Localization of Atypical Femoral Fracture on Straight and Bowed Femurs
2
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: To elucidate the effect of anterolateral bowing on the fracture height of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), we separated the AFFs into 2 groups according to the presence of anterolateral femoral bowing (straight group and bowing group) and analyzed the fracture height. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical and radiological features of AFFs in the straight group and bowing group, and to determine which factors were associated with the fracture height of AFFs in the total cohort and each subgroup. Methods: Ninety-nine patients with AFFs were included in this study (43 patients in the bowing group and 56 patients in the straight group). Clinical and radiological characteristics were compared between the groups. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of factors on fracture height. Results: Patients in the straight group were younger, heavier, and taller, and had a higher bone mineral density, smaller anterior and lateral bowing angles, and more proximal fracture height than those in the bowing group. Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of anterolateral bowing itself and height were associated with fracture height in the total cohort. In the subgroup analysis, the lateral bowing angle in the straight group and the estimated apex height in the bowing group were associated with fracture height. The lateral bowing angle was not significantly associated with fracture height in the total cohort and the bowing group. Conclusions: The presence of anterolateral bowing and the level of the apex of the bowed femur were important factors for the fracture height of AFFs.
Abstract
Background: To elucidate the effect of anterolateral bowing on the fracture height of atypical femoral fractures (AFFs), we separated the AFFs into 2 groups according to the presence of anterolateral femoral bowing (straight group and bowing group) and analyzed the fracture height. The aims of this study were to evaluate the clinical and radiological features of AFFs in the straight group and bowing group, and to determine which factors were associated with the fracture height of AFFs in the total cohort and each subgroup. Methods: Ninety-nine patients with AFFs were included in this study (43 patients in the bowing group and 56 patients in the straight group). Clinical and radiological characteristics were compared between the groups. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to determine the effect of factors on fracture height. Results: Patients in the straight group were younger, heavier, and taller, and had a higher bone mineral density, smaller anterior and lateral bowing angles, and more proximal fracture height than those in the bowing group. Multivariable analysis showed that the presence of anterolateral bowing itself and height were associated with fracture height in the total cohort. In the subgroup analysis, the lateral bowing angle in the straight group and the estimated apex height in the bowing group were associated with fracture height. The lateral bowing angle was not significantly associated with fracture height in the total cohort and the bowing group. Conclusions: The presence of anterolateral bowing and the level of the apex of the bowed femur were important factors for the fracture height of AFFs.
참고문헌 (29)
- Odvina CV, "Severely suppressed bone turnover: a potential complication of alendronate therapy", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 90, pp.1294~1301 (2005)
- 양규현, "Atypical Femoral Fracture: 2015 Position Statement of the Korean Society for Bone and Mineral Research", 대한골대사학회지, 22(3), pp.87~91 (2015), 대한골대사학회[DOI]
- Allen MR, "Three years of alendronate treatment results in similar levels of vertebral microdamage as after one year of treatment", J Bone Miner Res, 22, pp.1759~1765 (2007)
- Lenart BA, "Atypical fractures of the femoral diaphysis in postmenopausal women taking alendronate", N Engl J Med, 358, pp.1304~1306 (2008)
- Koh JS, "Femoral cortical stress lesions in long-term bisphosphonate therapy: a herald of impending fracture", J Orthop Trauma, 24, pp.75~81 (2010)
- Shane E, "Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research", J Bone Miner Res, 25, pp.2267~2294 (2010)
- Unnanuntana A, "Atypical femoral fractures: what do we know about them?: AAOS Exhibit Selection", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, pp.e81~e813 (2013)
- Aspenberg P, "Atypical femoral fractures, bisphosphonates, and mechanical stress", Curr Osteoporos Rep, 12, pp.189~193 (2014)
- Rizzoli R, "Subtrochanteric fractures after long-term treatment with bisphosphonates: a European Society on Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis, and International Osteoporosis Foundation Working Group Report", Osteoporos Int, 22, pp.373~390 (2011)
- Wang Z, "Adherence to oral bisphosphonates and the risk of subtrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures among female medicare beneficiaries", Osteoporos Int, 25, pp.2109~2116 (2014)
- Koh JS, "Distribution of atypical fractures and cortical stress lesions in the femur: implications on pathophysiology", Singapore Med J, 52, pp.77~80 (2011)
- Koeppen VA, "Dichotomous location of 160 atypical femoral fractures", Acta Orthop, 84, pp.561~564 (2013)
- Schilcher J, "Atypical fractures are mainly subtrochanteric in Singapore and diaphyseal in Sweden: A cross-sectional study", J Bone Miner Res, 30, pp.2127~2132 (2015)
- Sasaki S, "Low-energy diaphyseal femoral fractures associated with bisphosphonate use and severe curved femur: a case series", J Bone Miner Metab, 30, pp.561~567 (2012)
- Marcano A, "Are race and sex associated with the occurrence of atypical femoral fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 472, pp.1020~1027 (2014)
- Oh Y, "Potential pathogenic mechanism for stress fractures of the bowed femoral shaft in the elderly: Mechanical analysis by the CT-based finite element method", Injury, 45, pp.1764~1771 (2014)
- Hyodo K, "Location of fractures and the characteristics of patients with atypical femoral fractures: analyses of 38 Japanese cases", J Bone Miner Metab, 35, pp.209~214 (2017)
- Kim JW, "Factors affecting fracture location in atypical femoral fractures: a cross-sectional study with 147 patients", Injury, 48, pp.1570~1574 (2017)
- Oh Y, "Location of atypical femoral fracture can be determined by tensile stress distribution influenced by femoral bowing and neck-shaft angle: a CT-based nonlinear finite element analysis model for the assessment of femoral shaft loading stress", Injury, 48, pp.2736~2743 (2017)
- Chen LP, "The correlation between lateral bowing angle of the femur and the location of atypical femur fractures", Calcif Tissue Int, 95, pp.240~247 (2014)
- Soh HH, "Atypical fractures of the femur: effect of anterolateral bowing of the femur on fracture location", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 135, pp.1485~1490 (2015)
- Shane E, "Atypical subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures: second report of a task force of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research", J Bone Miner Res, 29, pp.1~23 (2014)
- Park YC, "Intramedullary nailing for atypical femoral fracture with excessive anterolateral bowing", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 99, pp.726~735 (2017)
- Martelli S, "Femoral shaft strains during daily activities: implications for atypical femoral fractures", Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 29, pp.869~876 (2014)
- Akman A, "Femoral bowing plane adaptation to femoral anteversion", Indian J Orthop, 51, pp.49~54 (2017)
- 임건일, "Pathogenesis, Management and Prevention of Atypical Femoral Fractures", 대한골대사학회지, 22(1), pp.1~8 (2015), 대한골대사학회[DOI]
- Prasarn ML, "Bisphosphonate-associated femur fractures have high complication rates with operative fixation", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 470, pp.2295~2301 (2012)
- van de Laarschot DM, "Screening for atypical femur fractures using extended femur scans by DXA", J Bone Miner Res, 32, pp.1632~1639 (2017)
- McKenna MJ, "Identifying incomplete atypical femoral fractures with single-energy absorptiometry: Declining prevalence", J Endocr Soc, 1, pp.211~220 (2017)