was evaluated as 73.44, and KCI service was evaluated as good as 64.38. KJC improvement proposals were evaluated positively with 4 points or more for all improvement items, and KCI improvement proposals were positively evaluated with 3.5 points or more for all improvement items. Overall, KJC and KCI error improvements were evaluated with a score of 4 or more, showing strong affirmations. In the future, it is hoped that the improvement proposals and improvements proposed in this study will be applied to the development of KJC and KCI services, so that more quality services will be used by domestic researchers.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 백희영, "신발 분야 국내외 운동역학 연구동향 분석: 2015-2019년에 발간된 연구를 중심으로", 한국운동역학회지, 30(2), pp.185~195 (2020), 한국운동역학회[DOI]
  2. 조재인, "국내연구자가 출판한 국제학술지 논문의 오픈액세스 현황 - 고피인용된 논문 중심 -", 한국문헌정보학회지, 54(1), pp.325~341 (2020), 한국문헌정보학회
  3. 최원준, "학술논문 통합 DB 구축을 위한 메타데이터 스키마 비교 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 20(2), pp.689~699 (2020), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  4. 정은경, "Web of Science 데이터학술지 게재 데이터논문의 지적구조 규명", 정보관리학회지, 37(1), pp.153~177 (2020), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
  5. Vishwajit Deshmukh, "Histopathological observations in COVID-19: a systematic review", Journal of Clinical Pathology, 74(2), pp.76~83 (2021), BMJ[DOI]
  6. Luiza Fabisiak, "Web Service Usability Analysis Based on User Preferences", Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, 30(4), pp.1~13 (2018), IGI Global[DOI]
  7. 강남규, "KISTI 과학기술정보서비스의 콘텐츠 활용 분석", 인터넷정보학회논문지, 21(4), pp.87~96 (2020), 한국인터넷정보학회[DOI]
  8. Kim, G., "An OA Policy Study on Research Outcomes Funded by Public Institutions", Korean Library and Information Science Society Winter Conference, pp.337~353 (2016)
  9. 김규환, "국내 학술지의 오픈액세스 특성에 관한 연구: KCI 등재지를 대상으로", 정보관리학회지, 34(3), pp.251~267 (2017), 한국정보관리학회[DOI]
  10. 김재훈, "학술논문과 참고문헌의 자동매핑 사례 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 19(11), pp.262~269 (2019), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
  11. 김수전, "한국에서 비만 치료에 쓰이는 한약에 대한 연구 동향 보고: 2015년부터 2019년까지의 국내외 논문을 중심으로", 한방재활의학과학회지, 30(4), pp.89~103 (2020), 한방재활의학과학회[DOI]
  12. Bronwyn A. Kosman, "The impact of learning abroad programs in developing countries: A scoping review", Nurse Education Today, 97, pp.104716~ (2021), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  13. 곽소정, "지도 기반 웹 플랫폼 서비스의 사용성 개선 디자인", 차세대컨버전스정보서비스기술논문지, 9(3), pp.211~221 (2020), 차세대컨버전스정보서비스학회[DOI]
  14. "Citation Index Database Comparison" (2017)[URL]
  15. Erin C McKiernan, "Point of view: How open Science helps Researchers succeed", eLife, 5, pp.e16800~ (2016), eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd[DOI]
  16. Cuong Huu Nguyen, "Bibliographic and content analysis of articles on education from Vietnam indexed in Scopus from 2009 to 2018", Science Editing, 7(1), pp.45~49 (2020), 한국과학학술지편집인협의회[DOI]
  17. 박은미, "기술혁신의 연구 동향 분석: SCOPUS DB를 중심으로", 융합정보논문지, 10(8), pp.120~126 (2020), 중소기업융합학회[DOI]
  18. "Do you know the Citation Index of KCI's Domestic Academic Journals?" (2013)[URL]
  19. 신원기, "환경 과학 분야의 연구 성과 및 동향 분석", 한국환경과학회지, 29(3), pp.283~297 (2020), 한국환경과학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)