본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

How to Interpret Mencius’ Concept of “Xing” 性?: The Debate in Western Sinology and Its Current Significance

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류유교학

초록

Two ardent debates over the Mencian theory of human nature were launched by sinologists in the late nineteenth century, a period of missionary sinology, and in the late twentieth century, a period of professional sinology. In the first debate, James Legge articulates the value of the Mencian theory of human nature from Bishop Butler’s view of conscience. He interprets Mencius’ “goodness of human nature” as “human nature towards good.” However, Davelle Sheffield criticizes that Mencius and Legge both deny the grace of God. The second debate focuses on the divergence between Roger T. Ames’ culturalism and Irene Bloom’s theory of common human nature. Such divergence is deeply rooted in both sides’ differing attitudes towards democracy and human rights. Despite different strategies and tactics, the two debates are closely related to each other in terms of their core concepts, which can be traced back to the Catholic churches’ different understandings of Mencius’ conception of human nature over 400 years ago.

Abstract

Two ardent debates over the Mencian theory of human nature were launched by sinologists in the late nineteenth century, a period of missionary sinology, and in the late twentieth century, a period of professional sinology. In the first debate, James Legge articulates the value of the Mencian theory of human nature from Bishop Butler’s view of conscience. He interprets Mencius’ “goodness of human nature” as “human nature towards good.” However, Davelle Sheffield criticizes that Mencius and Legge both deny the grace of God. The second debate focuses on the divergence between Roger T. Ames’ culturalism and Irene Bloom’s theory of common human nature. Such divergence is deeply rooted in both sides’ differing attitudes towards democracy and human rights. Despite different strategies and tactics, the two debates are closely related to each other in terms of their core concepts, which can be traced back to the Catholic churches’ different understandings of Mencius’ conception of human nature over 400 years ago.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. Ames, Roger, "Chinese Texts and Philosophical Contexts: Essays Dedicated to Angus C. Graham", pp.143~175 (1991), Open Court
  2. Ames, Roger, "Mengzi xinxing zhi xue 孟子心性之學 (Mencius’ Learning of Mental-Nature)", pp.305~331 (2005), Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe
  3. Behuniak, James, "Mencius on Becoming Human" (2004), State University of New York Press
  4. Bloom, Irene, "Mencian Arguments on Human Nature (jen-hsing)", Philosophy East and West, 44(1), pp.19~53 (1994)
  5. Bloom, Irene, "Human Nature and Biological Nature in Mencius", Philosophy East and West, 47(1), pp.21~32 (1997)
  6. Bloom, Irene, "Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations", pp.91~102 (2002), University of Hawai’i Press
  7. Bloom, Irene, "Mengzi xinxing zhi xue 孟子心性之學 (Mencius’ Learning of Mental-Nature)", pp.225~242 (2005), Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe
  8. Butler, Joseph, "Fifteen Sermons Preached at the Rolls Chapel" (1827), Hilliard and Brown
  9. Chan, Alan K. L., "Mencius: Contexts and Interpretations" (2002), University of Hawai’i Press
  10. Graham, Angus, "The Background of the Mencian Theory of Human Nature", Tsing Hua Journal of Chinese Studies, 6, pp.215~274 (1967)
  11. Kern, Iso, "“Ouzhou zhexue zhong de liangxin guannian” 歐洲哲學中的良心觀念 (The Concept of Conscience in European Philosophy)", Zhejiang daxue xuebao, 4, pp.23~29 (1997)
  12. Lau, D. C., "Mencius" (1970), Penguin Books
  13. Legge, James, "The Life and Works of Mencius" (1875), Lippincott
  14. Legge, James, "Confucianism in Relation to Christianity: A Paper Read before the Missionary Conference in Shanghai" (1877), Kelly & Walsh; Trübner
  15. Legge, James, "The Religions of China: Confucianism and Taoism Described and Compared with Christianity" (1880), Hodder and Stoughton
  16. Munro, Donald J., "A Chinese Ethics for the New Century" (2005), Chinese University Press
  17. Ni, Liangkang, "“Jiaohu wenhua lijie zhong de ‘geyi’ xianxiang: yige jiaohu wenhuashi de he xianxiangxue de fenxi” 交互文化理解中的“格義”現象: 一個交互文化史的和現象學的分析 (“Geyi” in Understanding Interactive Culture: An Analysis on the History of Interactive Culture and Phenomenology)", Zhejiang Academic Journal, 2, pp.22~28 (1998)
  18. Pannenberg, Wolfhart, "Jindai deguo xinjiao shenxue wentishi: cong shilaiermahe dao bate he dilixi 近代德國新教神學問題史:從施賴爾馬赫到巴特和蒂利希 (Problemgeschichte der neueren evangelischen Theologie in Deutschland: von Schleiermacher bis zu Barth und Tillich)" (2010), Daofeng shushe
  19. Sheffield, D. Z., "A Discussion of the Confucian Doctrine Concerning Man’s Nature at Birth", The Chinese Recorder and Missionary Journal, 9, pp.11~23 (1878)
  20. Tang, Yongtong, "Lixue, foxue, xuanxue 理學, 佛學, 玄學 (Neo-Confucianism, Buddhism, and Wei-Jin Neo-Daoism)" (1991), Beijing daxue chubanshe
  21. Wilson, Edward O., "Sociobiology: The New Synthesis" (1975), Harvard University Press
  22. Yang, Zebo, "“‘Xing’ de kunhuo: yi xifang zhexue yanjiu ruxue suo yu kunnan de yige lizheng” “性”的困惑: 以西方哲學研究儒學所遇困難的一個例證 (The Confusion of Nature: An Example of the Difficulties Faced by Western Sinologists When Studying Confucianism)", China Scholarship, 24, pp.248~269 (2007)
  23. Zhang, Qingxiong, "“Jidujiao he rujia sixiang chuantong zhong de renxing wenti zaisi” 基督教和儒家思想傳統中的人性問題再思 (Rethinking on Human Nature in Christianity and Confucianism)", Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, Academia Sinica, ~
  24. Zhu, Weizheng, "Limadou zhongwen zhuyiji 利瑪竇中文著譯集 (Collections of Matteo Ricci’s Chinese Works)" (2001), Fudan daxue chubanshe

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)