미국 의학교육기관의 학생연구 프로그램
Student Research Programs in U.S. Medical Schools and Institutions
4
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The majority of medical educators agree that scientific education is critical to the development of physician-scientists. However, the proportion of physicians interested or engaged in research has been decreasing. To overcome this deficit of research oriented physicians, many medical schools in the United States have introduced scholarly concentration (SC) programs into their medical curricula since 2000. In contrast, Korea has very few medical schools with such programs. Research programs at American medical schools were surveyed and investigated in order to better design and develop SC programs appropriate for Korean medical schools. Information on SC programs was gathered by reviewing medical school web sites and related articles. The SC programs of Brown Alpert Medical School, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, and Stanford University School of Medicine are discussed in depth. The characteristics of each program were organized into seven parts: program description, administrative structure, orientation, curricular content, mentors and mentoring, student evaluation, and challenges. For a successful SC program in Korea we must consider providing guaranteed time for SC programs with necessary modifications in the core medical curriculum, educating and training of mentors, providing orientation and motivating students to pursue research, developing curricula for SC programs, and evaluating the progress of SC projects.
Abstract
The majority of medical educators agree that scientific education is critical to the development of physician-scientists. However, the proportion of physicians interested or engaged in research has been decreasing. To overcome this deficit of research oriented physicians, many medical schools in the United States have introduced scholarly concentration (SC) programs into their medical curricula since 2000. In contrast, Korea has very few medical schools with such programs. Research programs at American medical schools were surveyed and investigated in order to better design and develop SC programs appropriate for Korean medical schools. Information on SC programs was gathered by reviewing medical school web sites and related articles. The SC programs of Brown Alpert Medical School, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, and Stanford University School of Medicine are discussed in depth. The characteristics of each program were organized into seven parts: program description, administrative structure, orientation, curricular content, mentors and mentoring, student evaluation, and challenges. For a successful SC program in Korea we must consider providing guaranteed time for SC programs with necessary modifications in the core medical curriculum, educating and training of mentors, providing orientation and motivating students to pursue research, developing curricula for SC programs, and evaluating the progress of SC projects.
참고문헌 (19)
- Bickel, J., "Research opportunities for medical students : An approach to the physician-investigator shortage", J Med Educ, 55(7), pp.567~573 (1980)
- Boninger, M., "Implementation of a longitudinal mentored scholarly project : An approach at two medical schools", Acad Med, 85(3), pp.429~437 (2010)
- "Scholarly concentration program of Brown Alpert Medical School" (2015)[URL]
- Dekker, F. W., "Science education in medical curriculum: Teaching science or training scientists", Med Sci Educ, 21(3S), pp.258~260 (2011)
- "Study program of Duke University School of Medicine" (2015)[URL]
- Green, E. P., "Encouraging scholarship : Medical school programs to promote student inquiry beyond the traditional medical curriculum", Acad Med, 85(3), pp.409~418 (2010)
- Jacobs, C. D., "The value of medical student research : The experience at Stanford University School of Medicine", Med Educ, 29(5), pp.342~346 (1995)
- Laskowitz, D. T., "Engaging students in dedicated research and scholarship during medical school : The long-term experiences at Duke and Stanford", Acad Med, 85(3), pp.419~428 (2010)
- Lawson McLean, A., "Twelve tips for teachers to encourage student engagement in academic medicine", Med Teach, 35(7), pp.549~554 (2013)
- Lloyd, T., "Factors that influence doctors’participation in clinical research", Med Educ, 38(8), pp.848~851 (2004)
- Mabvuure, N. T., "Twelve tips for introducing students to research and publishing : A medical student’s perspective", Med Teach, 34(9), pp.705~709 (2012)
- O’Connor Grochowski, C., "A curricular model for the training of physician scientists : The evolution of the Duke University School of Medicine curriculum", Acad Med, 82(4), pp.375~382 (2007)
- "Scholarly Concentrations Collaborative" (2015)[URL]
- Schor, N. F., "The scholarly project initiative : Introducing scholarship in medicine through a longitudinal, mentored curricular program", Acad Med, 80(9), pp.824~831 (2005)
- Silcox, L. C., "Residents’ and program directors’ attitudes toward research during anesthesiology training : A Canadian perspective", Anesth Analg, 102(3), pp.859~864 (2006)
- Solomon, S. S., "Impact of medical student research in the development of physician-scientists", J Investig Med, 51(3), pp.149~156 (2003)
- "Scholarly concentration of Stanford University School of Medicine" (2015)[URL]
- "Scholarly project program of University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine" (2015)[URL]
- Zemlo, T. R., "The physician-scientist : Career issues and challenges at the year 2000", FASEB J, 14(2), pp.221~230 (2000)