근거기반설계 연구의 근거 특성과 의료건축의 근거기반실무를 위한 시사점 - HERD의 연구경향 분석을 중심으로
The Characteristics of Evidence in Evidence-based Design Research and Their Implications to the Evidence-based Practice of Healthcare Architecture - Focused on Health Environments Research & Design Journal
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To prove the credibility of EBD, it is necessary to define concepts regarding the nature of credible knowledge and the hierarchy of evidence. In addition, the relationship between EBD and EBP needs to be addressed through a practical viewpoint. Methods: The systematic review is applied to define the nature of knowledge and the characteristics of research papers in architectural EBD while analyzing the field of study, knowledge focus and types of keywords of the first author. Results: As a whole, the types of research focus evaluated using the most frequent keywords include function(40.86%), specialized knowledge(30.52%), professional practice(21.37%), and health(5.78%). Empirical research(83.72%) is more likely to be found than theoretical research(13.95%). The EBD research papers ranked as top-tier are only 7(2.03%) among a total of 344, while the research papers ranked in the third to fourth tiers are 276(80.23%). Implications: There is a deficiency of reliable 1-2 tier research papers. From a practical viewpoint, it would be realistic to recommend that healthcare architects appropriately evaluate the quality of EBD research and apply it in practice, rather than to conduct EBD research themselves. This systematic review illustrates the nature of EBD research.
Abstract
Purpose: To prove the credibility of EBD, it is necessary to define concepts regarding the nature of credible knowledge and the hierarchy of evidence. In addition, the relationship between EBD and EBP needs to be addressed through a practical viewpoint. Methods: The systematic review is applied to define the nature of knowledge and the characteristics of research papers in architectural EBD while analyzing the field of study, knowledge focus and types of keywords of the first author. Results: As a whole, the types of research focus evaluated using the most frequent keywords include function(40.86%), specialized knowledge(30.52%), professional practice(21.37%), and health(5.78%). Empirical research(83.72%) is more likely to be found than theoretical research(13.95%). The EBD research papers ranked as top-tier are only 7(2.03%) among a total of 344, while the research papers ranked in the third to fourth tiers are 276(80.23%). Implications: There is a deficiency of reliable 1-2 tier research papers. From a practical viewpoint, it would be realistic to recommend that healthcare architects appropriately evaluate the quality of EBD research and apply it in practice, rather than to conduct EBD research themselves. This systematic review illustrates the nature of EBD research.
참고문헌 (29)
- Balshem, H., "GRADE Guidelines: 3. Rating the Quality of Evidence", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 64, pp.401~406 (2011)
- Bosch, S., "Outside the Ivory Tower: The Role of Healthcare Design Researchers in Practice", Journal of Interior Design, 36(2), pp.5~12 (2011)
- Burke, LM, "Methodologies for Investigating Performance Changes with Supplement Use", International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 28(2), pp.151~169 (2018)
- "CHD" (2008)[URL]
- Daly, J, "A Hierarchy of Evidence for Assessing Qualitative Health Research", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60, pp.46~ (2007)
- Davidson, JE, "Organizing the Evidence for Healthcare Design Projects", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(2), pp.13~22 (2017)
- Delvin, AS, "Health Care Environments and Patient Outcomes: A Review of the Literature", Environment and Behavior, 35, pp.665~694 (2003)
- Doherty, S., "History of Evidence-Based Medicine. Oranges, Chloride of Lime and Leeches: Barriers to Teaching Old Dogs New Tricks", Emergency Medicine Australasia, 17, pp.314~321 (2005)
- Guyatt, GH, "GRADE: An Emerging Consensus on Rating Quality of Evidence and Strength of Recommendations", BMJ: British Medical Journal, 336(7650), pp.924~926 (2008)
- Halliday, TC, "Knowledge Mandates: Collective Influence by Scientific, Normative and Syncretic Professions", The British Journal of Sociology, 36(3), pp.421~447 (1985)
- Hamilton, DK, "The Four Levels of Evidence Based Practice", Healthcare Design, 3(4), pp.18~26 (2003)
- Hamilton, DK, "What Constitutes Best Practice in Healthcare Design?", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(2), pp.121~126 (2011)
- Hamilton, DK, "Evidenced-Based Practice: Four Levels Revisited", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 13(3), pp.26~29 (2020)
- Harris, DD, "The Role of Flooring as a Design Element Affecting Patient and Healthcare Worker Safety", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(3), pp.98~ (2013)
- Ingham-Broomfield, R., "A Nurses’ Guide to the Hierarchy of Research Designs and Evidence", Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing, 33(3), pp.38~43 (2016)
- Mithun Pai, BH, "Research Design Hierarchy: Strength of Evidence in Evidence-Based Dentistry", Journal of Interdisciplinary Dentistry, 2(3), pp.158~163 (2012)
- Pati, D., "A Framework for Evaluating Evidence in Evidence-Based Design", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 4(3), pp.50~71 (2011)
- Peavey, E., "Evidence-Based Design and Research-Informed Design: What’s the Differences? Conceptual Definitions and Comparative Analysis", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 10(5), pp.143~156 (2017)
- Ranganathan, P., "Study designs: Part 1 – Anoverview and classification", Perspectives in Clinical Research, 9(4), pp.184~186 (2018)
- Rashid, M., "The Question of Knowledge in Evidence-Based Design for Healthcare Facilities: Limitations and Suggestions", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 6(4), pp.101~126 (2013)
- Rashid, M., "A review of the empirical literature on the relationships between indoor environment and stress in health care and office settings: Problems and prospects of sharing evidence", Environment and Behavior, 40(2), pp.151~190 (2008)
- Satterfield, JM, "Toward a Transdisciplinary Model of Evidence-Based Practice", The Milbank Quarterly, 87(2), pp.368~390 (2009)
- "What Is Hierarchy of Evidence" (2015)[URL]
- Stankos, M., "Evidence-Based Design in Healthcare: A Theoretical Dilemma", Interdisciplinary Design and Research e-Journal, 1(1), pp.1~15 (2007)
- Stetler, C., "Evidence-Based Practice and the Use of Research: A Synopsis of Basic Concepts & Strategies to Improve Care" (2002), NOVA Foundation
- Stichler, JF, "Weighing the Evidence", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 3(4), pp.3~7 (2010)
- Stichler, JF, "Applying Different Processes for Evidence-Based Design", Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 7(1), pp.8~13 (2013)
- Ulrich, RS, "A review of the research literature on evidence-based health-care design", Health Environment Research and Design, 1(3), pp.61~125 (2008)
- Zengul, FD, "A Review of Evidence Based Design in Healthcare from Resource-Based Perspective", Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14(2), pp.19~36 (2013)