『애프터 다크(アフターダーク)』에 나타난 양면성현대사회와 인간 내면에 잠재된 중층성 고찰
The double-sidedness in “After Dark” Consideration of the diversity lurking inside modern society and the human
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study shows the double-sidedness of Mari and Takahashi in “After Dark”, with a persecution complex, harmful behavior, problems implied by harmful behavior and the meaning of different endings. Due to her inferiority to her sister, Mari is caught up in a victim mentality even h after she becomes an adult. She makes a hobby of torturing herself. Takahashi cannot recover his relationship with his parents because of his grudge against his father. These two people are obsessed with the victim mentality and take the attitude of a bystander who turns away from Eri's “silent cry” represented by others. However, they recognize their problems through the process of knowing each other. However, they arrive at different endings. She returns home and feels guilty to Eri and tears, but Takahashi still wanders around the dark streets. In other words, the figure of Mari ,who recognized her harmful behavior, shows the possibility of communication with the other, but the figure of Takahashi, who does not, passes the message that the problem will appear again in another form unless the problem is solved. The double-sidedness and the two different conclusions can be seen as a setting that Haruki Murakami intended to objectively show the reality in order to “provide readers with the multiple possibilities”. In other words, he wanted to depict the ambiguous meaning inherent in the human and society that he felt after the incident of Aum Shinrikyo.
Abstract
This study shows the double-sidedness of Mari and Takahashi in “After Dark”, with a persecution complex, harmful behavior, problems implied by harmful behavior and the meaning of different endings. Due to her inferiority to her sister, Mari is caught up in a victim mentality even h after she becomes an adult. She makes a hobby of torturing herself. Takahashi cannot recover his relationship with his parents because of his grudge against his father. These two people are obsessed with the victim mentality and take the attitude of a bystander who turns away from Eri's “silent cry” represented by others. However, they recognize their problems through the process of knowing each other. However, they arrive at different endings. She returns home and feels guilty to Eri and tears, but Takahashi still wanders around the dark streets. In other words, the figure of Mari ,who recognized her harmful behavior, shows the possibility of communication with the other, but the figure of Takahashi, who does not, passes the message that the problem will appear again in another form unless the problem is solved. The double-sidedness and the two different conclusions can be seen as a setting that Haruki Murakami intended to objectively show the reality in order to “provide readers with the multiple possibilities”. In other words, he wanted to depict the ambiguous meaning inherent in the human and society that he felt after the incident of Aum Shinrikyo.
참고문헌 (11)
- 권택영, "현대 문명의 이면에 가려진 몸의 실존적 의미, 어둠의 저편", pp.280~297 (2005), 문학사
- 渥美孝子, "村上春樹『アフターダーク』の居場所--アダルト・チルドレンと 監視社会と", 社会文学, 28, pp.97~111 (2008)
- 岩宮恵子, "思春期体験と現実の多層性--村上春樹『アフターダーク』から(特集 ファンタジーの世界)", 文学, 7(4), pp.115~120 (2006)
- 河合隼雄, "河合隼雄のベストセラー診断 村上春樹『アフターダーク』にみる「コミットメントの条件」", 現代, 39(1), pp.94~101 (2005)
- 清水良典, "終章 鏡よ、鏡よ！『アフターダーク』. 村上春樹はくせになる", pp.207~232 (2006), 朝日新聞社
- 土居豊, "第3章 アフターダークからはじまる新時代の論理─暴力の系譜. いま、村上春樹を読むこと", pp.58~78 (2014), 関西学院大学出版会
- 村上春樹, "目じるしのない悪夢. 村上春樹全作品 1990∼2000 アンダーグラウンド, 6", pp.637~673 (2003), 講談社
- 村上春樹, "『悪』を抱えて生きる. 村上春樹全作品 1990∼2000 約束された場所で、村上春樹、河合隼雄に会いにいく, 7", pp.211~233 (2003), 講談社
- 村上春樹, "解題. 村上春樹全作品 1990∼2000 約束された場所で、村上春樹、河合隼雄に会いにいく, 7", pp.377~395 (2003), 講談社
- 村上春樹, "これだけは、村上さんに言っておこう" (2006), 朝日新聞社
- 吉原千明, "村上春樹論--『アフターダーク』にみる救い", 日本語教育論集, 17, pp.63~70 (2008)