본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Denosumab in Osteoporosis: Predicting Long-Term Efficacy beyond 10 Years

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정형외과학

초록

Osteoporosis, characterized by diminished bone density and microarchitectural deterioration, has become a global health concern and can lead to increased fracture susceptibility and subsequent morbidity and mortality.[1] The goal of treating postmenopausal osteoporosis is to increase bone density and prevent fractures, and various medications have been developed to achieve these goals.[2,3] Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), has emerged as a key therapeutic tool for osteoporosis management.[4] Denosumab is a RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation inhibitor that strongly inhibits bone resorption, thereby reducing bone loss and lowering fracture incidence, making it a potent treatment for patients at high risk of fractures.[4,5] Many clinical trials and real-world studies have demonstrated denosumab’s efficacy in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and mitigating fracture risk.[5,6] Therefore, denosumab is widely accepted by clinicians as an important treatment for osteoporosis management, as reflected in clinical guidelines.[2,7-11] Long-term studies of up to 10 years have demonstrated the continued effectiveness of denosumab in increasing bone density and preventing fractures.[5,12] Moreover, continuing treatment beyond the initial years confers further fracture risk mitigation, highlighting denosumab's sustained efficacy over prolonged durations.[5] Notably, a 10-year denosumab treatment yielded a substantial increase in spine (21.7%) and hip BMD (9.2%).[5] Denosumab’s potent inhibitory effect on bone resorption effectively reduces fracture risk and increases the likelihood of reaching target BMD compared to bisphosphonates.[13] Therefore, once fracture risk has been reduced to moderate after a period of denosumab treatment, the drug can be discontinued in favor of sequential treatment with bisphosphonates.[2] However, in some clinical situations, once denosumab treatment has been initiated, it may need to be continued. Some patients who have reached their goals wish to continue denosumab treatment because of high adherence, dosing convenience, and fewer side effects. [14] In patients who remain at high risk of fracture after 10 years of treatment, continued treatment should be considered.[7] Denosumab discontinuation results in a rebound phenomenon and should be followed by an agent such as bisphosphonate. [15,16] However, in patients with advanced renal dysfunction, sequential therapy with bisphosphonates is not feasible, and there are difficult clinical situations where, once denosumab is administered, long-term therapy should be considered. Denosumab was first administered to patients in South Korea in November 2016. Some patients will require longterm denosumab treatment (>10 years). However, there are currently no reports on the effect of denosumab treatment on BMD after a 10-year administration. Therefore, we used a statistical approach to predict the changes in BMD after 10 years of denosumab treatment. In this study, we analyzed the results of the original Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) extension study and clinical studies to make statistical projections of the effects of denosumab treatment after 10 years. Utilizing multiscale indirect response models based on pharmacological studies is an appropriate approach to understanding the integrated dynamic impact of denosumab on longitudinal changes in BMD. [17-19] We utilized the following two methods as predictive models.

Abstract

Osteoporosis, characterized by diminished bone density and microarchitectural deterioration, has become a global health concern and can lead to increased fracture susceptibility and subsequent morbidity and mortality.[1] The goal of treating postmenopausal osteoporosis is to increase bone density and prevent fractures, and various medications have been developed to achieve these goals.[2,3] Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand (RANKL), has emerged as a key therapeutic tool for osteoporosis management.[4] Denosumab is a RANKL-mediated osteoclast differentiation inhibitor that strongly inhibits bone resorption, thereby reducing bone loss and lowering fracture incidence, making it a potent treatment for patients at high risk of fractures.[4,5] Many clinical trials and real-world studies have demonstrated denosumab’s efficacy in improving bone mineral density (BMD) and mitigating fracture risk.[5,6] Therefore, denosumab is widely accepted by clinicians as an important treatment for osteoporosis management, as reflected in clinical guidelines.[2,7-11] Long-term studies of up to 10 years have demonstrated the continued effectiveness of denosumab in increasing bone density and preventing fractures.[5,12] Moreover, continuing treatment beyond the initial years confers further fracture risk mitigation, highlighting denosumab's sustained efficacy over prolonged durations.[5] Notably, a 10-year denosumab treatment yielded a substantial increase in spine (21.7%) and hip BMD (9.2%).[5] Denosumab’s potent inhibitory effect on bone resorption effectively reduces fracture risk and increases the likelihood of reaching target BMD compared to bisphosphonates.[13] Therefore, once fracture risk has been reduced to moderate after a period of denosumab treatment, the drug can be discontinued in favor of sequential treatment with bisphosphonates.[2] However, in some clinical situations, once denosumab treatment has been initiated, it may need to be continued. Some patients who have reached their goals wish to continue denosumab treatment because of high adherence, dosing convenience, and fewer side effects. [14] In patients who remain at high risk of fracture after 10 years of treatment, continued treatment should be considered.[7] Denosumab discontinuation results in a rebound phenomenon and should be followed by an agent such as bisphosphonate. [15,16] However, in patients with advanced renal dysfunction, sequential therapy with bisphosphonates is not feasible, and there are difficult clinical situations where, once denosumab is administered, long-term therapy should be considered. Denosumab was first administered to patients in South Korea in November 2016. Some patients will require longterm denosumab treatment (>10 years). However, there are currently no reports on the effect of denosumab treatment on BMD after a 10-year administration. Therefore, we used a statistical approach to predict the changes in BMD after 10 years of denosumab treatment. In this study, we analyzed the results of the original Fracture Reduction Evaluation of Denosumab in Osteoporosis Every 6 Months (FREEDOM) extension study and clinical studies to make statistical projections of the effects of denosumab treatment after 10 years. Utilizing multiscale indirect response models based on pharmacological studies is an appropriate approach to understanding the integrated dynamic impact of denosumab on longitudinal changes in BMD. [17-19] We utilized the following two methods as predictive models.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Bliuc D, "Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density : the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study", J Bone Miner Res, 30, pp.637~646 (2015)[DOI]
  2. Park SY, "Position statement : postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment strategies in Korea", J Bone Metab, 30, pp.289~295 (2023)[DOI]
  3. Eastell R, "Treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis", N Engl J Med, 338, pp.736~746 (1998)[DOI]
  4. Brown JP, "Long-term treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis", Endocrinol Metab(Seoul), 36, pp.544~552 (2021)[DOI]
  5. Bone HG, "10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis : results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension", Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol, 5, pp.513~523 (2017)[DOI]
  6. Rhee Y, "Real-world safety and effectiveness of denosumab in patients with osteoporosis : a prospective, observational study in South Korea", Endocrinol Metab(Seoul), 37, pp.497~505 (2022)[DOI]
  7. Eastell R, "Pharmacological management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women : an endocrine society* clinical practice guideline", J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 104, pp.1595~1622 (2019)[DOI]
  8. Camacho PM, "American association of clinical endocrinologists", american college of endocrinology clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis-2020 update, 2020, pp.26, 1~46
  9. Gregson CL, "UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis", Arch Osteoporos, 17, pp.58~ (2022)[DOI]
  10. Tai TW, "Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in Taiwan : 2022 update", J Formos Med Assoc, 122(Suppl 1), pp.S4~s13 (2023)[DOI]
  11. Qaseem A, "Pharmacologic treatment of primary osteoporosis or low bone mass to prevent fractures in adults : a living clinical guideline from the American College of Physicians", Ann Intern Med, 176, pp.224~238 (2023)[DOI]
  12. Kendler DL, "Denosumab in the treatment of osteoporosis : 10 years later : a narrative review", Adv Ther, 39, pp.58~74 (2022)[DOI]
  13. Hattori K, "Predictive factors for achievement of treatment goals in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with denosumab", Mod Rheumatol, 33, pp.217~223 (2023)[DOI]
  14. Freemantle N, "Final results of the DAPS(Denosumab Adherence Preference Satisfaction)study : a 24-month, randomized, crossover comparison with alendronate in postmenopausal women", Osteoporos Int, 23, pp.317~326 (2012)[DOI]
  15. Tsourdi E, "Fracture risk and management of discontinuation of denosumab therapy : a systematic review and position statement by ECTS", J Clin Endocrinol Metab (2020)[DOI]
  16. Tay WL, "Discontinuing denosumab: can it be done safely? a review of the literature", Endocrinol Metab (Seoul), 37, pp.183~194 (2022)[DOI]
  17. Peterson MC, "Predicting nonlinear changes in bone mineral density over time using a multiscale systems pharmacology model", CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 1, pp.e14~ (2012)[DOI]
  18. Hasegawa C, "Automated scale reduction of nonlinear qsp models with an illustrative application to a bone biology system", CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol, 7, pp.562~572 (2018)[DOI]
  19. Tsoularis A, "Analysis of logistic growth models", Math Biosci, 179, pp.21~55 (2002)[DOI]
  20. Cummings SR, "Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.756~765 (2009)[DOI]
  21. Hambli R, "Prediction of denosumab effects on bone remodeling : a combined pharmacokinetics and finite element modeling", J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 60, pp.492~504 (2016)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)