중세국어의 사이시옷과 합성명사
Sai-siot and Compound Nouns in Middle Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to examine the characteristics of the Korean morpheme ‘ㅅ’ (Sai-siot) that was used to make a compound noun bridging two separate nouns in Middle Korean. Sai-siot was largely divided into two kinds in usage in Middle Korean: one is the genitive case with grammatical function, ‘-ㅅ’, and the other is Sait-sori ‘ㅅ’ that was produced in the combination of two linguistic forms. These two kinds of ‘-ㅅ’ had clearly different origins, but such a classification is considered to have dissipated in the specific environment of making a compound noun during the Middle Korean stage. In the end, there are cases where the constitution of noun phrases that used ‘-ㅅ’ as genitive case became independent words, and there are cases where Sait-sori ‘ㅅ’ was produced in connection with ‘noun+noun’. The ‘ㅅ’ that is shown in compound nouns in Modern Korean should not confine its origin only to the genitive case of ‘-ㅅ’ in Middle Korean; the ‘ㅅ’ that is used in compound nouns in Modern Korean remains as a mixed use of both genitive case and Sait-sori in the structure of compound nouns rather than a complete succession of the genitive case of ‘-ㅅ’ in Middle Korean.
Abstract
This study aims to examine the characteristics of the Korean morpheme ‘ㅅ’ (Sai-siot) that was used to make a compound noun bridging two separate nouns in Middle Korean. Sai-siot was largely divided into two kinds in usage in Middle Korean: one is the genitive case with grammatical function, ‘-ㅅ’, and the other is Sait-sori ‘ㅅ’ that was produced in the combination of two linguistic forms. These two kinds of ‘-ㅅ’ had clearly different origins, but such a classification is considered to have dissipated in the specific environment of making a compound noun during the Middle Korean stage. In the end, there are cases where the constitution of noun phrases that used ‘-ㅅ’ as genitive case became independent words, and there are cases where Sait-sori ‘ㅅ’ was produced in connection with ‘noun+noun’. The ‘ㅅ’ that is shown in compound nouns in Modern Korean should not confine its origin only to the genitive case of ‘-ㅅ’ in Middle Korean; the ‘ㅅ’ that is used in compound nouns in Modern Korean remains as a mixed use of both genitive case and Sait-sori in the structure of compound nouns rather than a complete succession of the genitive case of ‘-ㅅ’ in Middle Korean.
참고문헌 (31)
- 姜成一, "中世國語 造語論 연구", 박사, pp.1972
- 고창수, "중기국어 사잇소리의 위상론", 한국어학, 1, pp.135~148 (1994)
- 권용경, "국어 사이시옷에 대한 통시적 연구", 박사, pp.2001
- 김광해, "복합명사의 신생과 어휘화 과정에 대하여", 국어국문학, 88, pp.5~29 (1982)
- 김인균, "합성명사의 의미 관계와 사이시옷에 대하여", 한국어 의미학, 11, pp.119~138 (2002), 한국어의미학회
- 김종택, "사잇소리 ‘ㅅ’과 형태소 ‘ㅅ’에 대하여", 국어교육연구, 12, pp.1~12 (1980)
- 박종희, "중세 국어 사잇소리의 표기와 기능", 국어문학, 48(48), pp.41~62 (2010), 국어문학회
- 박창원, "사잇소리와 사이시옷(Ⅰ)", 이화어문논집, 15, pp.461~482 (1997)
- 안배근, "중세국어에 나타난 ‘사이시옷’의 기능", 전주대 논총, 8, pp.147~170 (1997)
- 안병희, "중세국어의 속격어미 ‘-ㅅ’에 대하여, In 이숭녕박사 송수기념논총" (1968), 을유문화사
- 안병희, "국어사연구" (1993), 문학과지성사
- 엄태수, "현대국어 사이시옷 현상의 검토", 국제어문, 38(38), pp.165~200 (2006), 국제어문학회
- 우민섭, "사이 ㅅ 연구", 새국어연구, 37, pp.333~354 (1983)
- 이기문, "국어 음운사 연구" (1972), 탑출판사
- 이기문, "(신정판)국어사개설" (1998), 태학사
- 李德興, "國語 사이시옷의 文獻的 연구", 박사, pp.1991
- 이병근, "유음 탈락의 음운론과 형태론", 한글, 173, pp.223~246 (1981)
- 이숭녕, "중세국어문법" (1961), 을유문화사
- 이재인, "국어 복합명사 구성의 이해, In 국어학의 새로운 인식과 전개(김완진선생 회갑기념논총)" (1991), 민음사
- 이주행, "국어의 복합어에 대한 고찰", 국어국문학, 86, pp.53~87 (1981)
- 이현희, "중세국어의 합성어와 음운론적인 정보, In 이승욱선생 회갑기념논총", pp.315~333 (1991)
- 이희승, "국어학개설" (1955), 민중서관
- 임홍빈, "사이시옷 문제의 해결을 위하여", 국어학, 10, pp.1~35 (1981)
- 전철웅, ""사이시옷,” 국어 연구 어디까지 왔나" (1990), 동아출판사
- 정연찬, "개정 한국어 음운론" (1997), 한국문화사
- 정인승, "고대 사이된소리 표기법의 새 고찰, In 최현배선생 환갑기념논문집" (1954), 사상계사
- 최현배, "고친 한글갈" (1961), 정음문화사
- 최형용, "사잇소리 현상과 표기", 한중인문학연구, 23(23), pp.151~176 (2008), 한중인문학회
- 최형용, "현대 국어의 사이시옷은 과연 형태소인가", 형태론, 11(1), pp.61~78 (2009)
- 허웅, "국어음운학" (1965), 정음사
- 허웅, "우리옛말본" (1975), 샘문화사