从“孔子之祀”到“圣孔释奠礼”
The From “the Memorial Service for Confucius” to “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius”
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
在本论文中,笔者把在阙里孔氏家庙举行的孔子之祀,作为“圣孔释奠礼”的直接来源,讨论了孔子之祀释奠化成为“圣孔释奠礼”的全过程及其动因。其主要内容包括以下三点。一、“圣孔释奠礼”的形成肇始于孔子之祀的国家祀典化。两汉之际,儒家思想在政治上受到很大重视,不仅如此,因谶纬的推广,孔子的存在被认为与汉朝的正统性直接相关,他的地位亦不断被提高,并由此逐渐被神圣化了。在这种环境下,国家开始控制孔子之祀。朝廷封赐孔子后裔爵位,使他们奉孔子之祀,这种措施不仅使孔子后裔开始具有官方的身份,而且突出了国家在孔子之祀中的地位。东汉初期,朝廷已经使地方长官或教学官在郡、县、道的学校举行孔子之祀,这标志着,在阙里家庙以外的地方所举行的孔子之祀确是国家祀典体系的一部分。到了东汉末年,朝廷进一步在阙里孔庙设置专职官员,负责孔子之祀,并且其相关费用亦由政府承担,由此,在阙里孔氏家庙所举行的孔子之祀与在其他地方所举行的孔子之祀,都完全被纳入了国家祭祀的范围之中。二、国家祀典化了的孔子之祀走出阙里家庙,走进太学,以“释奠”之名重生,进一步接近“圣孔释奠礼”的完成。曹魏之际,孔子之祀作为帝王教育的一部分进入太学,成为释奠礼。到东晋以后,释奠礼结合了讲儒经的活动,共同构成皇位继承的通过仪式,象征了皇位继承者之资格的获得和完成。释奠礼关系到皇位继承,起着象征皇权正统性的作用。因此,皇太子与少年天子举行的释奠礼不再是简单的学礼,而是隆重的国家大典。这样,当时就有必要创建合适的礼仪场所,所以东晋孝武帝以后开始仿借阙里孔氏家庙,在太学创建了释奠礼的专用场所——孔子庙。三、唐朝完成统一之后,在六朝时期国家正统观念——儒教的影响下,关系到皇位继承的释奠礼,逐渐得到与新王朝统治原则相适应的整备,并最终定型,成为“圣孔释奠礼”。在这一进程中,玄宗出于以孝道为代表的自己政权权威的考虑,树立了“以孝治天下”的统治原则,并为此积极推行孝道思想,树立孔子与儒学的权威地位。在这种环境下,周公退出官学圣贤之祀,释奠礼主享孔子最终定型。皇太子释奠礼亦成为奉皇帝之命举行的释奠礼的最高层次。总之,纵观“孔子之祀”成为“圣孔释奠礼”的全过程,可以看出,其变化的动因在于儒教的时代地位和执政者的统治原则。在历史上,对孔子的祭祀仪式,扮演了执政者将自己的统治原则明示于天下的主要象征性工具的角色。汉唐释奠礼的形成过程就显著地表明了这一点。汉唐释奠礼承担的时代功能及由此衍生的形式上的定型,成为后代释奠礼的蓝本。
Abstract
In this paper, I regard “the memorial service for Confucius(孔子之祀)” held in the family shrine of Que-Li(阙里) as immediate source of “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius(圣孔释奠礼)”, and is dealing with the whole process and motives of “the memorial service for Confucius” shaping into “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius”. The main arguments of this paper are as below. First, the beginning of “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius” started from the Imperial House holding Ritual Practices of “the memorial service for Confucius”. In Han Dynasty reign period, Confucianism has a very important rule in dominant groups, and especially “Prognostication and apocryphal texts (谶纬)” which had been widely spread throughout society in that time provided a occasion for justifying of Han Dynasty’ rules. Through a series of this process, Confucius has gradually been sacralized and at the same time the status of him and his family was ascended. For instance, The Imperial Government conferred the title of nobility on descendants of Confucius, made them hold “the memorial service for Confucius”. This measure means that descendants of Confucius are in the Imperial Government service through directly performing sacrificial rites for Confucius. Furthermore, in the early years of the Eastern Han Dynasty, government newly started to appoint local officials engaging in “the memorial service for Confucius” in the schools of every region. In the late of the Eastern Han Dynasty, government after all set up official position in government center in mainly performing “the memorial service for Confucius” in the family shrine of Que-Li(阙里), and stood all the expenses for it. Through this process, “the memorial service for Confucius” that is initially held in the family shrine and in the schools of the regions, finally was enrolled into official institutions and system of the State cult practices. Second, “the memorial service for Confucius” as a royal ritual practices in the beginning takes the family shrine of Que-Li(阙里)’s form, but after go through a series of measures taken by a few of top rulers it eventually was reborn in form named “the Rituals of Shi Dian(释奠礼)” at the Imperial Academy(太学), That is nearly similar to “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius(圣孔释奠礼)” in form and procedure. In the CaoWei Dynasty(曹魏)’periods, “the memorial service for Confucius” served to one of the main parts of education for emperors got in the Imperial Academy, at that time, it was ascended official performance called “the Ritual of Shi Dian”. Since the Eastern Jin Dynasty(东晋), “the Ritual of Shi Dian” had started to get out of simple performance form and pattern and gradually had have a various and complex functions. For example, that is combined with lectures on Confucian Scriptures in the Imperial Academy, the symbolization of the rites of passage for succession to the Imperial Throne, confirmation and completion of qualification for succession to the Imperial Throne, and so on. Since this time “the Ritual of Shi Dian” centered in the Crown Prince and the Juvenile Emperor was not simply a sort of one-dimensioned simple ritual, but rather at least had embodied in royal family’s dignity and its supreme authority. For doing this ends appropriately and well, most of all the most important thing was to construct place for “the Ritual of Shi Dian”. And so, since XiaoWu Emperor(孝武帝) of the Eastern Jin Dynasty, the ruler group founded a sort of sacred place-the Kong temple(孔子庙) on the basis of the Confucius shrine of Que-Li(阙里), in the Imperial Academy. Third, after Tang Dynasty unifying a whole nation, the development of “the Ritual of Shi Dian” gradually has been in lined with the rule principle of New Kingdom, finally became “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius”. In this process, XuanZong(玄宗) made big contributions in this trends, he putted emphasis on dominance by Confucian virtues, especially by “Filial piety”. Due to his vigorous effort, during his reign, along with the thought of loyalty and filial rapidly spread on the whole nation, the status and authority of Confucius and Confucianism also naturally been established. From this time, ZhouGong(周公) naturally was thrown out in the memorial ceremony for the Sages performed by government school, only Confucius put down roots in performance of “the Ritual of Shi Dian”. Since this time, “The Shi Dian Ritual of the Crown Prince” has become the grandest ritual for Confucius that was held by Emperor’s commands himself. In conclusion, the whole process and development of “the memorial service for Confucius” becoming “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Sage Confucius” shows the fact that the result of Emperor’s political belief and practice being mainly based on Confucianism’s values and continually effort to spread them into whole nation by intension. So “the Ritual of Shi Dian for Confucius” institution and its functions eventually symbolize the groundings of each ruler’s legitimate reign and authority, which is mainly due to the political ideals of Confucianism, namely the dominance on virtues.
참고문헌 (33)
- 郑玄注, "十三经注疏" (1999), 北京大学出版社
- 郑玄注, "十三经注疏" (1999), 北京大学出版社
- 司马迁撰, "史记" (2000), 中华书局
- 班固撰, "颜师古注:《汉书》" (2000), 中华书局
- 陆贾撰, "新语校注" (1986), 中华书局
- 陈寿撰, "三国志" (2000), 中华书局
- 范晔撰, "后汉书" (2000), 中华书局
- 沈约撰, "宋书" (2000), 中华书局
- 萧子显撰, "南齐书" (2000), 中华书局
- 欧阳询撰, "艺文类聚", 影印文渊阁
- 房玄龄等撰, "晋书" (2000), 中华书局
- 姚思廉撰, "陈书" (2000), 中华书局
- 魏徵等撰, "隋书" (2000), 中华书局
- 杜佑撰, "Tongdian" (1988), 中华书局
- 中敕撰, "大唐开元礼" (2000), 民族出版社
- 刘昫等撰, "旧唐书" (2000), 中华书局
- 李昉等撰, "太平御览", 影印文渊阁
- 王应麟撰, "玉海", 影印文渊阁
- 欧阳修, "新唐书" (2000), 中华书局
- 王溥撰, "唐会要" (1935), 商务印书馆
- 孔传, "孔子文化大全" (1990), 山东友谊书社
- 孙瑴撰, "古微书", 影印文渊阁
- 陈镐纂修, "孔子文化大全" (1989), 山东友谊书社
- 孙希旦撰, "礼记集解 ,十三经清人注疏" (2007), 中华书局
- 高明士, "中国教育史" (2004), 台大出版中心
- 高 文, "汉碑集释" (1997), 河南大学出版社
- 李 申, "中国儒教史" (2000), 上海人民出版社
- 廖平, "古学考" (1935), 景山书社
- 松浦千春, "魏晋南朝の帝位継承と釈奠儀礼", 东洋史论集, (9) (2003)
- 汤志钧等, "西汉经学与政治" (1994), 上海古籍出版社
- 汪受宽译注, "孝经" (2004), 上海古籍出版社
- 杨志刚, "中国礼仪制度研究" (2000), 华东师范大学出版社
- 周予同, "周予同经学史论著选集" (1983), 上海人民出版社
