본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

王夫之對《大學》的理解 ――以與朱熹比較為中心

Wang Fuzi’s Understanding of the Great Learning: In Comparison to Zhu Xi’s Understanding

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

筆者在本論文中,作為理解王夫之經學的第一步,以《讀四書大全說》為中心考察了王夫之對《大學》的理解。對於《大學》八條目的關係,王夫之說《大學》只說“先後”而沒說“前後”,認為在追求這八個條目的同時,只要區分緩急即可。因此把八條目的相互關係概括為“理一分殊”。《大學》從“大學之道,在明明德。”這句話開始。王夫之認為所謂“明德”,是指通過功夫來彰明的最高境界“心”,而不是指“性”。因為性是不可加以明之的功夫。王夫之把“知”分為兩種:一種是知道物件,另一種是知道善惡。他強調朱熹所說的“知”應該解釋為徹底地知道善惡的“知”。因此,王夫之也理所當然地把“知”理解為知道善惡。對於知與行的關係,朱熹主張“知先行重”,王夫之則主張“知行並進”。他強烈主張不能從根本上把知與行分離開,不但知需要行,而且行也需要知。對於王夫之來說,“誠意”不是在否定意義上約束或壓制什麼,而相反是在肯定意義上使其充溢。讓“所知之理”充滿心中,徹底貫穿物件,讓“意”從那裡出來。它既不是生來就能做到的,也不是可以強求的,而是通過功夫達到一定境界時能自然而然做到的。而且,王夫之認為自謙、好好色、惡惡臭並不像朱熹所說的那樣是對意的說明,而是對心的說明。同時對於意和心的關係提出獨特的主張,即意和心互為體用、互為內外,所謂“正心”的心就是“志”。他批判朱熹沒有正確地理解“心”。在東方的傳統社會中,很多時候把君主比喻為父親,把大臣和百姓比喻為子女,對家庭和國家給予同等的地位。所以認為,就像父親在家庭裡慈愛地對待子女一樣,君主要在國家裡慈愛地對待大臣和百姓。王夫之卻主張不能那麼做。如果把他們聯繫在一起,國家和家庭就沒有分別了。兩者之間雖然具有相通的道理,但是分明家庭用的是“齊”,國家用的是“治”,它們是有區別的。因此王夫之對“推”解釋說,不是把家庭的慈愛推衍到國家的慈愛,而是把家庭中的教育內容推廣到國家教育之上。可以看出,他把《大學》看作是一本徹底為教育而寫的書。

Abstract

This paper examines Wang Fuzi’s 王夫之 understanding of the Daxue 大學 (Great Learning). Wang interpreted the concept ba tiaomu 八條目 (eight steps of moral cultivation) in the Daxue as liyi fenshu 理一分殊 (one Principle and its multiple manifestations). The Daxue begins with the phrase: “The way of the Daxue is to brighten the luminous virtue.” Wang Fuzi held that the luminous virtue belongs to xin 心 (mind), not xing 性 (human nature), because xing has no ability to brighten something. Wang Fuzi argued that there are two sorts of knowledge: knowledge of objects and knowledge of good and evil. Wang held that Zhu Xi’s 朱熹 teachings about knowledge are the latter, and further argued that knowledge and conduct are inseparable since knowledge requires conduct and conduct requires knowledge. Wang maintained that when xin is filled with li 理, yi 意 comes from it. This can be achieved through inner self-cultivation. Based on his understanding of xin and xing, Wang attempted to argue the following: In some cases yi is ti 體 and xin is yong 用. In some cases yi is yong and xin is ti. Sometimes yi is internal and xin is external. Sometimes yi is external and xin is internal. Wang Fuzi also criticised Zhu Xi for misunderstanding xin and insisted that xin in the phrase zhengxin 正心 refers to zhi 志. In East Asian traditions, the state was often compared to the family. The emperor of the state was also compared to the father in the family. Wang Fuzi held they were different, but the principle of regulating them is the same. Therefore, the contents of education should be the same both in the state and in the family. To that end, Wang argued that the Daxue was a book on education, not on politics. In short, this paper argues that Wang Fuzi's understanding of the Daxue was based primarily on the principle liyi fenshu 理一分殊.

참고문헌 (4)

  1. 胡廣, "四書大全" (1992), 友誼書社出版
  2. 黎靖德, "朱子語類" (1992), 友誼書社出版
  3. 林玉均, "戴震" (2000), 成均館大學出版部
  4. 王夫之, "讀四書大全說" (1974), 河洛圖書出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)