본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Effect of Online Vacation Service’s Attribute of Consumer Choice: Case Study of People from the Post-80s and 90s Generation in China

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to understand the behaviors of Chinese online vacation consumers and to explore important differences in alignable and non-alignable attributes across consumer segments. Composition/Logic: In this research, we conducted 3 studies. In study 1, verified service types in online vacation services to ensure the strength of the hypothesis. In study 2, derive the attributes and levels by combining a set of products used in the main study. In the study 3, we analyzed online vacation consumers’ preferences for non-alignable attributes and alignable attributes, together with preference differences across consumer segmentation, using the results of choice-based conjoint analysis. Findings: Purchasing experience may differentiate the preferences of consumers, thereby revealing significant differences between inexperienced consumers and experienced consumers in the travel market. In comparison to experienced consumers, inexperienced consumers place a higher value on non-alignable attributes, while experienced consumers place a higher value on alignable attributes. Moreover, the study results suggest that there are significant differences among Chinese consumers of various age groups in the online vacation market. Originality/Value: This research focused on the Chinese Online Vacation Market/service, and concentrated on alignable and non-aliganable attributes, which affect consumer’s choice, Moreover, we also noted the differences between experienced and inexperienced consumers from the post-80s and post-90s generations.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to understand the behaviors of Chinese online vacation consumers and to explore important differences in alignable and non-alignable attributes across consumer segments. Composition/Logic: In this research, we conducted 3 studies. In study 1, verified service types in online vacation services to ensure the strength of the hypothesis. In study 2, derive the attributes and levels by combining a set of products used in the main study. In the study 3, we analyzed online vacation consumers’ preferences for non-alignable attributes and alignable attributes, together with preference differences across consumer segmentation, using the results of choice-based conjoint analysis. Findings: Purchasing experience may differentiate the preferences of consumers, thereby revealing significant differences between inexperienced consumers and experienced consumers in the travel market. In comparison to experienced consumers, inexperienced consumers place a higher value on non-alignable attributes, while experienced consumers place a higher value on alignable attributes. Moreover, the study results suggest that there are significant differences among Chinese consumers of various age groups in the online vacation market. Originality/Value: This research focused on the Chinese Online Vacation Market/service, and concentrated on alignable and non-aliganable attributes, which affect consumer’s choice, Moreover, we also noted the differences between experienced and inexperienced consumers from the post-80s and post-90s generations.

참고문헌 (59)

  1. Alba, J. W., "Dimensions of Consumer Expertise", Journal of Consumer Research, 13(4), pp.411~454 (1987)
  2. Bettiga, D., "Investigating Social Motivations, Opportunity and Ability to Participate in Communities of Virtual co‐Creation", International Journal of Consumer Studies, 42(1), pp.155~163 (2018)
  3. Bhati, A., "Personalised Travel Services : An Exploratory Study in Singapore Context", Journal of Tourism and Hospitality, 02(2), pp.1~6 (2013)
  4. Bowman, Douglas, "Determinants of Competitor Response Time to a New Product Introduction", Journal of Marketing Research, 32(1), pp.42~53 (1995)
  5. Brynjolfsson, E., "Frictionless Commerce? A Comparison of Internet and Conventional Retailer", Management Science, 46(4), pp.563~585 (2000)
  6. Carpenter, G. S., "Competitive Strategies for Late Entry into a Market with a Dominant Brand", Management Science, 36(10), pp.1268~1278 (1990)
  7. Clement, C. A., "Systematicity as a Selection Constraint in Analogical Mapping", Cognitive Science, 15, pp.89~132 (1991)
  8. Dan Xia, "On the Diversification of Consumption Values under Intergenerational Differences", Journal of Commercial Economics, (16), pp.34~36 (2017)
  9. Erickson, Gary M, "Offensive and Defensive Marketing : Closed-loop Duopoly Strategies", Marketing Letters, 4(4), pp.285~295 (1993)
  10. Falkenhainer, B., "The Structure Mapping Engine : Algorithm and Examples", Artificial Intelligence, 41, pp.1~63 (1989)
  11. Gentner, D., "Structure-Mapping : A Theoretical Framework for Analogy", Cognitive Science, 7, pp.155~170 (1983)
  12. Gentner, D., "Structural Alignment in Comparison : No Difference without Similarity", Psychological Science, 5, pp.152~158 (1994)
  13. Gentner, D., "Structure Mapping in Analogy and Similarity", American Psychologist, 52, pp.45~56 (1997)
  14. Gentner, D., "Perspective on Thought and Language:Interrelations in Development" (1991), Cambridge University Press
  15. Goldstone, R. L., "Relational Similarity and the Non Independence of Features in Similarity Judgments", Cognitive Psychology, 23, pp.222~262 (1991)
  16. Grant, S. J., "The Effect of Temporal Frame on Information Considered in New Product Evaluation : The Role of Uncertainty", Journal of Consumer Research, 34(6), pp.897~913 (2008)
  17. Green, PE, "On The Design of Choice Experiments Involving Multifactor Alternatives", Journal of Consumer Research, (1), pp.61~68 (1974)
  18. Green PE, "Conjoint Analysis in Marketing Research: New Developments and Directions", Journal of Marketing, (54), pp.3~19 (1990)
  19. Gruca, T. S., "An Equilibrium Analysis of Defensive Response to Entry Using a Coupled Response Function Model", Marketing Science, 11(4), pp.348~358 (1992)
  20. Hauser, J. R., "Defensive Marketing Strategies", Marketing Science, 2(4), pp.319~360 (1983)
  21. Hauser, J., "Self-Reflection and Articulated Consumer Preferences", Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(1), pp.17~32 (2014)
  22. Hauser, "Application of the Defender Consumer Model", Marketing Science, 3(4), pp.327~351 (1984)
  23. Hsee, C. K., "The Evaluability Hypothesis : An Explanation for Preference Reversals Between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67, pp.247~257 (1996)
  24. Jia, Y., "An Empirical Study of Generational Differences in Work Values for Chinese New Generation", Soft Science (2013)
  25. Jin Sun, "The Effect of Attribute Alignability on Service Evaluation : The Moderating Role of Uncertainty", Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), pp.831~847 (2012)
  26. Kalra, Ajay, "Response to Competitive Entry : A Rationale for Delayed Defensive Reaction", Marketing Science, 17(4), pp.380~405 (1998)
  27. 김용준, "Hybrid DEFENDER 모델:소비자의 이질성과 동태적 선호분포", 마케팅연구, 17(1), pp.39~71 (2002), 한국마케팅학회
  28. Kivetz, R., "The Effects of Incomplete Information on Consumer Choice", Journal of Marketing Research, 37, pp.427~448 (2000)
  29. Kubovy, M., "The Whole is Equal to The Sum of Its Parts : A Probabilistic Model of Grouping By Proximity and Similarity in Regular Patterns", Psychological Review, 115(1), pp.131~154 (2008)
  30. Kumar, K. Ravi, "Defensive Marketing Strategies : An Equilibrium Analysis Based on Decoupled Response Function Models", Management Science, 34(7), pp.805~815 (1988)
  31. Maclnnis, D. J., "Enhancing and Measuring Consumers' Motivation, Opportunity, and Ability to Process Brand Information from Ads", Journal of Marketing, 55(4), pp.32~53 (1991)
  32. Markman, B. Arthur, "Similarity and Alignment in Choice", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63(2), pp.117~130 (1995)
  33. Markman, B. Arthur, "Structural Alignment During Similarity Comparisons", Cognitive Psychology, 25, pp.431~467 (1993)
  34. Markman, B. Arthur, "Commonalities and Differences in Similarity Comparisons", Memory and Cognition, 24, pp.235~249 (1996)
  35. Markman, B. Arthur, "The Effects of Alignability on Memory storage", Psychological Science, 8, pp.363~367 (1997)
  36. Mary Frances Luce, "Constructive Consumer Choice Processes", Journal of Consumer Research, 25, pp.187~217 (1998)
  37. Medin, D. L., "Similarity Involving Attributes and Relations : Judgments of Similarity and Differences are Not Inverses", Psychological Science, 1, pp.64~69 (1990)
  38. Nowlis S, "Attribute-Task Compatibility as a Determinant of Consumer Preference Reversals", J. Mark. Res, 34, pp.205~218 (1997)
  39. Lee, Min-Hwan, "Competitive Marketing Strategy for O2O Platform Business:New Entrance Strategy", doctoral, Business Administration, pp.2016
  40. Ostrom A., "Consumer Trade Offs and The Evaluation of Services", Journal of Marketing, 59(1), pp.17~28 (1995)
  41. Parasuraman, A., "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research", Journal of Marketing, 49(Fall), pp.41~50 (1985)
  42. Putrevu, S., "Exploring the Origins and Information Processing Differences Between Men and Women: Implications for Advertisers", Academy of Marketing Science Review, 10, pp.1~14 (2001)
  43. Putrevu, S., "A Model of Search Behavior with an Application to Grocery Shopping", Journal of Retailing, 73, pp.463~486 (1997)
  44. Roberts, John H., "A Prelaunch Diffusion Model for Evaluating Market Defense Strategies", Marketing Science, 24(1), pp.150~164 (2005)
  45. Robinson, T. William, "Marketing Mix Reactions to Entry", Marketing Science, 7(4), pp.368~385 (1988)
  46. Seo, Hyeon-Yeong, "Competitive Marketing Strategy of O2O Platform Business:Defender Strategy of Korean Delivery Application Market", doctoral, Business Administration, pp.2015
  47. Shugan, Steven M., "Estimating Brand Positioning Maps Using Supermarket Scanning Data", Journal of Marketing Research, 24, pp.1~18 (1987)
  48. Simonson, I., "Determinants of Customers' Responses to Customized Offers : Conceptual Framework and Research Propositions", Journal of Marketing, 69(1), pp.32~45 (2005)
  49. Simonson, Itamar, "Get Closer to Your Customers by Understanding How They Make Choices", California Management Review, 35(4), pp.68~84 (1993)
  50. Smith, M. D., "Understanding Digital Markets:Review and Assessment", Ssrn Electronic Journal (2001)
  51. Sun, J., "Value Differences Between Generations in China : A Study in Shanghai", Journal of Youth Studies, 13(1), pp.65~81 (2010)
  52. Tiedens, L. Z., "Judgment Under Emotional Certainty and Uncertainty : The Effects of Specific Emotions on Information Processing", Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, pp.973~988 (2001)
  53. Tulgan, B., "Not Everyone Gets a Trophy: How to Manage Generation Y" (2009), Jossey-Bass
  54. Kim, Yong-June, "A Literature Review on the Value and the Lifestyle of Contemporary Chinese Consumers", International Business Journal, 11(1), pp.1~30 (2002)
  55. You, J., "An Empirical Study of Generational Differences in Work Values for Chinese New Generation", Soft Science (2013)
  56. Zeithaml, Valarie A., "Marketing of Services" (1981), American Marketing Association
  57. Zhang, Shi, "Overcoming the Early Entrant Advantage : The Role of Alignable and Non-alignable Differences", Journal of Marketing Research, 35(4), pp.413~426 (1998)
  58. 2018年中国在线旅游行业研究报告, "艾瑞", ~ (2018)
  59. 中国在线度假旅游市场季度监测分析, "易观", ~ (2018)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)