동명사와 부정사의 이해 정도에 관한 연구
A Study of Understanding Degree on Gerund and Infinitive
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this paper is to observe and analyze the understanding degree between gerund and infinitive. There are many differences between gerund and infinitive basically. Many linguists present the differences between them. First, gerund means the past action & infinitive means the future action. Second, gerund represents the general statement and infinitive represents the special statement. Third, gerund means the theoretical statement and infinitive means factual statement. Fourth, gerund stands for progressive action and infinitive stands for repeated action. Many students can distinguish their basic forms and usages but they don’t know the usage of infinitive well. Although their forms are simple, many students don’t understand the usage of infinitive clearly. The usages of infinitive are not easy to them. So, many teachers have to teach the usages as well as the form well. As a consequence, this paper shows that gerund means realized action of the past experience and infinitive means hypothetical and future oriented action. Many people have to know and use the correct forms and usages exactly.
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to observe and analyze the understanding degree between gerund and infinitive. There are many differences between gerund and infinitive basically. Many linguists present the differences between them. First, gerund means the past action & infinitive means the future action. Second, gerund represents the general statement and infinitive represents the special statement. Third, gerund means the theoretical statement and infinitive means factual statement. Fourth, gerund stands for progressive action and infinitive stands for repeated action. Many students can distinguish their basic forms and usages but they don’t know the usage of infinitive well. Although their forms are simple, many students don’t understand the usage of infinitive clearly. The usages of infinitive are not easy to them. So, many teachers have to teach the usages as well as the form well. As a consequence, this paper shows that gerund means realized action of the past experience and infinitive means hypothetical and future oriented action. Many people have to know and use the correct forms and usages exactly.
참고문헌 (21)
- 고경환, "의사소통을 위한 영어동사문법" (2009), 제주대학교출판부
- 권경원, "동명사와 부정사에 관한 의미론적 연구", 영어영문학연구, 35 (1993)
- 권경원, "동명사와 부정사에 대한 연구", 영어영문학연구, 34(3), pp.203~221 (2008), 대한영어영문학회
- 김건옥, "우리 논리로 이해하는 영어시제" (2008), 교문사
- 문 용, "高級英文法解說" (2008), 박영사
- Akmajian, Adrian, "An Introduction to the Principles of Transformational Syntax" (1975), MIT Press
- Alexander, L. G, "Longman English Grammar" (1996), Longman
- Bolinger, Dwight, "Meaning and Form" (1977), Longman
- Chuquet, Jean, "To et l'infinitif anglas" (1986), Orphrys
- Curm, George, O, "Syntax" (1931), D. C. Heath and Company
- Curm, George, O, "English Grammar" (1966), Barnes & Noble Inc
- Decleck, Renaaat, "A Comprehensive Descriptive Grammar of English" (1991), Kaitakusha
- Dixon, R. M. W, "A Semantic Approach to English Grammar" (2005), Oxford University Press
- Duffley, Patrick J, "The Gerund and The to infinitive as subject", Journal of English Linguistics, 31(4), pp.324~352 (2003)
- Hamawand, Zeki, "Determinants of Complement Clause Variation in English", English Studies, 85(5), pp.451~464 (2004)
- Huddleston, Rodney D, "A Student’s Introduction to English Grammar" (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Jespersen, O, "Essentials of English Grammar" (1956), George & Unwin Ltd
- Pickett, Joseph P, "The American Heritage Guide to Contempory Usage and Style" (2005), Houghton Mifflin Company
- Quirk, R, "A Grammar of Contemporary English" (1972), Seminar Press
- Quirk, R, "A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language" (1985), Longman
- Thomson, A. J, "A Practical English Grammar" (1986), Oxford University Press