Development and Validation of a New Clinical Diagnostic Screening Model for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background: Age and weight are not only strong predictive parameters for osteoporosis diagnosis but can also be easily acquired from patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a new diagnostic screening model for postmenopausal osteoporosis that uses only 2 parameters, viz., age and weight. The discriminative ability of the model was analyzed and compared with that of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) index. Methods: The age–weight diagnostic screening model was developed using a retrospective chart review of postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years who underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at a tertiary hospital from November 2017 to April 2022. Logistic regression analysis was used to derive a diagnostic screening model for osteoporosis. Results: A total of 533 postmenopausal women were included in the study. According to the highest Youden index value, a probability cut-off value of 0.298 was used in the diagnosis screening model at any site, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 53.8%. For increased sensitivity as a screening tool, a cut-off value of 0.254 was proposed to obtain a sensitivity of 90.2% and a specificity of 42.2%. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves from all screening models were significantly higher than those from the OSTA index model (P<0.05). Conclusions: This study showed the feasibility of a postmenopausal osteoporosis diagnostic screening model that uses 2 strong predictors for osteoporosis diagnosis: age and weight. This age–weight diagnostic model is a simple, effective option in postmenopausal osteoporosis screening.
Abstract
Background: Age and weight are not only strong predictive parameters for osteoporosis diagnosis but can also be easily acquired from patients. This study aimed to develop and validate a new diagnostic screening model for postmenopausal osteoporosis that uses only 2 parameters, viz., age and weight. The discriminative ability of the model was analyzed and compared with that of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) index. Methods: The age–weight diagnostic screening model was developed using a retrospective chart review of postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years who underwent dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at a tertiary hospital from November 2017 to April 2022. Logistic regression analysis was used to derive a diagnostic screening model for osteoporosis. Results: A total of 533 postmenopausal women were included in the study. According to the highest Youden index value, a probability cut-off value of 0.298 was used in the diagnosis screening model at any site, which yielded a sensitivity of 84.3% and a specificity of 53.8%. For increased sensitivity as a screening tool, a cut-off value of 0.254 was proposed to obtain a sensitivity of 90.2% and a specificity of 42.2%. The area under receiver operating characteristic curves from all screening models were significantly higher than those from the OSTA index model (P<0.05). Conclusions: This study showed the feasibility of a postmenopausal osteoporosis diagnostic screening model that uses 2 strong predictors for osteoporosis diagnosis: age and weight. This age–weight diagnostic model is a simple, effective option in postmenopausal osteoporosis screening.
참고문헌 (20)
- Adami G, "Osteoporosis in 10 years time : A glimpse into the future of osteoporosis", Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis, 14 (2022)[DOI]
- Kontis V, "Future life expectancy in 35 industrialised countries : projections with a Bayesian model ensemble", Lancet, 389, pp.1323~1335 (2017)[DOI]
- Crandall CJ, "Risk assessment tools for osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women : A systematic review", Curr Osteoporos Rep, 13, pp.287~301 (2015)[DOI]
- Subramaniam S, "Performance of osteoporosis self-assessment tool(OST)in predicting osteoporosis-a review", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 15, pp.1445~ (2018)[DOI]
- Koh LK, "A simple tool to identify asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis", Osteoporos Int, 12, pp.699~705 (2001)[DOI]
- Soontrapa S, "Using quantitative ultrasound and OSTA index to increase the efficacy and decrease the cost for diagnosis of osteoporosis", J Med Assoc Thai, 92(Suppl5), pp.S49~S53 (2009)
- Zha XY, "Diagnostic value of osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians(OSTA)and quantitative bone ultrasound(QUS)in detecting high-risk populations for osteoporosis among elderly Chinese men", J Bone Miner Metab, 33, pp.230~238 (2015)[DOI]
- Pérez-Castrillón JL, "OST risk index and calcaneus bone densitometry in osteoporosis diagnosis", J Clin Densitom, 10, pp.404~407 (2007)[DOI]
- Cruz AS, "Artificial intelligence on the identification of risk groups for osteoporosis, a general review", Biomed Eng Online, 17, pp.12~ (2018)[DOI]
- Ho-Pham LT, "Development of a model for identification of individuals with high risk of osteoporosis", Arch Osteoporos, 15, pp.111~ (2020)[DOI]
- Martin Mayer, "Concerns about Race and Ethnicity within the United States Fracture Risk Assessment Tool", 대한골대사학회지, 29(2), pp.141~144 (2022), 대한골대사학회
- Leeyaphan J, "The association between bone mineral density and complete blood count in postmenopausal women : A cross-sectional study", J Med Assoc Thai, 104, pp.432~437 (2021)[DOI]
- Riley RD, "Calculating the sample size required for developing a clinical prediction model", BMJ, 368, pp.m441~ (2020)[DOI]
- Geater S, "Validation of the OSTA index for discriminating between high and low probability of femoral neck and lumbar spine osteoporosis among Thai postmenopausal women", J Med Assoc Thai, 87, pp.1286~1292 (2004)
- Chaovisitsaree S, "Comparison of osteoporosis self assessment tool for Asian (OSTA) and standard assessment in Menopause Clinic, Chiang Mai", J Med Assoc Thai, 90, pp.420~425 (2007)
- Limpaphayom KK, "Prevalence of osteopenia and osteoporosis in Thai women", Menopause, 8, pp.65~69 (2001)[DOI]
- Schneider DL, "Clinical utility of spine bone density in elderly women", J Clin Densitom, 9, pp.255~260 (2006)[DOI]
- Green AD, "Does this woman have osteoporosis?", JAMA, 292, pp.2890~2900 (2004)[DOI]
- Nayak S, "Systematic review and meta-analysis of the performance of clinical risk assessment instruments for screening for osteoporosis or low bone density", Osteoporos Int, 26, pp.1543~1554 (2015)[DOI]
- Choi HG, "Weight change is associated with osteoporosis : A cross sectional study using the Korean community health survey", Int J Environ Res Public Health, 18, pp.13368~ (2021)[DOI]