Post-ArabSpring 시기 중동 패권 분쟁과 평화: 패권안정론에 대한 비판적 시각
Middle Eastern Area in Post-ArabSpring Era: Critical View on Hegemonic Stability
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
considerably, some neo-realist scholars emphasized the necessity of maintaining the supremacy of the United States, and they created the hegemonic stability theory. Therefore, the hegemonic stability theory is an expression of Americanism, a kind of American centrism. However, structuralist scholars and liberal scholars have criticized the hegemonic stability theory. The hegemonic stability theory has been criticized because of the ambiguity of the ‘hegemony’ concept, the problems of the theoretical composition of this theory, ideological bias, and neglecting the connectivity between domestic class-social structure–state within each nation-state and international relations. This article is based on the question of whether the hegemonic stability theory that ‘the existence of hegemon stabilizes the system’ properly explains the instability factors in the Middle East area in the era of Post-ArabSpring. This paper also emphasizes that the competition of hegemony of the three major actors in the Middle East - the United States, which is recognized as a hegemonic state in the Middle East, Shiite central state, Iran which is judged to seeks hegemony in the Middle East, and the Sunni group IS, which has pursued supremacy beyond the Middle East - is an instability factor of the Middle East international order.
Abstract
considerably, some neo-realist scholars emphasized the necessity of maintaining the supremacy of the United States, and they created the hegemonic stability theory. Therefore, the hegemonic stability theory is an expression of Americanism, a kind of American centrism. However, structuralist scholars and liberal scholars have criticized the hegemonic stability theory. The hegemonic stability theory has been criticized because of the ambiguity of the ‘hegemony’ concept, the problems of the theoretical composition of this theory, ideological bias, and neglecting the connectivity between domestic class-social structure–state within each nation-state and international relations. This article is based on the question of whether the hegemonic stability theory that ‘the existence of hegemon stabilizes the system’ properly explains the instability factors in the Middle East area in the era of Post-ArabSpring. This paper also emphasizes that the competition of hegemony of the three major actors in the Middle East - the United States, which is recognized as a hegemonic state in the Middle East, Shiite central state, Iran which is judged to seeks hegemony in the Middle East, and the Sunni group IS, which has pursued supremacy beyond the Middle East - is an instability factor of the Middle East international order.
참고문헌 (68)
- 김관옥, "트럼프행정부의 '미국우선주의' 대외정책", 국제정치연구, 20(1), pp.77~98 (2017), 동아시아국제정치학회[DOI]
- 백창재, "패권과 국제정치경제질서: 패권안정론의 비판과 평가", 국제.지역연구, 12(1), pp.1~20 (2003), 국제학연구소
- 이효영, "‘미국우선주의’(America First) 통상정책의 국제통상질서에 대한 함의", 국제법평론회 춘계학술대회 발표문 (2017)
- 정상률, "JCPOA 이후 중동 국제관계 변화 전망", 중동문제연구, 16(1), pp.1~41 (2017), 중동문제연구소
- 정상률, "America First와 Dar al-Islam 간 중동 패권 경쟁과 중동평화", 한국중동학회논총, 39(3), pp.25~48 (2019), 한국중동학회[DOI]
- 트럼프 대통령의 2019 국정연설과 중동정책 평가 및 전망, "정상률", KIEP EMERiCs, ~ (2019)
- Wallerstein, Immanuel M., "세계체제론" (1985), 나남
- Avery, William P., "America in a Changing World Political Economy" (1982), Longman
- Baldwin., "Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies", Fourth Annual Conference of the British International Studies Association, University of Durham (1977)
- Baldwin, David, "Power Analysis and World Politics: New Trends versus Old Tendencies", World Politics, 31(2) (1979)
- Baldwin, David, "Power and International Relations: A Conceptual Approach" (2016), Princeton University Press
- Cline, Say S., "World Power Assessment" (1977), Westview Press
- Cardoso, Fernando Henrique, "Dependency and Development in Latin America" (1979), California University Press
- Cordon, W. Marx., "American Decline and the End of Hegemony", SAIS Review, (2) (1990)
- Cox, Robert W., "Social Forces, States, and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory", Millennium – Journal of International Studies, 10(2) (1981)
- Cox, Robert W., "Production, Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of History" (1987), Columbia University Press
- Dahl, Robert A, "The Concept of Power", Behavioral Science, 2(3) (1957)
- Dahl, Robert A., "Who governs? Democracy and Power in an America City" (1961), Yale University Press
- Dahl, Robert A., "International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, XII", pp.405~405 (1968), Free Press
- Doran, Charles F., "The Politics of Assimilation: Hegemony and Its Aftermath" (1979), Johns Hopkins University Press
- Feld, Werner J., "International Relations: A Transnational Approach" (1978), Alfred
- Gill, Stephen., "Review: Two Concepts of International Political Economy", Review of International Studies, 16(4) (1990)
- Robert W. Cox, "Production Power and World Order: Social Forces in the Making of Histor", ~
- Goldstein, Joshuna S., "Long Cycles ; Prosperity and War in the Modern Age" (1988), Yale University Press
- Gilpin, Robert., "War and Change in World Politics" (1981), Cambridge University Press
- Gilpin, Robert., "The Political Economy of International Relations" (1987), Princeton University Press
- Gilpin, Robert., "Global Political Economy: Understanding the International Economic Order" (2001), Princeton University Press
- Grunberg, Isabelle., "Exploring the 'Myth' of Hegemonic Stability", International Organization, 44(4) (1990)
- Gulick, Edward V., "Europe's Classical Balance of Power" (1955), W.W.Norton
- Hunt, Michael H., "American Decline and the Great Devate:A Historical Perspective", SAIS Review, (2) (1990)
- Huntington, Samuel., "Transnational Organization in World Politics", World Politics, XXV(3) (1973)
- Huntington, Samuel, "The U.S Decline or Renewal?", Foreign Affairs, 67(2) (1988)
- Inoguchi, Kuniko., "An Emerging Post-Hegemonic System: Choice for Japan" (1987), Chikuma Shobo
- Inoguchi, Takashi, "The Legacy of Weather Cock Prime Minister", Japan Quarterly, 34(4) (1987)
- Jacobson, Harold K., "Networks of Interdependence: International Organizations and the Global Political System" (1979), Alfred A.Knopf.Inc
- Kaiser, Karl., "Transnational Politics: Toward a Theory of Multinational Politics", International Organization, XXV(3) (1971)
- The Changing Currency of Power: The Future Nature of U.S Influence in Western Europe and North-East Asia, "Kelleher, Catherine M.", Adelphi, ~, pp.Adelphi Papers 256 (1990)
- Keohane, Robert O., "Power and Interdependence : World Politics in Transition" (1977), Little,Brown and Co
- Keohane, Robert O., "After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy" (1984), Princeton University Press
- Knorr, Claus., "The Power of Nations" (1975), Basic Books
- March, James., "Varieties of Political Theory" (1966), Prentice Hall
- Mandelbaum, Michael, "Ending the Cold War", Foreign Affairs(Essay), (Spring) (1989)
- Michalak, Stanely J, "Theoretical Perspectives for Understanding International Interdependence", World Politics, ΧΧΧII(1) (1979)
- Modelski, George., "The Long Cycle of Global Politics and Nation-State", Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20(2) (1978)
- Morgenthau, Hans J., "Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace" (1972), Alfred․ A․ Knoff
- North, Robert C., "Power Transition and Hegemonic Succession", paper delivered at the meeting of the International Studies Association (1986)
- Nye, Joseph S., "The Changing Nature of World Power", Political Science Quarterly, 105(2) (1990)
- Nye, Joseph S., "Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power" (1990), Basic Books
- Nye, Joseph S., "Bound to Lead: The Changing Nature of American Power" (1991), Basic Books
- Rosecrance, Richard N., "The Rise of the Trading State" (1986), Basic Book
- Rosecrance, Richard N., "Whither Interdependence?", International Organizations, 29(4) (1975)
- Rosecrance, Richard, "Interdepence: Myth or Reality", World Politics, XXVI(1) (1973)
- Rosenau, James N., "The Study of Global Interdependence: Essays on the Transnationalization of World Affairs" (1980), London Nichols Publishing Company
- Russett, Bruce M., "The Mysterious Case of Vanishing Hegemony: Or is Mark Twain Really Dead?", International Organization, 39(2) (1985)
- Simon, Hebert., "Models of Man" (1957), John Wiley
- Strange, Susan., "The Persistent Myth of Lost Hegemony", International Organization, 41 (1987)
- Strange, Susan., "States and Markets" (1988), Basil Blackwell
- Szymanski, Albert, "Military Spending and Economic Stagnation", American Journal of Sociology, 1 (1973)
- Taylor,A.J.P., "The Struggle for Master in Europe,1848~1918" (1954), Oxford University Press
- Tollison, Robert D., "International Integration and the Interdependence of Economic Variables", International Organization, 27 (1973)
- Vogel, Ezra., "Japan as Number One" (1979), Harvard University Press
- Wagner, R. Harrison., "Economic Interdependence, Bargaining Power and Political Influence", International Organization, 41 (1988)
- Wallerstein, Immanuel M., "The Modern World System II: Merchantilism and the Consolidation of European World Economy" (1980), Academic
- Wallerstein, Immanuel M., "The Politics of the World Economy: The States, the Movements, and the Civilizations" (1984), Cambridge University Press
- Waltz, Kenneth N., "Theory of International Politics" (1979), Reading
- Waltz, Kenneth N., "Realist Thought and Neo-realist Theory", Journal of International Affairs, 44(1) (1990)
- Worlforth, William., "The Stability of a Unipolar World", International Security, 24(1) (1999)
- Young, Oran, "Interdependencies in World Politics", International Journal, 24