절대평가 도입 전⦁후 수학능력시험 영어 읽기 지문의 어휘 분석 비교
Comparison of Lexical Analysis of English Reading Passages in CSAT before and after Introducing an Absolute Grading System
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of the study was to investigate the differences in lexical analysis between CSAT English passages with an absolute grading system and a relative grading system. The analysis was performed by comparing the number of tokens, the number of types, vocabulary diversity(TTR), high-frequency words distribution, and readability in reading passages. The data were collected from CSAT English reading passages before introducing an absolute grading system in 2015, 2016, 2017, and then presented in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Two programs, AntConc3.5.8 and AntWordProfiler, were used to analyze the data files, and t-tests were used to determine significant differences between the two groups. The results showed that the number of word tokens, word types, and TTR were not significantly different between the two groups, confirming that the lexical composition of CSAT English reading passages remained the same. The high-frequency word distribution analyses showed significant differences between the two groups in a percentage of the 1st 1,000 high-frequency words, the academic words, and out-level words. It meant that the lexical level of reading passages in the absolute grading evaluation was more manageable than before introducing it. The readability score, FGKL, was not different between the two groups, but FRE was more difficult in the tests with an absolute grading system.
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to investigate the differences in lexical analysis between CSAT English passages with an absolute grading system and a relative grading system. The analysis was performed by comparing the number of tokens, the number of types, vocabulary diversity(TTR), high-frequency words distribution, and readability in reading passages. The data were collected from CSAT English reading passages before introducing an absolute grading system in 2015, 2016, 2017, and then presented in 2018, 2019, and 2020. Two programs, AntConc3.5.8 and AntWordProfiler, were used to analyze the data files, and t-tests were used to determine significant differences between the two groups. The results showed that the number of word tokens, word types, and TTR were not significantly different between the two groups, confirming that the lexical composition of CSAT English reading passages remained the same. The high-frequency word distribution analyses showed significant differences between the two groups in a percentage of the 1st 1,000 high-frequency words, the academic words, and out-level words. It meant that the lexical level of reading passages in the absolute grading evaluation was more manageable than before introducing it. The readability score, FGKL, was not different between the two groups, but FRE was more difficult in the tests with an absolute grading system.
참고문헌 (27)
- 고광윤, "한국적 영어학과 영어 코퍼스의 활용", 영어학연구, (19), pp.1~19 (2005), 한국영어학학회
- 고나은, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 수능 영어 읽기 영역 지문 난이도 비교: EBS-수능 연계 정책 전후", 중등영어교육, 10(4), pp.3~24 (2017), 한국중등영어교육학회
- 권서경, "EBS 연계정책에 따른 대학수학능력시험 영어영역 어휘 난이도 변화 분석", 영어교과교육, 13(4), pp.97~121 (2014), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 김낙복, "대학수학능력시험 외국어(영어)영역의 코퍼스 언어학적 어휘 비교 분석", 영어어문교육, 14(4), pp.201~221 (2008), 한국영어어문교육학회
- 김재은, "고등학교 영어 교과서, EBS 수능 연계 교재, 대학수학능력시험의 코퍼스기반 난이도 비교 분석", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 18(1), pp.59~92 (2015), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 김정렬, "수능영어읽기 지문에 대한통시적Coh-Metrix 분석", 초등교과교육연구, 27, pp.63~78 (2017)
- 김제우, "코퍼스기반 고등학교 어휘 사용 연구: 영어 I·II 교과서, 대학수학능력시험, EBS 교재 읽기 지문을 중심으로", 언어과학연구, (80), pp.51~74 (2017), 언어과학회[DOI]
- 김지영, "영어 어휘 제시 유형이 대학생의 영어 어휘 학습에 미치는 효과", 외국학연구, (48), pp.41~58 (2019), 외국학연구소[DOI]
- 박명수, "코퍼스 언어학의 이해와 실제" (2017), 한빛 문화
- 서상규, "국어 정보학 입문" (1999), 태학사
- 이나래, "영어 교과서와 EBS 수능 연계 교재 및 대학수학능력시험 독해지문 소재 분석", 석사, pp.2017
- 이용훈, "를 이용한 텍스트 분석: 코퍼스 분석 도구로서의NLPTools", 담화인지언어 학회학술대회발표논문집, pp.203~213 (2006)
- 장지연, "Coh-Metrix를 통한 2017-2018 수능 영어 독해 지문 비교: 기초 산출치, 이독성, 용이성을 중심으로", Foreign Languages Education, 25(4), pp.81~106 (2018), 한국외국어교육학회[DOI]
- 장지연, "절대평가 도입 전후 수능 영어 독해 지문의 통사적 복잡성 비교", 영어교과교육, 18(2), pp.161~188 (2019), 한국영어교과교육학회[DOI]
- 전문기, "Coh-Metrix를 이용한 중학교 1학년과 2학년 개정 영어교과서 읽기 자료의 코퍼스 언어학적 연계성 분석", 언어과학연구, (56), pp.201~218 (2011), 언어과학회
- 정요한, "절대평가 도입 후 수능 영어 듣기 및 읽기 지문의 난이도 비교: 통사적 복잡성, 소재, 이독성을 중심으로", 멀티미디어 언어교육, 23(3), pp.206~232 (2020), 한국멀티미디어언어교육학회[DOI]
- 최민주, "수능 영어 문항 유형간 응집력과 어휘정보 분석", 한국콘텐츠학회 논문지, 17(12), pp.378~385 (2017), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- Ai, H., "Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data", pp.249~264 (2013), John Benjamins
- Dash, N. S., "History, features, and typology of language corpora" (2018), Springer
- 고광윤, "A Corpus-Based Analysis of College Entrance English Exams in Korea, China, and Japan", 현대문법연구, (62), pp.205~226 (2010), 현대문법학회
- Klare, G. G., "The measurement of readability" (1963), Iowa State University Press
- Lewis, M., "Teaching Collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach" (2000), Language Teaching Publications
- Lu, X., "Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), pp.474~496 (2010)
- Lu, X., "Syntactic complexity in college-level English writing : Differences among writers with diverse L1 backgrounds", Journal of Second Language Writing, 29, pp.16~27 (2015)
- McNamara, D. S., "Automated evaluation of text and discourse with Coh-Metrix" (2014), Cambridge University Press
- Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" (2013), Cambridge University Press
- Sinclair, J. M., "Corpus concordance collocation" (1991), Oxford University Press