일본의 한문직독론에 대한 고찰
A Study of Direct Reading in Chinese in Japan
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
After 1990s, discourse of East Asia prevailed Korean academic world. And the East Asian identity also was a hot issue. So-called “Hanzamunhwagwon(漢字文化圈)” was a theoretical basis of this discourse. Many books and papers written by Japanese scholars were introduced to Korea. Most of them assert that “kunyomi/kundoku(訓讀)” is a common intellectual basis in traditional East Asia. But this is not ture. There is a strong tradition of direct reading of Chinese language in Japan and Korea. The Unique way of reading Chinese in Japan, kunyomi/kundoku is different from Chinese, Korean way of reading. It is a kind of imperfect translation. It is inappopriate to call the Kunyomi/kundoku a common East Asian tradition. This paper explores the tradition of direct reading of Chinese in Japan. From the Edo Period, many Japanse scholars insisted that Japanese also use direct reading of Chinese lika Chinese and Korea. Ogyu Sorai, Dazai Shundai, Amenomori Hoshu, Shigeno Yasutsugu, Aoki Masaru, Kuraishi Takeshiro were reperesentives of that tradtion. Their claims were right. However, there is a political backgraound in kunyomi/kundoku. Mdoern Japan’s nationalism and Emperor system. This paper researches these persons and the political background of Chinese reading in Japan
Abstract
After 1990s, discourse of East Asia prevailed Korean academic world. And the East Asian identity also was a hot issue. So-called “Hanzamunhwagwon(漢字文化圈)” was a theoretical basis of this discourse. Many books and papers written by Japanese scholars were introduced to Korea. Most of them assert that “kunyomi/kundoku(訓讀)” is a common intellectual basis in traditional East Asia. But this is not ture. There is a strong tradition of direct reading of Chinese language in Japan and Korea. The Unique way of reading Chinese in Japan, kunyomi/kundoku is different from Chinese, Korean way of reading. It is a kind of imperfect translation. It is inappopriate to call the Kunyomi/kundoku a common East Asian tradition. This paper explores the tradition of direct reading of Chinese in Japan. From the Edo Period, many Japanse scholars insisted that Japanese also use direct reading of Chinese lika Chinese and Korea. Ogyu Sorai, Dazai Shundai, Amenomori Hoshu, Shigeno Yasutsugu, Aoki Masaru, Kuraishi Takeshiro were reperesentives of that tradtion. Their claims were right. However, there is a political backgraound in kunyomi/kundoku. Mdoern Japan’s nationalism and Emperor system. This paper researches these persons and the political background of Chinese reading in Japan
참고문헌 (24)
- 이기원, "다자이 슌다이(太宰春台)의 훈독을 통해서 본 소라이학파(徂徠學派)의 언어관", 日本學硏究, 28, pp.33~54 (2009), 일본연구소
- 이기원, "오규 소라이(荻生徂徠)의 고문사학(古文辞學)", 日本思想, (16), pp.127~151 (2009), 한국일본사상사학회
- 최정섭, "漢字論을 통한 日本漢學의 中國專有批判", 중국어문학논집, (89), pp.437~457 (2014), 중국어문학연구회
- 히토쓰바시대학 한국학연구센터, "일본 신민족주의전환기에 『국체의 본의』를 읽다" (2017), 어문학사
- 陶德民, "日本における近代中國學の始まり-漢學の革新と同時代文化交涉" (2017), 關西大學出版部
- 荻生祖株の中国語, "武內真弓", 広島大学中国古典文学プロジェクト研究センタ, 29~39, pp.中国古典文学研究(11) (2013)
- 武內真宮, "中国人のように漢文が読めるか―「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」の〈読書〉〈和訓〉〈訳〉―", 中國中世文學硏究, (66), pp.45~61 (2015)
- 武內真弓, "話されない「唐話」ー荻生徂徠の唐話観ー", 中國學研究論集, (33), pp.79~88 (2014)
- 荻生徂徠「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」注釈(1), "武內真弓", 広島大学中国古典文学プロジェクト研究センタ, 31~37, pp.中国古典文学研究(9) (2011)
- 武內真弓, "荻生徂徠「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」譯注(2)", 中国学研究論集, (27), pp.1~8 (2011)
- 武內真弓, "荻生徂徠「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」譯注(3)", 中国学研究論集, (28), pp.62~74 (2012)
- 荻生徂徠「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」譯注(4), "武內真弓", 広島大学中国古典文学プロジェクト研究センタ, 96~112, pp.中国古典文学研究(10) (2012)
- 武內真弓, "荻生徂徠「『訳文筌蹄』題言十則」譯注(5)", 中國學研究論集, (30), pp.87~103 (2013)
- 閻立, "淸末中國の對日政策と日本語認識: 朝貢と條約のはざまで" (2009), 東方書店
- 雨森芳洲, "雨森芳洲全書2: 芳洲文集" (1980), 關西大學出版廣報部
- 重野安繹, "『重野博士史學論文集』下卷" (1939), 雄山閣
- 齋藤希史, "‘支那學’の位置", 日本思想史學, (39), pp.4~ (2007)
- 倉石武四郞, "支那語敎育の理論と實際" (1941), 岩波書店
- 靑木正兒, "本邦における支那學革新の第一步", 支那學, 1(5) (1921)
- 靑木正兒, "『靑木正兒全集』 第2卷" (1970), 春秋社
- 太宰春臺, "倭讀要領(和讀要領)", 嵩山房
- 坂本具償, "校注附例「荻生徂徠『譯文荃蹄』」(一)", 独立行政法人国立高等専門学校機構香川高等専門学校研究紀要, 11, pp.23~85 (2020)
- 坂本具償, "太宰春臺『倭讀要領』譯注（一）", 独立行政法人国立高等専門学校機構香川高等専門学校研究紀要, 11, pp.87~125 (2020)
- 戶川芳郞, "荻生徂徠全集2: 言語篇(譯文筌蹄初編·譯文筌蹄後編·訓譯示蒙" (1994), みすず書房